Literature DB >> 18751814

What is the role of magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of total hip arthroplasty?

Hollis G Potter1, Li F Foo, Bryan J Nestor.   

Abstract

MRI has been shown to be an extremely effective instrument in the management of painful hip arthroplasty. Its superior soft tissue contrast and direct multiplanar acquisition compared to computerized tomography (CT) and radiographs allows for reproducible visualization of periacetabular osteolysis, demonstrating compression of neurovascular bundles by extracapsular synovial deposits. In addition, MRI can often elucidate etiology of neuropathy in the perioperative period and is further helpful in evaluating the soft tissue envelope, including the attachment of the hip abductors, short external rotators and iliopsoas tendon. A further advantage of MRI over CT is its lack of ionizing radiation. Most importantly, MRI can disclose intracapsular synovial deposits that precede osteoclastic resorption of bone.

Entities:  

Year:  2005        PMID: 18751814      PMCID: PMC2504127          DOI: 10.1007/s11420-005-0112-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  HSS J        ISSN: 1556-3316


  24 in total

1.  Complications of total hip arthroplasty: MR imaging-initial experience.

Authors:  L M White; J K Kim; M Mehta; N Merchant; M E Schweitzer; W B Morrison; C R Hutchison; A E Gross
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Magnetic resonance imaging of painful shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  John W Sperling; Hollis G Potter; Edward V Craig; Evan Flatow; Russell F Warren
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2002 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.019

3.  Use of magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of an occult fracture of the femoral component after total hip arthroplasty. A case report.

Authors:  Scott M Cook; Paul M Pellicci; Hollis G Potter
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  The correlation between the roentgenographic appearance and operative findings at the bone-cement junction of the socket in Charnley low friction arthroplasties.

Authors:  J P Hodgkinson; P Shelley; B M Wroblewski
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  MR imaging of 22 Charnley-Müller total hip prostheses.

Authors:  J A Lemmens; J R van Horn; J den Boer; W van der Riet; J H Ruijs
Journal:  Rofo       Date:  1986-09

6.  Arthrographic study of painful total hip arthroplasty: refined criteria.

Authors:  T P Maus; T H Berquist; C E Bender; J A Rand
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1987-03       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Comparison of CT, MRI, and radiographs in assessing pelvic osteolysis: a cadaveric study.

Authors:  Tim A Walde; Daniel E Weiland; Serena B Leung; Nobuto Kitamura; Christi J Sychterz; C Anderson Engh; Alexandra M Claus; Hollis G Potter; Charles A Engh
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Use of helical computed tomography for the assessment of acetabular osteolysis after total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Lalit Puri; Richard L Wixson; Steven H Stern; Joe Kohli; Ronald W Hendrix; S David Stulberg
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  Radiographic versus clinical loosening of the acetabular component in noninfected total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  A S Carlsson; C F Gentz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1984-05       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Magnetic resonance imaging after total hip arthroplasty: evaluation of periprosthetic soft tissue.

Authors:  Hollis G Potter; Bryan J Nestor; Carolyn M Sofka; Stephanie T Ho; Lance E Peters; Eduardo A Salvati
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 5.284

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Surgical approach in primary total hip arthroplasty: anatomy, technique and clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Stephen Petis; James L Howard; Brent L Lanting; Edward M Vasarhelyi
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 2.089

2.  Relationship between cup position and obturator externus muscle in total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Michael Müller; Marc Dewey; Ivonne Springer; Carsten Perka; Stephan Tohtz
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2010-07-21       Impact factor: 2.359

3.  MR thermometry near metallic devices using multispectral imaging.

Authors:  Hans Weber; Valentina Taviani; Daehyun Yoon; Pejman Ghanouni; Kim Butts Pauly; Brian A Hargreaves
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2016-03-16       Impact factor: 4.668

4.  [CT and MRI of hip arthroplasty].

Authors:  C A Agten; R Sutter; C W A Pfirrmann
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 0.635

5.  Importance of preoperative imaging in acetabular revision surgery - a case report.

Authors:  Hc Schmitz; Cc Egidy; H Al-Khateeb; G Cárdenas; T Gehrke; D Kendoff
Journal:  Open Orthop J       Date:  2012-05-30

6.  An ideal dielectric coat to avoid prosthesis RF-artefacts in Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Authors:  U Zanovello; L Matekovits; L Zilberti
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-03-23       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Comparisons of slice-encoding metal artifact correction and view-angle tilting magnetic resonance imaging and traditional digital radiography in evaluating chronic hip pain after total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Yimin Ma; Panli Zuo; Mathias Nittka; Xiaoguang Cheng; Hongyi Shao; Chen Wang
Journal:  J Orthop Translat       Date:  2017-12-20       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Results after arthroscopic treatment of iliopsoas impingement after total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  A Zimmerer; M Hauschild; R Nietschke; M M Schneider; G Wassilew; C Sobau; W Miehlke
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2020-10-12       Impact factor: 3.067

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.