Literature DB >> 18751743

Letter to the editor concerning "Independent evaluation of a clinical prediction rule for spinal manipulative therapy: a randomised controlled trial" (M. Hancock et al.).

Jeffrey J Hebert, Stephen M Perle.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2008        PMID： 18751743      PMCID： PMC2556467          DOI： 10.1007/s00586-008-0727-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN： 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


× No keyword cloud information.
  10 in total

1.  A clinical prediction rule to identify patients with low back pain most likely to benefit from spinal manipulation: a validation study.

Authors:  John D Childs; Julie M Fritz; Timothy W Flynn; James J Irrgang; Kevin K Johnson; Guy R Majkowski; Anthony Delitto
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2004-12-21       Impact factor: 25.391

2.  Does clinician treatment choice improve the outcomes of manual therapy for nonspecific low back pain? A metaanalysis.

Authors:  Peter Kent; Darryn Marks; Warrick Pearson; Jenny Keating
Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 1.437

3.  Manual physical therapy: we speak gibberish.

Authors:  Timothy W Flynn; John D Childs; Stephania Bell; Jake S Magel; Robert H Rowe; Haideh Plock
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2008-02-27       Impact factor: 4.751

4.  A clinical prediction rule for classifying patients with low back pain who demonstrate short-term improvement with spinal manipulation.

Authors:  Timothy Flynn; Julie Fritz; Julie Whitman; Robert Wainner; Jake Magel; Daniel Rendeiro; Barbara Butler; Matthew Garber; Stephen Allison
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2002-12-15       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  The use of a lumbar spine manipulation technique by physical therapists in patients who satisfy a clinical prediction rule: a case series.

Authors:  Joshua A Cleland; Julie M Fritz; Julie M Whitman; John D Childs; Jessica A Palmer
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 4.751

6.  Assessment of diclofenac or spinal manipulative therapy, or both, in addition to recommended first-line treatment for acute low back pain: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Mark J Hancock; Chris G Maher; Jane Latimer; Andrew J McLachlan; Chris W Cooper; Richard O Day; Megan F Spindler; James H McAuley
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2007-11-10       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Does the evidence for spinal manipulation translate into better outcomes in routine clinical care for patients with occupational low back pain? A case-control study.

Authors:  Julie M Fritz; Gerard P Brennan; Howard Leaman
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2006 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.166

8.  Independent evaluation of a clinical prediction rule for spinal manipulative therapy: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Mark J Hancock; Christopher G Maher; Jane Latimer; Robert D Herbert; James H McAuley
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-04-22       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 9.  Subgrouping patients with low back pain: evolution of a classification approach to physical therapy.

Authors:  Julie M Fritz; Joshua A Cleland; John D Childs
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 4.751

10.  Pragmatic application of a clinical prediction rule in primary care to identify patients with low back pain with a good prognosis following a brief spinal manipulation intervention.

Authors:  Julie M Fritz; John D Childs; Timothy W Flynn
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2005-07-14       Impact factor: 2.497
  10 in total
  1 in total

1.  No Differences in Outcomes in People with Low Back Pain Who Met the Clinical Prediction Rule for Lumbar Spine Manipulation When a Pragmatic Non-thrust Manipulation Was Used as the Comparator.

Authors:  Kenneth Learman; Christopher Showalter; Bryan O'Halloran; Megan Donaldson; Chad Cook
Journal:  Physiother Can       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 1.037
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.