Literature DB >> 1873393

Characteristics of a genetic polymorphism for reproductive photoresponsiveness in the white-footed mouse (Peromyscus leucopus).

P D Heideman1, F H Bronson.   

Abstract

Wild populations of Peromyscus are often composed of individuals that vary greatly in their reproductive response to photoperiod. A population of white-footed mice (P. leucopus) from Michigan (43 degrees N) was subjected to mass selection in the laboratory both for and against reproductive photoresponsiveness for four generations. The first generation of selection yielded one line of mice in which about 80% of the individuals were classified as reproductively photoresponsive (i.e., with undeveloped reproductive tracts when reared in short days, 8L: 16D) and another in which only about 20% were reproductively photoresponsive. Some and perhaps most of this difference was accounted for by changes in degree of responsiveness to photoperiod rather than by alterations in the proportion of discrete responsive vs. unresponsive phenotypes. Alteration of critical day length was not a factor. Three more generations of selection failed to change the proportions noted above significantly. Although the genetic control of reproductive photoresponsiveness is undoubtedly complex, a single variable locus may be responsible for much of the heritable variation present in this population. These results also suggest that natural populations contain genetically determined phenotypes that are intermediate between absolutely photoresponsive and absolutely unresponsive. The factors that might promote maintenance of heterogeneity of reproductive photoresponsiveness in a wild population of rodents are considered.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1873393     DOI: 10.1095/biolreprod44.6.1189

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Reprod        ISSN: 0006-3363            Impact factor:   4.285


  6 in total

1.  Phenotypic plasticity of reproductive traits in response to food availability and photoperiod in white-footed mice (Peromyscus leucopus).

Authors:  Sarah J Reilly; Robert Oum; Paul D Heideman
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2006-09-06       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Differences in the reaction of collared lemmings Dicrostonyx torquatus to changes in the photoperiod.

Authors:  M I Cheprakov
Journal:  Dokl Biol Sci       Date:  2008 Jul-Aug

3.  Climate change and seasonal reproduction in mammals.

Authors:  F H Bronson
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-11-27       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Variation in levels of luteinizing hormone and reproductive photoresponsiveness in a population of white-footed mice (Peromyscus leucopus).

Authors:  Paul D Heideman; Julian T Pittman; Kristin A Schubert; Christen M R Dubois; Jennifer Bowles; Sean M Lowe; Matthew R Price
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2010-03-31       Impact factor: 3.619

5.  Genetic variation in male sexual behaviour in a population of white-footed mice in relation to photoperiod.

Authors:  Kathy Sharp; Donna Bucci; Paul K Zelensky; Alanna Chesney; Wendy Tidhar; David R Broussard; Paul D Heideman
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2015-06-01       Impact factor: 2.844

6.  Polymorphism of winter phenotype in Siberian hamster: consecutive litters do not differ in photoresponsiveness but prolonged acclimation to long photoperiod inhibits winter molt.

Authors:  Anna S Przybylska-Piech; Michał S Wojciechowski; Małgorzata Jefimow
Journal:  Front Zool       Date:  2021-03-18       Impact factor: 3.172

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.