Literature DB >> 18728579

Accuracy of motor axon regeneration across autograft, single-lumen, and multichannel poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) nerve tubes.

Godard C de Ruiter1, Robert J Spinner, Martijn J A Malessy, Michael J Moore, Eric J Sorenson, Bradford L Currier, Michael J Yaszemski, Anthony J Windebank.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The accuracy of motor axon regeneration becomes an important issue in the development of a nerve tube for motor nerve repair. Dispersion of regeneration across the nerve tube may lead to misdirection and polyinnervation. In this study, we present a series of methods to investigate the accuracy of regeneration, which we used to compare regeneration across autografts and single-lumen poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) nerve tubes. We also present the concept of the multichannel nerve tube that may limit dispersion by separately guiding groups of regenerating axons.
METHODS: The simultaneous tracing of the tibial and peroneal nerves with fast blue and diamidino yellow was performed 8 weeks after the repair of a 1-cm nerve gap in the rat sciatic nerve to determine the percentage of double-projecting motoneurons. Sequential tracing of the peroneal nerve with diamidino yellow 1 week before repair and fast blue 8 weeks after repair was performed to determine the percentage of correctly directed peroneal motoneurons.
RESULTS: In the cases in which there was successful regeneration across single-lumen nerve tubes, more motoneurons had double projections to both the tibial and peroneal nerve branches after single-lumen nerve tube repair (21.4%) than after autograft repair (5.9%). After multichannel nerve tube repair, this percentage was slightly reduced (16.9%), although not significantly. The direction of regeneration was nonspecific after all types of repair.
CONCLUSION: Retrograde tracing techniques provide new insights into the process of regeneration across nerve tubes. The methods and data presented in this study can be used as a basis for the development of a nerve tube for motor nerve repair.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18728579      PMCID: PMC3463233          DOI: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000335081.47352.78

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurgery        ISSN: 0148-396X            Impact factor:   4.654


  38 in total

1.  The fabrication and characterization of linearly oriented nerve guidance scaffolds for spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Shula Stokols; Mark H Tuszynski
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 12.479

2.  The fate of Schwann cell basement membranes in permanently transected nerves.

Authors:  C Giannini; P J Dyck
Journal:  J Neuropathol Exp Neurol       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 3.685

3.  Neurotube for facial nerve repair.

Authors:  Massimo Navissano; Fabrizio Malan; Riccardo Carnino; Bruno Battiston
Journal:  Microsurgery       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.425

4.  Accuracy of reinnervation by peripheral nerve axons regenerating across a 10-mm gap within an impermeable chamber.

Authors:  M Rende; A Granato; M Lo Monaco; G Zelano; A Toesca
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 5.330

5.  Methods for in vitro characterization of multichannel nerve tubes.

Authors:  Godard C de Ruiter; Irene A Onyeneho; Ellen T Liang; Michael J Moore; Andrew M Knight; Martijn J A Malessy; Robert J Spinner; Lichun Lu; Bradford L Currier; Michael J Yaszemski; Anthony J Windebank
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2008-03-01       Impact factor: 4.396

6.  Misdirection of regenerating motor axons after nerve injury and repair in the rat sciatic nerve model.

Authors:  Godard C W de Ruiter; Martijn J A Malessy; Awad O Alaid; Robert J Spinner; JaNean K Engelstad; E J Sorenson; K R Kaufman; Peter J Dyck; Anthony J Windebank
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  2008-01-08       Impact factor: 5.330

7.  Wire mesh as a post-operative physiotherapy assistive device following peripheral nerve graft repair in the rat.

Authors:  S R Strasberg; O Watanabe; S E Mackinnon; G Tarasidis; M C Hertl; M R Wells
Journal:  J Peripher Nerv Syst       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 3.494

Review 8.  Synthetic nerve guide implants in humans: a comprehensive survey.

Authors:  Burkhard Schlosshauer; Lars Dreesmann; Hans-Eberhard Schaller; Nektarios Sinis
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 4.654

9.  Fast blue and diamidino yellow as retrograde tracers in peripheral nerves: efficacy of combined nerve injection and capsule application to transected nerves in the adult rat.

Authors:  A Puigdellívol-Sánchez; A Prats-Galino; D Ruano-Gil; C Molander
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2000-02-15       Impact factor: 2.390

10.  Persistence of tracer in the application site--a potential confounding factor in nerve regeneration studies.

Authors:  Anna Puigdellívol-Sánchez; Alberto Prats-Galino; Domingo Ruano-Gil; Carl Molander
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2003-07-15       Impact factor: 2.390

View more
  21 in total

Review 1.  A biomaterials approach to peripheral nerve regeneration: bridging the peripheral nerve gap and enhancing functional recovery.

Authors:  W Daly; L Yao; D Zeugolis; A Windebank; A Pandit
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2011-11-16       Impact factor: 4.118

2.  Development of channeled nanofibrous scaffolds for oriented tissue engineering.

Authors:  Chenghui Sun; Xiaobing Jin; Jeremy M Holzwarth; Xiaohua Liu; Jiang Hu; Melanie J Gupte; Yaoming Zhao; Peter X Ma
Journal:  Macromol Biosci       Date:  2012-04-16       Impact factor: 4.979

Review 3.  Progress and perspectives of neural tissue engineering.

Authors:  Xiaosong Gu
Journal:  Front Med       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 4.592

4.  In vitro and in vivo release of nerve growth factor from biodegradable poly-lactic-co-glycolic-acid microspheres.

Authors:  Ralph de Boer; Andrew M Knight; Robert J Spinner; Martijn J A Malessy; Michael J Yaszemski; Anthony J Windebank
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2010-09-28       Impact factor: 4.396

Review 5.  Topography, cell response, and nerve regeneration.

Authors:  Diane Hoffman-Kim; Jennifer A Mitchel; Ravi V Bellamkonda
Journal:  Annu Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2010-08-15       Impact factor: 9.590

6.  The development of electrically conductive polycaprolactone fumarate-polypyrrole composite materials for nerve regeneration.

Authors:  M Brett Runge; Mahrokh Dadsetan; Jonas Baltrusaitis; Andrew M Knight; Terry Ruesink; Eric A Lazcano; Lichun Lu; Anthony J Windebank; Michael J Yaszemski
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2010-05-21       Impact factor: 12.479

7.  Implantation of cauda equina nerve roots through a biodegradable scaffold at the conus medullaris in rat.

Authors:  Peter J Grahn; Sandeep Vaishya; Andrew M Knight; Bingkun K Chen; Ann M Schmeichel; Bradford L Currier; Robert J Spinner; Michael J Yaszemski; Anthony J Windebank
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2014-02-06       Impact factor: 4.166

8.  Material properties and electrical stimulation regimens of polycaprolactone fumarate-polypyrrole scaffolds as potential conductive nerve conduits.

Authors:  Philipp Moroder; M Brett Runge; Huan Wang; Terry Ruesink; Lichun Lu; Robert J Spinner; Anthony J Windebank; Michael J Yaszemski
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2010-10-20       Impact factor: 8.947

Review 9.  Designing ideal conduits for peripheral nerve repair.

Authors:  Godard C W de Ruiter; Martijn J A Malessy; Michael J Yaszemski; Anthony J Windebank; Robert J Spinner
Journal:  Neurosurg Focus       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 4.047

10.  Use of Vascularized Sural Nerve Grafts for Sciatic Nerve Reconstruction After Malignant Bone and Soft Tissue Tumor Resection in the Lower Legs.

Authors:  Hideki Tokumoto; Shinsuke Akita; Yoshitaka Kubota; Motone Kuriyama; Nobuyuki Mitsukawa
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 1.539

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.