Literature DB >> 18728521

Assessing the validity of clinical trials.

Anthony K Akobeng1.   

Abstract

Clinical trials use scientific methods to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of treatments or other interventions. Trials should have both internal and external validity, and a well-conducted randomised controlled trial is considered to be the most powerful tool for evaluating interventions. Systematic error (bias) and random error could threaten the internal validity of trials, and all efforts should be made to minimise these in the design, conduct, and analysis of studies. Careful attention should be paid to issues such as randomisation, allocation concealment, blinding, and sample size. In an internally valid trial, external validity refers to the ability of the results to be generalised to the "real world" population. Issues to consider in determining the external validity of a study include the setting of the trial, the study population, the types of interventions used, duration of follow-up, and the types of outcome and how they were assessed.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18728521     DOI: 10.1097/MPG.0b013e31816c749f

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr        ISSN: 0277-2116            Impact factor:   2.839


  19 in total

1.  Using Evidence to Recommend Interventions for Long-term Weight Control in Overweight Children.

Authors:  Nuananong Seal; Marion Broome
Journal:  J Nurse Pract       Date:  2011-04-01       Impact factor: 0.767

2.  Perspective on the cost-effectiveness of transapical aortic valve implantation in high-risk patients: Outcomes of a decision-analytic model.

Authors:  Hemal Gada; Shikhar Agarwal; Thomas H Marwick
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2012-07

3.  How does a clinical trial fit into the real world? The RELAX-AHF study population into the EAHFE registry.

Authors:  Òscar Miró; Víctor Gil; Christian Müller; Alexander Mebazaa; Héctor Bueno; Francisco Javier Martín-Sánchez; Pablo Herrero; Javier Jacob; Pere Llorens
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2015-04-24       Impact factor: 5.460

Review 4.  Outcomes following the treatment of bicondylar tibial plateau fractures with fine wire circular frame external fixation compared to open reduction and internal fixation: A systematic review.

Authors:  Tarek Boutefnouchet; Ayaz S Lakdawala; Panayiotis Makrides
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2015-02-24

5.  A pilot randomized controlled trial of aerobic exercise as an adjunct to OCD treatment.

Authors:  Ana M Abrantes; Richard A Brown; David R Strong; Nicole McLaughlin; Sarah L Garnaat; Maria Mancebo; Deborah Riebe; Julie Desaulniers; Agustin G Yip; Steven Rasmussen; Benjamin D Greenberg
Journal:  Gen Hosp Psychiatry       Date:  2017-06-23       Impact factor: 3.238

6.  How Important Is Randomization of Swallows During Kinematic Analyses of Swallow Function?

Authors:  Cara Donohue; James L Coyle
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2020-06-24       Impact factor: 2.408

7.  Mind-Body Therapies and Osteoarthritis of the Knee.

Authors:  Terry Kit Selfe; Kim E Innes
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rev       Date:  2009-11-01

8.  Internal and external validity: can you apply research study results to your patients?

Authors:  Cecilia Maria Patino; Juliana Carvalho Ferreira
Journal:  J Bras Pneumol       Date:  2018 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.624

9.  Outcome reporting patterns in total knee arthroplasty: A systematic review.

Authors:  Sravya P Vajapey; Jesse Morris; Andrew I Spitzer; Andrew H Glassman; Nicholas J Greco; Mengnai Li
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2020-05-20

Review 10.  A systematic review of triage-related interventions to improve patient flow in emergency departments.

Authors:  Sven Oredsson; Håkan Jonsson; Jon Rognes; Lars Lind; Katarina E Göransson; Anna Ehrenberg; Kjell Asplund; Maaret Castrén; Nasim Farrohknia
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2011-07-19       Impact factor: 2.953

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.