Literature DB >> 1872778

Randomized trial of 2 hormonal and 2 prostaglandin-inhibiting agents in women with a complaint of menorrhagia.

I S Fraser1, G McCarron.   

Abstract

A series of 45 ovulatory women with a complaint of menorrhagia were randomized into 3 treatment groups, before receiving therapy with mefenamic acid in 2 cycles and 1 of 3 other agents in 2 cycles: naproxen (group 1; n = 14), a low dose monophasic combined oral contraceptive (group 2; n = 12) or low dose danazol (group 3; n = 12). Menstrual blood loss was measured in 2-4 control cycles and during therapy. Mefenamic acid reduced measured blood loss by 20%; 38%; and 39% in groups 1-3 respectively. Naproxen reduced blood loss by 12%; the oral contraceptive by 43%; and danazol by 49%. There was no statistically significant difference in blood loss reduction (mean of 2 cycles) between any of the treatments, although women on danazol experienced a dramatic and highly significant further reduction in blood loss after the first treatment cycle (p less than 0.003). These were all effective therapies in a majority of women, but some 'non-responders' were seen in each group. The 'non-responders' had a significantly lower pretreatment blood loss than responders. Several women in group 1 showed anomalous responses to prostaglandin inhibitors with consistent and substantial exacerbation of menorrhagia during therapy. A number of reasonable therapies exist for the medical treatment of menorrhagia, but because none is suitable for everyone management needs to be individualized for each patient.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1872778     DOI: 10.1111/j.1479-828x.1991.tb02769.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol        ISSN: 0004-8666            Impact factor:   2.100


  21 in total

Review 1.  Managing menorrhagia.

Authors:  A Coulter; A Long; J Kelland; S O'Meara; M Sculpher; F Song; T A Sheldon
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1995-09

2.  Practice patterns and attitudes about treating abnormal uterine bleeding: a national survey of obstetricians and gynecologists.

Authors:  Kristen A Matteson; Britta L Anderson; Stephanie B Pinto; Vrishali Lopes; Jay Schulkin; Melissa A Clark
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011-05-14       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 3.  Contraception in women over 40 years of age.

Authors:  Rebecca H Allen; Carrie A Cwiak; Andrew M Kaunitz
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2013-03-04       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for heavy menstrual bleeding.

Authors:  Magdalena Bofill Rodriguez; Anne Lethaby; Cindy Farquhar
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-09-19

Review 5.  Contraception technology: past, present and future.

Authors:  Regine Sitruk-Ware; Anita Nath; Daniel R Mishell
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2012-09-17       Impact factor: 3.375

Review 6.  A benefit-risk review of systemic haemostatic agents: part 2: in excessive or heavy menstrual bleeding.

Authors:  Ian S Fraser; Robert J Porte; Peter A Kouides; Andrea S Lukes
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 7.  Benefits and risks of pharmacological agents used for the treatment of menorrhagia.

Authors:  Samendra Nath Roy; Siladitya Bhattacharya
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 5.606

8.  Heavy menstrual flow: current and future trends in management.

Authors:  Yusuf Beebeejaun; Rajesh Varma
Journal:  Rev Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2013

Review 9.  Danazol for heavy menstrual bleeding.

Authors:  H Beaumont; C Augood; K Duckitt; A Lethaby
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2007-07-18

Review 10.  Surgery versus medical therapy for heavy menstrual bleeding.

Authors:  Jane Marjoribanks; Anne Lethaby; Cindy Farquhar
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-01-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.