BACKGROUND: Monocyte activation in cancer patients may be reflective of anticancer activity. However, studies indicate that recruitment of macrophages can actually promote tumor growth and angiogenesis. Assessment of other microenvironmental cells such as circulating endothelial cells (CECs) may provide additional information regarding disease progression. The objective of this study was to assess monocyte activation and CECs in breast cancer patients and determine the potential clinical relevance during disease progression. METHODS: Patients (n = 41) with localized or metastatic breast cancer who were not currently receiving treatment were eligible for study inclusion. Peripheral blood was collected and analyzed by flow cytometry for monocyte activation (Leuko64 assay kit), and for CECs (CD146(+)CD45(-) phenotype). RESULTS: Metastatic breast cancer patients demonstrated a higher monocyte CD64 index relative to normal donors and localized breast cancer patients (P < 0.05). Furthermore, breast cancer patients had a lower monocyte CD163 index relative to normal donors (P = 0.008). Localized breast cancer patients demonstrated higher levels of CD146(+)CD45(-) cells CECs relative to metastatic breast cancer patients and normal donors. Within the localized breast cancer population, levels of CD146(+)CD45(-) cells increased with disease stage (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that monocyte activation and CECs may play a role in breast cancer progression. We speculate that monocyte activation may reflect a reaction to metastatic cells and/or response to tissue damage caused by metastatic growth in distant organs. Furthermore, the observation that CECs increase with disease stage in localized breast cancer suggests that CECs could be a useful surrogate marker for disease progression in this patient population. 2008 Clinical Cytometry Society.
BACKGROUND: Monocyte activation in cancerpatients may be reflective of anticancer activity. However, studies indicate that recruitment of macrophages can actually promote tumor growth and angiogenesis. Assessment of other microenvironmental cells such as circulating endothelial cells (CECs) may provide additional information regarding disease progression. The objective of this study was to assess monocyte activation and CECs in breast cancerpatients and determine the potential clinical relevance during disease progression. METHODS:Patients (n = 41) with localized or metastatic breast cancer who were not currently receiving treatment were eligible for study inclusion. Peripheral blood was collected and analyzed by flow cytometry for monocyte activation (Leuko64 assay kit), and for CECs (CD146(+)CD45(-) phenotype). RESULTS:Metastatic breast cancerpatients demonstrated a higher monocyte CD64 index relative to normal donors and localized breast cancerpatients (P < 0.05). Furthermore, breast cancerpatients had a lower monocyte CD163 index relative to normal donors (P = 0.008). Localized breast cancerpatients demonstrated higher levels of CD146(+)CD45(-) cells CECs relative to metastatic breast cancerpatients and normal donors. Within the localized breast cancer population, levels of CD146(+)CD45(-) cells increased with disease stage (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that monocyte activation and CECs may play a role in breast cancer progression. We speculate that monocyte activation may reflect a reaction to metastatic cells and/or response to tissue damage caused by metastatic growth in distant organs. Furthermore, the observation that CECs increase with disease stage in localized breast cancer suggests that CECs could be a useful surrogate marker for disease progression in this patient population. 2008 Clinical Cytometry Society.
Authors: Thomas Resch; Andreas Pircher; Christian M Kähler; Johann Pratschke; Wolfgang Hilbe Journal: Stem Cell Rev Rep Date: 2012-09 Impact factor: 5.739
Authors: Emma Tippett; Wan-Jung Cheng; Clare Westhorpe; Paul U Cameron; Bruce J Brew; Sharon R Lewin; Anthony Jaworowski; Suzanne M Crowe Journal: PLoS One Date: 2011-05-20 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: B Rovati; S Mariucci; S Delfanti; D Grasso; C Tinelli; C Torre; M De Amici; P Pedrazzoli Journal: Cell Oncol (Dordr) Date: 2016-01-14 Impact factor: 6.730