Literature DB >> 18726792

"We wanted a birth experience, not a medical experience": exploring Canadian women's use of midwifery.

Diana C Parry1.   

Abstract

In this study I explore Canadian women's use of midwifery to examine whether their choice represents a resistance to the medicalization of pregnancy/childbirth. Through my analysis of the data I identified eight ways the women's deliberate decision to pursue midwifery care represented resistance to medicalization. In so doing, I demonstrate how women actively assert their agency over reproduction thus shaping their own reproductive health experiences. The outcome of their resistance and resultant use of midwifery was empowerment. Theoretically the research contributes to understanding the intentionality of resistance and a continuum of resistant behavior.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18726792     DOI: 10.1080/07399330802269451

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Care Women Int        ISSN: 0739-9332


  15 in total

1.  Experience of Vaginal Birth After Cesarean: A Phenomenological Study.

Authors:  Silvio Simeone; Filomena Stile; Guillari Assunta; Gianpaolo Gargiulo; Teresa Rea
Journal:  J Perinat Educ       Date:  2019-07-01

2.  U.S. Nulliparas' Reasons for Expected Provider Type and Childbirth Setting.

Authors:  Adriana Arcia
Journal:  J Perinat Educ       Date:  2015

3.  The facilitating factors and barriers encountered in the adoption of a humanized birth care approach in a highly specialized university affiliated hospital.

Authors:  Roxana Behruzi; Marie Hatem; Lise Goulet; William Fraser
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2011-11-25       Impact factor: 2.809

4.  Women's and care providers' perspectives of quality prenatal care: a qualitative descriptive study.

Authors:  Wendy Sword; Maureen I Heaman; Sandy Brooks; Suzanne Tough; Patricia A Janssen; David Young; Dawn Kingston; Michael E Helewa; Noori Akhtar-Danesh; Eileen Hutton
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2012-04-13       Impact factor: 3.007

5.  Newborn Screening Knowledge and Attitudes Among Midwives and Out-of-Hospital-Birth Parents.

Authors:  Elena Coupal; Kim Hart; Bob Wong; Erin Rothwell
Journal:  J Perinat Neonatal Nurs       Date:  2020 Oct/Dec       Impact factor: 2.522

6.  Proportion of neonatal readmission attributed to length of stay for childbirth: a population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Amy Metcalfe; Matthews Mathai; Shiliang Liu; Juan Andres Leon; K S Joseph
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-09-14       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Remote Monitoring of Hypertension Diseases in Pregnancy: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Dorien Lanssens; Thijs Vandenberk; Christophe Jp Smeets; Hélène De Cannière; Geert Molenberghs; Anne Van Moerbeke; Anne van den Hoogen; Tiziana Robijns; Sharona Vonck; Anneleen Staelens; Valerie Storms; Inge M Thijs; Lars Grieten; Wilfried Gyselaers
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 4.773

8.  Midwives', Obstetricians', and Recently Delivered Mothers' Perceptions of Remote Monitoring for Prenatal Care: Retrospective Survey.

Authors:  Dorien Lanssens; Thijs Vandenberk; Joy Lodewijckx; Tessa Peeters; Valerie Storms; Inge M Thijs; Lars Grieten; Wilfried Gyselaers
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2019-04-15       Impact factor: 5.428

9.  Impact of prenatal care provider on the use of ancillary health services during pregnancy.

Authors:  Amy Metcalfe; Kristen Grabowska; Carol Weller; Suzanne C Tough
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2013-03-11       Impact factor: 3.007

10.  Pregnant women's navigation of information on everyday household chemicals: phthalates as a case study.

Authors:  Justin M Ashley; Alexandra Hodgson; Sapna Sharma; Jeff Nisker
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2015-11-25       Impact factor: 3.007

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.