Literature DB >> 18726734

Routine procedures in NICUs: factors influencing pain assessment and ranking by pain intensity.

Eva Cignacco1, Jan P H Hamers, Lilian Stoffel, Richard A van Lingen, Natascha Schütz, Romano Müller, Luc J I Zimmermann, Mathias Nelle.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pain associated with routine procedures in NICUs is often inadequately managed. Barriers to more appropriate pain management are nurses' and physicians' knowledge and the challenges of collaborative decision-making. Few studies describe the differing perceptions of procedural pain intensity among nurses and physicians in NICUs which could complicate common decision-making. This study set out to explore the factors influencing pain intensity assessment and to gain insight into a possible pain intensity classification of routine procedures in the NICU.
METHOD: A survey was conducted among 431 neonatal health care professionals from 4 tertiary level NICUs. Each routine procedure was assessed on a 10-point visual analogue scale (VAS) assuming absence of analgesia.
RESULTS: Multiple ANCOVA models showed that nurses rated 19 of the 27 procedures as significantly more painful than did physicians (p<0.05). We found no differences in pain assessment based on professional experience, gender or age. Of the 27 procedures listed, 70% were rated as painful and 44% were judged very painful. Ranking and classification of the pain intensity of routine procedures were drawn up. The general ranking of the median across all procedures shows that "insertion of a thoracic drain" is assessed as the most painful procedure.
CONCLUSIONS: The majority of routine procedures in an NICU are considered to be painful. Nurses generally rate procedures as more painful than do physicians. This difference in assessment deserves exploration in regard to its impact on collaborative decision-making in neonate pain management.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18726734     DOI: 2008/33/smw-12147

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Swiss Med Wkly        ISSN: 0036-7672            Impact factor:   2.193


  7 in total

1.  Oral glucose in preterm neonates during oropharyngeal suctioning: a randomized controlled cross-over trial.

Authors:  Katharina Vezyroglou; Katrin Mehler; Angela Kribs; Ingrid Becker; Kristina Langhammer; Bernhard Roth; Christoph Hünseler
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2014-12-19       Impact factor: 3.183

2.  Endotracheal suctioning in preterm infants using four-handed versus routine care.

Authors:  Sharon Cone; Rita H Pickler; Mary Jo Grap; Jacqueline McGrath; Paul M Wiley
Journal:  J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs       Date:  2013 Jan-Feb

3.  The utility of pain scores obtained during 'regular reassessment process' in premature infants in the NICU.

Authors:  A J Rohan
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2014-04-10       Impact factor: 2.521

4.  The effect of endotracheal tube suctioning education of nurses on decreasing pain in premature neonates.

Authors:  Zahra S Hadian; Raheleh S Sabet
Journal:  Iran J Pediatr       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 0.364

5.  A complex interprofessional intervention to improve the management of painful procedures in neonates.

Authors:  Colette Balice-Bourgois; Christopher J Newman; Giacomo D Simonetti; Maya Zumstein-Shaha
Journal:  Paediatr Neonatal Pain       Date:  2020-01-13

6.  Individual contextual factors in the validation of the Bernese pain scale for neonates: protocol for a prospective observational study.

Authors:  Eva Cignacco; Karin Schenk; Bonnie Stevens; Liliane Stoffel; Dirk Bassler; Sven Schulzke; Mathias Nelle
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2017-07-19       Impact factor: 2.125

Review 7.  Pain in Neonates: A Concept Analysis.

Authors:  Siti Yuyun Rahayu Fitri; Lely Lusmilasari; Mohammad Juffrie; Windy Rakhmawati
Journal:  Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2019-08-13
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.