Literature DB >> 18726549

Assistive devices: usage in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

I G de Boer1, A J Peeters, H K Ronday, B J A Mertens, T W J Huizinga, T P M Vliet Vlieland.   

Abstract

We describe the usage of various assistive devices and identify factors associated with usage in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). A cross-sectional, multicentre study was performed in three outpatient rheumatology clinics in the Netherlands. Two hundred forty patients with RA participated in the study. The main measures were questionnaires and a semi-structured interview regarding the possession and usage of 21 common assistive devices in the ISO9999 categories orthopaedic footwear, personal care, mobility, household and adaptations for housing. Potential factors associated with usage included sociodemographic variables, health status, quality of life, coping strategies, self-efficacy, outcome expectations and satisfaction. Out of 240 patients, 213 (89%) had one or more assistive devices in possession (median number of devices 3.0, interquartile range 3.0). The proportions of patients never using a device in possession varied between 8% for orthopaedic insoles and 23% for grab bars. The main factors related to usage varied among categories, but common determinants were a specific impairment or disability, satisfaction with the device or related services, self-efficacy and the number of devices in possession. In conclusion, in patients with RA, possession rates are high, with 23% or less of the devices in possession being abandoned. Overall, satisfaction rates were high. Factors associated with usage varied among categories and comprised, apart from the number of devices in possession and variables related to health status, also aspects of satisfaction with the device or related services or self-efficacy. The latter findings underline the need for a systematic evaluation of the outcomes of assistive devices by prescribing health professionals or suppliers in every individual case.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18726549     DOI: 10.1007/s10067-008-0989-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Rheumatol        ISSN: 0770-3198            Impact factor:   2.980


  19 in total

1.  Modified disease activity scores that include twenty-eight-joint counts. Development and validation in a prospective longitudinal study of patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  M L Prevoo; M A van 't Hof; H H Kuper; M A van Leeuwen; L B van de Putte; P L van Riel
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  1995-01

2.  Self report functional disability scores and the use of devices: two distinct aspects of physical function in rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  A van der Heide; J W Jacobs; G A van Albada-Kuipers; F W Kraaimaat; R Geenen; J W Bijlsma
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 19.103

3.  The RAND 36-Item Health Survey 1.0.

Authors:  R D Hays; C D Sherbourne; R M Mazel
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 3.046

4.  Evaluation of a Dutch version of the AIMS2 for patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  R P Riemsma; E Taal; J J Rasker; P M Houtman; H C Van Paassen; O Wiegman
Journal:  Br J Rheumatol       Date:  1996-08

5.  Assessments of disability in women with rheumatoid arthritis in relation to grip force and pain.

Authors:  U Nordenskiöld; G Grimby
Journal:  Disabil Rehabil       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 3.033

6.  Determinants of the use of wrist working splints in rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Martine M Veehof; Erik Taal; Marjanne J Willems; Mart A F J van de Laar
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2008-04-15

7.  Use of aids during the first three months after total hip replacement.

Authors:  R J Haworth
Journal:  Br J Rheumatol       Date:  1983-02

8.  Survey of the use and effect of assistive devices in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis: a two-year followup of women and men.

Authors:  Ingrid Thyberg; Ursula A M Hass; Ulla Nordenskiöld; Thomas Skogh
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2004-06-15

9.  What determines the possession of assistive devices among patients with rheumatic diseases? The influence of the country-related health care system.

Authors:  Martine M Veehof; Erik Taal; Johannes J Rasker; Johannes Lohmann; Mart A F J Van De Laar
Journal:  Disabil Rehabil       Date:  2006-02-28       Impact factor: 3.033

Review 10.  Assistive technology device use in patients with rheumatic disease: a literature review.

Authors:  J C Rogers; M B Holm
Journal:  Am J Occup Ther       Date:  1992-02
View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Arthritis, foot pain and shoe wear: current musculoskeletal research on feet.

Authors:  Jody Riskowski; Alyssa B Dufour; Marian T Hannan
Journal:  Curr Opin Rheumatol       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 5.006

Review 2.  Patient Compliance With Wearing Lower Limb Assistive Devices: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Ayisha Z Bashir; Danae M Dinkel; Iraklis I Pipinos; Jason M Johanning; Sara A Myers
Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther       Date:  2022-06-24       Impact factor: 1.300

3.  Societal participation in ehlers-danlos syndromes and hypermobility spectrum disorder, compared to fibromyalgia and healthy controls.

Authors:  Stijn De Baets; Ellen Cruyt; Patrick Calders; Inge Dewandele; Fransiska Malfait; Guy Vanderstraeten; Geert Van Hove; Dominique van De Velde
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-06-16       Impact factor: 3.752

4.  Erosions in the foot at baseline are predictive of orthopaedic shoe use after 10 years of treat to target therapy in patients with recent onset rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Sytske Anne Bergstra; Iris M Markusse; Gülşah Akdemir; H Karel Ronday; K Huub Han; Willem F Lems; Pit J S M Kerstens; Rosaline van den Berg; Robert B M Landewé; Cornelia F Allaart
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2015-12-22       Impact factor: 2.980

Review 5.  Self-efficacy and arthritis disability: An updated synthesis of the evidence base and its relevance to optimal patient care.

Authors:  Ray Marks
Journal:  Health Psychol Open       Date:  2014-12-23

6.  Medical-grade footwear: the impact of fit and comfort.

Authors:  Bessie Hurst; Helen Branthwaite; Andrew Greenhalgh; Nachiappan Chockalingam
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2017-01-05       Impact factor: 2.303

7.  The use of evidence-based guidance to enable reliable and accurate measurements of the home environment.

Authors:  Georgia Spiliotopoulou; Anita Atwal; Anne McIntyre
Journal:  Br J Occup Ther       Date:  2017-11-14       Impact factor: 1.243

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.