| Literature DB >> 18726003 |
Bingwei Sun1, Xiangqian Zou, Yueling Chen, Ping Zhang, Gengsheng Shi.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effects and potential mechanisms of preconditioning of tricarbonyldichlororuthenium (III) dimer (CORM-2)-liberated CO on LPS-induced activation of endothelial cells (HUVEC).Entities:
Keywords: ICAM-1; NF-κB; carbon monoxide; oxidative stress; preconditioning
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2008 PMID: 18726003 PMCID: PMC2519837 DOI: 10.7150/ijbs.4.270
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Biol Sci ISSN: 1449-2288 Impact factor: 6.580
Fig 1Effects of CORM-2 pretreatment on induction of intracellular oxidative stress (ROS) and NO production in LPS-stimulated HUVEC. Confluent HUVEC monolayers (48-well cell culture dishes) were pretreated with CORM-2 (50 and 100μM) for 2h. Subsequently, HUVEC were washed and loaded with DHR123 or DAF-FM for additional 1h. Then, HUVEC were stimulated with LPS (10μg/ml) for 4hrs and oxidative stress (DHR123 oxidation) and NO production (DAF-FM nitration) were assessed. In some experiments, naïve (not-pretreated) HUVEC were stimulated with LPS in the presence of CORM-2 (50 and 100μM). Note that pretreatment of HUVEC with CORM-2 reduced oxidative stress (A) and NO production (B) in response to LPS stimulation. All values are expressed as mean ± SD (n = 4). #p <0.05 as compared to LPS; *p <0.05 as compared to co-incubation with 50 μM CORM-2; * *p <0.05 as compared to co-incubation with 100 μM CORM-2.
Fig 2Effects of CORM-2 pretreatment on iNOS and HO-1 expression in LPS-stimulated HUVEC. The experimental conditions were the same as described in Fig.1. iNOS and HO-1 expression were determined by Western blot. Note that pretreatment of HUVEC with CORM-2 resulted in more effective inhibition of iNOS protein expression in LPS stimulated HUVEC compare to coincubation group,#p <0.05 as compared to LPS; *p <0.05 as compared to co-incubation with 50 μM CORM-2; * *p <0.05 as compared to co-incubation with 100 μM CORM-2 (A). Both pretreatment and coincubation of CORM-2 significantly upregulated expression of HO-1 in LPS-stimulated HUVECs. Shown is a representative image from three experiments. *p <0.05 as compared to control, # p <0.05 as compared to LPS (B).
Fig 4Effects of CORM-2 pretreatment on NF-kB activation in LPS-stimulated HUVEC. HUVEC were grown in 60 mm Petri dishes until confluence and pretreated with CORM-2 (50 and 100μM) for 2 h. The control HUVECs were treated with the vehicle only. Subsequently, HUVEC were washed and stimulated with LPS (10 µg/ml) for 4 hrs in the presence (coincubation) or absence of CORM-2 (50-100µM). NF-κB activation was assessed by EMSA. Note that LPS-induced activation of NF-κB was effectively prevented in CORM-2-pretreated HUVEC. Shown is a representative image from four experiments. #p <0.05 as compared to LPS; *p <0.05 as compared to co-incubation with 50 μM CORM-2; * *p <0.05 as compared to co-incubation with 100 μM CORM-2.
Fig 5Effects of CORM-2 pretreatment on PMN adhesion to LPS-stimulated HUVEC. HUVEC were grown to confluence in 48-well cell culture dishes and pretreated with CORM-2 (50-100µM) for 2 hr. Then HUVEC were washed and stimulated with LPS (10 µg/ml) for additional 4 hrs in the presence (coincubation) or absence of CORM-2. Subsequently, HUVEC were washed and co-incubated with 51Cr-PMN (1×105) for 30 min. Per cent of PMN adhesion to HUVEC was calculated based on the amount of radioactivity remaining in HUVEC monolayers following two subsequent washes. Note that PMN adhesion to LPS-stimulated HUVEC was significantly reduced in CORM-2-pretreated or coincubated HUVEC. All values are expressed as mean ± SE (n = 3). * P<0.01 compared to LPS. *# P>0.05 compared to those coincubated with 50 or 100 μM of CORM-2.