Literature DB >> 18725823

Implementing an intervention to promote colon cancer screening through e-mail over the Internet: lessons learned from a pilot study.

Evelyn C Y Chan1, Sally W Vernon.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Colon cancer screening (CRCS) tests are underused. Multiple CRCS options may confuse patients and lead to inaction. E-mail between patients and physicians may raise awareness about CRCS and allow physicians to answer questions about test options.
OBJECTIVES: To develop and implement an electronic intervention, the InterNet LETter (NetLET), to increase interest in and use of CRCS among patients with and without e-mail access at home or work. RESEARCH
METHODS: During 2004-2005, 97 patients over 49 years old were recruited during a clinic visit. Patients with e-mail at home or work were assigned to the private access arm; patients without e-mail but willing to use the public library system were assigned to the public access arm. Within each arm, patients were randomized to the NetLET or control group. The NetLET consisted of a personalized e-mail from the physician reminding the patient to undergo CRCS and providing a link to a webpage with information about CRCS. Control groups were mailed a reminder letter from their physician. All were mailed a fecal occult blood test (FOBT) kit.
RESULTS: In the public access intervention group, only 1 of 11 patients viewed the NetLET. In the private access intervention group, 10 of 42 viewed it. Eleven of 42 (26%) private access intervention group participants, and 8 of 35 (23%) private access control group participants returned an FOBT. No public access intervention group patients, but 3 of 9 control group patients, returned an FOBT.
CONCLUSIONS: We concluded that it was not feasible to implement the NetLET, but reasons for lack of success differed for the private and public access arms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18725823     DOI: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181805e3c

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Care        ISSN: 0025-7079            Impact factor:   2.983


  12 in total

1.  Finding the minimal intervention needed for sustained mammography adherence.

Authors:  Jennifer M Gierisch; Jessica T DeFrank; J Michael Bowling; Barbara K Rimer; Jeanine M Matuszewski; David Farrell; Celette Sugg Skinner
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 5.043

2.  Evaluation of Interventions Intended to Increase Colorectal Cancer Screening Rates in the United States: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Michael K Dougherty; Alison T Brenner; Seth D Crockett; Shivani Gupta; Stephanie B Wheeler; Manny Coker-Schwimmer; Laura Cubillos; Teri Malo; Daniel S Reuland
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2018-12-01       Impact factor: 21.873

Review 3.  Community-based colorectal cancer screening trials with multi-ethnic groups: a systematic review.

Authors:  Jay B Morrow; Florence J Dallo; Manjula Julka
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2010-12

4.  Electronic patient messages to promote colorectal cancer screening: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Thomas D Sequist; Alan M Zaslavsky; Graham A Colditz; John Z Ayanian
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2010-12-13

5.  Mailed fecal-immunochemical test for colon cancer screening.

Authors:  Jeanette M Daly; Barcey T Levy; Mary L Merchant; Jason Wilbur
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2010-06

6.  A randomized comparison of print and web communication on colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  David S Weinberg; Eileen Keenan; Karen Ruth; Karthik Devarajan; Michelle Rodoletz; Eric J Bieber
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2013-01-28       Impact factor: 21.873

7.  Does access to a colorectal cancer screening website and/or a nurse-managed telephone help line provided to patients by their family physician increase fecal occult blood test uptake?: A pragmatic cluster randomized controlled trial study protocol.

Authors:  Kathleen Clouston; Alan Katz; Patricia J Martens; Jeff Sisler; Donna Turner; Michelle Lobchuk; Susan McClement
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2012-05-17       Impact factor: 4.430

Review 8.  What implementation interventions increase cancer screening rates? a systematic review.

Authors:  Melissa C Brouwers; Carol De Vito; Lavannya Bahirathan; Angela Carol; June C Carroll; Michelle Cotterchio; Maureen Dobbins; Barbara Lent; Cheryl Levitt; Nancy Lewis; S Elizabeth McGregor; Lawrence Paszat; Carol Rand; Nadine Wathen
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2011-09-29       Impact factor: 7.327

Review 9.  Effective interventions to facilitate the uptake of breast, cervical and colorectal cancer screening: an implementation guideline.

Authors:  Melissa C Brouwers; Carol De Vito; Lavannya Bahirathan; Angela Carol; June C Carroll; Michelle Cotterchio; Maureen Dobbins; Barbara Lent; Cheryl Levitt; Nancy Lewis; S Elizabeth McGregor; Lawrence Paszat; Carol Rand; Nadine Wathen
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2011-09-29       Impact factor: 7.327

Review 10.  Factors Influencing the Implementation of Patient Navigation Programs for Adults with Complex Needs: A Scoping Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Kristina M Kokorelias; Jessica E Shiers-Hanley; Jorge Rios; Amanda Knoepfli; Sander L Hitzig
Journal:  Health Serv Insights       Date:  2021-07-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.