PURPOSE: To compare the radiological and functional outcomes of patients who underwent either computer-assisted or conventional total knee arthroplasty (TKA). METHODS: Two groups of 50 patients each underwent either computer-assisted or conventional TKA were retrospectively studied. Patients were matched according to body mass index (BMI), gender, and age. Three senior orthopaedic surgeons with comparable experience performed all surgeries, using 3 different prostheses. The surgical approach and peri- and postoperative regimens were the same. The mechanical axis and the tibial and femoral angles were measured using standardised long-leg weight-bearing radiographs. Overall function was assessed using the Short Form-12 (SF-12) and International Knee Society (IKS) scores. RESULTS: No intra-operative technical difficulties were encountered in either group. The computer-assisted group resulted in more consistent and accurate alignments in both the coronal and sagittal planes and better SF-12 and IKS scores. In obese patients (BMI=30 kg/m2 or more), computer-assisted TKA provided better alignment than the conventional technique. CONCLUSION: Computer-assisted TKA improves implant positioning, limb alignment, and overall functional outcome. It may be particularly advantageous for obese patients.
PURPOSE: To compare the radiological and functional outcomes of patients who underwent either computer-assisted or conventional total knee arthroplasty (TKA). METHODS: Two groups of 50 patients each underwent either computer-assisted or conventional TKA were retrospectively studied. Patients were matched according to body mass index (BMI), gender, and age. Three senior orthopaedic surgeons with comparable experience performed all surgeries, using 3 different prostheses. The surgical approach and peri- and postoperative regimens were the same. The mechanical axis and the tibial and femoral angles were measured using standardised long-leg weight-bearing radiographs. Overall function was assessed using the Short Form-12 (SF-12) and International Knee Society (IKS) scores. RESULTS: No intra-operative technical difficulties were encountered in either group. The computer-assisted group resulted in more consistent and accurate alignments in both the coronal and sagittal planes and better SF-12 and IKS scores. In obesepatients (BMI=30 kg/m2 or more), computer-assisted TKA provided better alignment than the conventional technique. CONCLUSION: Computer-assisted TKA improves implant positioning, limb alignment, and overall functional outcome. It may be particularly advantageous for obesepatients.
Authors: R Iorio; G Bolle; F Conteduca; L Valeo; J Conteduca; D Mazza; A Ferretti Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2012-04-24 Impact factor: 4.342
Authors: Alfonso Manzotti; Pietro Cerveri; Elena De Momi; Chris Pullen; Norberto Confalonieri Journal: Int Orthop Date: 2009-06-10 Impact factor: 3.075
Authors: Christian-Dominik Peterlein; Markus Dietmar Schofer; Susanne Fuchs-Winkelmann; Friedrich Georg Scherf Journal: Chir Organi Mov Date: 2009-10-30
Authors: Jelle P van der List; Harshvardhan Chawla; Leo Joskowicz; Andrew D Pearle Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2016-09-06 Impact factor: 4.342
Authors: Vincent Y Ng; Jeffrey H DeClaire; Keith R Berend; Bethany C Gulick; Adolph V Lombardi Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2012-01 Impact factor: 4.176
Authors: K Lehnen; K Giesinger; R Warschkow; M Porter; E Koch; M S Kuster Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2010-09-18 Impact factor: 4.342