Literature DB >> 18725670

Effect of the Deyo score on outcomes and costs in shoulder arthroplasty patients.

W Humphries1, N Jain, R Pietrobon, F Socolowski, C Cook, L Higgins.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of preoperative comorbidity status (defined by the Deyo index) on hospital mortality, postoperative complications, length of hospital stay, and hospital costs for shoulder arthroplasty patients.
METHODS: The overall mean hospital mortality and postoperative complication rates, and length of hospital stay and hospital costs stratified by the Deyo score were compared using the Pearson Chi squared test and the F-test, respectively. The effects of the Deyo score on hospital mortality and postoperative complications were estimated using multiple logistic regression. The length of hospital stay and hospital costs were estimated using multiple linear regression. The magnitude of the estimated effects of the Deyo score on the 4 outcomes were expressed as crude odds ratios (ORs) and adjusted ORs for age, race, gender, surgeon volume, and hospital volume.
RESULTS: Higher Deyo scores tended to be associated with higher hospital mortality, length of hospital stay, postoperative complications, and hospital costs. Compared with the referent group (Deyo score=0), patients with the highest Deyo scores (5-36) exhibited adjusted ORs of 11.8 for hospital mortality (p=0.011) and 1.1 for developing postoperative complications (p=0.098), and had the highest length of hospital stay (mean, 4.1 days) and hospital costs (mean, US$18,549).
CONCLUSION: The Deyo score was a predictor of outcomes and costs in the shoulder arthroplasty population. By identifying relevant factors, health care providers can better determine who should be referred for shoulder arthroplasty and what should be considered when assessing risks and benefits.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18725670     DOI: 10.1177/230949900801600212

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong)        ISSN: 1022-5536            Impact factor:   1.118


  7 in total

1.  Total shoulder arthroplasty in older patients: increased perioperative morbidity?

Authors:  Eric T Ricchetti; Joseph A Abboud; Andrew F Kuntz; Matthew L Ramsey; David L Glaser; Gerald R Williams
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  The Elixhauser comorbidity method outperforms the Charlson index in predicting inpatient death after orthopaedic surgery.

Authors:  Mariano E Menendez; Valentin Neuhaus; C Niek van Dijk; David Ring
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-05-28       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  A matched-control analysis on the effects of alcohol use disorder following primary reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Electra Nassis; Alexander S Imas; Eric S Roth; Samuel J Swiggett; Asad M Ashraf; Keith B Diamond; Afshin E Razi; Jack Choueka
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2021-02-24

4.  Health care costs in US patients with and without a diagnosis of osteoarthritis.

Authors:  T Kim Le; Leslie B Montejano; Zhun Cao; Yang Zhao; Dennis Ang
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 3.133

5.  Ninety day mortality and its predictors after primary shoulder arthroplasty: an analysis of 4,019 patients from 1976-2008.

Authors:  Jasvinder A Singh; John W Sperling; Robert H Cofield
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2011-10-12       Impact factor: 2.362

6.  Shoulder arthroplasty. Comorbidity as prognostic factor.

Authors:  Matías J Esteras-Serrano; Isabel M Ruiz-Hernández; Josep O Gimferrer-Arriaga; Marcos Sánchez-Jimenez; Aina Far-Riera; J M Rapariz
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2018-08-16

7.  Trends in total shoulder arthroplasty from 2005 to 2018: lower complications rates and shorter lengths of stay despite patients with more comorbidities.

Authors:  Elise C Bixby; Venkat Boddapati; Matthew J J Anderson; John D Mueller; Charles M Jobin; William N Levine
Journal:  JSES Int       Date:  2020-06-07
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.