Literature DB >> 18725159

A closer look at same-day bidirectional endoscopy.

Jennifer Urquhart1, Glenn Eisen, Douglas O Faigel, Nora Mattek, Jennifer Holub, David A Lieberman.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Same-day bidirectional endoscopy (BDE) is commonly used in clinical practice.
OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to determine the frequency, patient demographics, indications, and significant endoscopic findings for patients undergoing BDE.
DESIGN: Retrospective study with a national endoscopic database.
SETTING: Diverse clinical practice settings in the United States, including 75% from private practice. PATIENTS: A total of 591,074 adult patients had upper or lower endoscopy; 66,265 patients (11.2%) with same-day BDE and a subgroup (n = 9067) with a common indication for both upper and lower examinations are the subjects of this analysis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Age, sex, and procedure indication were analyzed in all subjects. Significant endoscopic findings were measured in patients with a single indication of anemia, a positive fecal occult blood test (FOBT), or abdominal pain/dyspepsia (pain) for both upper and lower endoscopy.
METHODS: The Clinical Outcomes Research Initiative (CORI) national endoscopic database was analyzed to determine the number of patients who underwent same-day BDE between 2000 and 2004. Patients with a single indication of anemia, positive fecal occult blood test (FOBT), or abdominal pain/dyspepsia (pain) on both EGD and colonoscopy were included for the analysis of endoscopic findings. Significant upper GI findings were defined as suspected malignancy, arteriovenous malformation (AVM), ulcer, Barrett's esophagus, and stricture. Significant lower GI findings included suspected malignancy, polyp >9 mm, and AVM.
RESULTS: A total of 591,074 patients had upper and/or lower endoscopy; 66,265 patients (11.2%) had same-day BDE. The majority of patients were female (52.1%), and the mean age of patients with BDE was 60.8 years. A total of 6538 patients (9.9%) had anemia, 1169 (1.8%) had a positive FOBT, and 1360 (2.1%) had pain as the sole indication for both examinations. After adjustment for age and sex, significant findings were higher in patients with anemia than in those with pain (odds ratio 1.89; 95% CI, 1.59-2.26) and for patients with positive FOBT versus pain (odds ratio 1.83; 95% CI, 1.48-2.26). LIMITATIONS: Retrospective analysis with possible bias. Fewer patients with pain had significant findings compared to the other two groups (P value <.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: More than 10% of patients undergoing upper or lower endoscopy receive same-day BDE. BDE commonly revealed important conditions in patients with anemia or positive FOBT. Bidirectional endoscopy commonly revealed important pathology in patients with anemia or positive FOBT. Patients with pain had a lower prevalence of serious findings compared to the other groups studied. The benefits of BDE in patients with pain are uncertain and require additional investigation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18725159      PMCID: PMC3853309          DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2008.04.063

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc        ISSN: 0016-5107            Impact factor:   9.427


  17 in total

Review 1.  Occult gastrointestinal bleeding.

Authors:  D C Rockey
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1999-07-01       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  American Gastroenterological Association medical position statement: evaluation and management of occult and obscure gastrointestinal bleeding.

Authors: 
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 22.682

3.  The role of endoscopy in dyspepsia.

Authors:  G M Eisen; J A Dominitz; D O Faigel; J A Goldstein; A N Kalloo; B T Petersen; H M Raddawi; M E Ryan; J J Vargo; H S Young; R D Fanelli; N H Hyman; J Wheeler-Harbaugh
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 9.427

4.  Upper gastrointestinal cancer in a population-based screening program with fecal occult blood test for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  M Rasmussen; O Kronborg
Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 2.423

5.  Bidirectional endoscopy in patients with fecal occult blood.

Authors:  J P Velez; W H Schwesinger; J Stauffer; H V Gaskill; G B Kazantsev; K R Sirinek; W E Strodel
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-10-05       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Gender differences in colorectal polyps and tumors.

Authors:  T M McCashland; R Brand; E Lyden; P de Garmo
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 10.864

7.  Iron deficiency anemia in the elderly: prevalence and endoscopic evaluation of the gastrointestinal tract in outpatients.

Authors:  Erkan Coban; Ayşen Timuragaoglu; Mehmet Meriç
Journal:  Acta Haematol       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.195

8.  Audit of investigations in patients with iron deficiency anaemia.

Authors:  W Luman; K L Ng
Journal:  Singapore Med J       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 1.858

9.  Yield of dual endoscopy for positive fecal occult blood test.

Authors:  M Ali; M Yaqub; Z Haider; I Anees; S Bhargava; J Gian
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 10.864

10.  Relative frequency of upper gastrointestinal and colonic lesions in patients with positive fecal occult-blood tests.

Authors:  D C Rockey; J Koch; J P Cello; L L Sanders; K McQuaid
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1998-07-16       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  15 in total

1.  Performance of the immunochemical fecal occult blood test in predicting lesions in the lower gastrointestinal tract.

Authors:  Tsung-Hsien Chiang; Yi-Chia Lee; Chia-Hung Tu; Han-Mo Chiu; Ming-Shiang Wu
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2011-08-02       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Bowel preparation: is endoscopic administration worth the extra risk?

Authors:  Yu-Hsi Hsieh; Malcolm Koo
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2014-12-02       Impact factor: 3.199

3.  Prevalence of gastric cancer versus colorectal cancer in Asians with a positive fecal occult blood test.

Authors:  Lukejohn W Day; John P Cello; Ma Somsouk; John M Inadomi
Journal:  Indian J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-09-23

4.  Epidemiology and practice patterns of achalasia in a large multi-centre database.

Authors:  B K Enestvedt; J L Williams; A Sonnenberg
Journal:  Aliment Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2011-04-11       Impact factor: 8.171

5.  Same-Day vs Different-Day Elective Upper and Lower Endoscopic Procedures by Setting.

Authors:  Peiqi Wang; Susan M Hutfless; Eun J Shin; Christian Hartman; Sarah Disney; Christopher C Fain; Kathy P Bull-Henry; Daniel K Daniels; Tsion Abdi; Vikesh K Singh; Anthony N Kalloo; Martin A Makary
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 21.873

6.  Esophagoduodenoscopy or colonoscopy: which should be done first?

Authors:  Pınar Sayın; Özgür Bostancı; Hacer Şebnem Türk; Canan Tülay Işıl; Sibel Oba; Mehmet Mihmanlı
Journal:  Turk J Surg       Date:  2020-06-08

7.  Which should go first during same-day upper and lower gastrointestinal endoscopy? A randomized prospective study focusing on colonoscopy performance.

Authors:  Ja Sung Choi; Young Hoon Youn; Sang Kil Lee; Jin Yi Choi; Hee Man Kim; Yu Jin Kim; Ki Jun Han; Hyeon Geun Cho; Si Young Song; Jae Hee Cho
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-01-26       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Bundling in medicare patients undergoing bidirectional endoscopy: how often does it happen?

Authors:  Hashem B El-Serag; Fang Xu; Prachi Biyani; Gregory S Cooper
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2013-08-01       Impact factor: 11.382

9.  Prior esophagogastroduodenoscopy does not affect the cecal intubation time at bidirectional endoscopies.

Authors:  Osman Zekai Oner; Rojbin Karakoyun Demirci; Umut Rıza Gündüz; Arif Aslaner; Umit Koç; Nurullah Bülbüller
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2013-08-01

10.  Paired comparison of procedural sequence in same-day bidirectional endoscopy with moderate sedation and carbon dioxide insufflation: A prospective observational study.

Authors:  Jui-Hsiang Tang; Chi-Liang Cheng; Yen-Lin Kuo; Yi-Ning Tsui
Journal:  Saudi J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.485

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.