Literature DB >> 18724721

Habitat type determines herbivory controls over CO2 fluxes in a warmer Arctic.

Sofie Sjögersten1, René van der Wal, Sarah J Woodin.   

Abstract

High-latitude ecosystems store large amounts of carbon (C); however, the C storage of these ecosystems is under threat from both climate warming and increased levels of herbivory. In this study we examined the combined role of herbivores and climate warming as drivers of CO2 fluxes in two typical high-latitude habitats (mesic heath and wet meadow). We hypothesized that both herbivory and climate warming would reduce the C sink strength of Arctic tundra through their combined effects on plant biomass and gross ecosystem photosynthesis and on decomposition rates and the abiotic environment. To test this hypothesis we employed experimental warming (via International Tundra Experiment [ITEX] chambers) and grazing (via captive Barnacle Geese) in a three-year factorial field experiment. Ecosystem CO2 fluxes (net ecosystem exchange of CO2, ecosystem respiration, and gross ecosystem photosynthesis) were measured in all treatments at varying intensity over the three growing seasons to capture the impact of the treatments on a range of temporal scales (diurnal, seasonal, and interannual). Grazing and warming treatments had markedly different effects on CO2 fluxes in the two tundra habitats. Grazing caused a strong reduction in CO2 assimilation in the wet meadow, while warming reduced CO2 efflux from the mesic heath. Treatment effects on net ecosystem exchange largely derived from the modification of gross ecosystem photosynthesis rather than ecosystem respiration. In this study we have demonstrated that on the habitat scale, grazing by geese is a strong driver of net ecosystem exchange of CO2, with the potential to reduce the CO2 sink strength of Arctic ecosystems. Our results highlight that the large reduction in plant biomass due to goose grazing in the Arctic noted in several studies can alter the C balance of wet tundra ecosystems. We conclude that herbivory will modulate direct climate warming responses of Arctic tundra with implications for the ecosystem C balance; however, the magnitude and direction of the response will be habitat-specific.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18724721     DOI: 10.1890/07-1601.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecology        ISSN: 0012-9658            Impact factor:   5.499


  8 in total

1.  Herbivory changes soil microbial communities and greenhouse gas fluxes in a high-latitude wetland.

Authors:  Karen M Foley; Karen H Beard; Trisha B Atwood; Bonnie G Waring
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2021-03-22       Impact factor: 4.552

2.  Methanotroph populations and CH4 oxidation potentials in high-Arctic peat are altered by herbivory induced vegetation change.

Authors:  Edda M Rainer; Christophe V W Seppey; Alexander T Tveit; Mette M Svenning
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Ecol       Date:  2020-10-10       Impact factor: 4.194

3.  Recovery of ecosystem carbon fluxes and storage from herbivory.

Authors:  Sofie Sjögersten; René van der Wal; Maarten J J E Loonen; Sarah J Woodin
Journal:  Biogeochemistry       Date:  2011-01-07       Impact factor: 4.825

4.  Insect herbivory dampens Subarctic birch forest C sink response to warming.

Authors:  Tarja Silfver; Lauri Heiskanen; Mika Aurela; Kristiina Myller; Kristiina Karhu; Nele Meyer; Juha-Pekka Tuovinen; Elina Oksanen; Matti Rousi; Juha Mikola
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2020-05-21       Impact factor: 14.919

5.  Model responses to CO2 and warming are underestimated without explicit representation of Arctic small-mammal grazing.

Authors:  Edward B Rastetter; Kevin L Griffin; Rebecca J Rowe; Laura Gough; Jennie R McLaren; Natalie T Boelman
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2021-12-08       Impact factor: 6.105

6.  Grazing and topography control nutrient pools in low Arctic soils of Southwest Greenland.

Authors:  Maud A J van Soest; N John Anderson; Roland Bol; Liz R Dixon; Philip M Haygarth
Journal:  Eur J Soil Sci       Date:  2022-07-24       Impact factor: 4.178

7.  Differential arthropod responses to warming are altering the structure of Arctic communities.

Authors:  Amanda M Koltz; Niels M Schmidt; Toke T Høye
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2018-04-18       Impact factor: 2.963

8.  Experimental herbivore exclusion, shrub introduction, and carbon sequestration in alpine plant communities.

Authors:  Mia Vedel Sørensen; Bente Jessen Graae; Dagmar Hagen; Brian J Enquist; Kristin Odden Nystuen; Richard Strimbeck
Journal:  BMC Ecol       Date:  2018-08-30       Impact factor: 2.964

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.