Literature DB >> 18724127

Medial sural artery perforator flap for intraoral reconstruction following cancer ablation.

Shao-Liang Chen1, Chien-Chih Yu, Meing-Chung Chang, Shou-Cheng Deng, Yueng-Shiang Wu, Tim-Mo Chen.   

Abstract

In oral cavity reconstruction, the fasciocutaneous flaps of the distal extremities have always been preferred to any other kind of flap because of their thinness and pliability, which makes them adaptable to different areas in the oral cavity. The radial forearm flap is frequently considered the first choice for intraoral reconstruction, but the disadvantages of donor site morbidity include sacrificing a major artery to the hand and leaving a conspicuous donor site scar. The search for another primarily thinned skin flap as an alternative has led to the application of the medial sural artery perforator flap, which is harvested from the medial aspect of the upper calf. Between June 2003 and March 2007, 22 free medial sural artery perforator flaps were transferred for intraoral defects after cancer ablation, including tongue and floor of mouth (15 cases), buccal mucosa (5 cases), retromolar trigone (1 case), and anterior floor of mouth (1 case). We paid attention to the major perforator (vein > or =1 mm), which was confirmed by the endoscope, as the vascular relay for the skin flap. The size of the skin paddle varied from 7.5 x 4 cm to 17 x 8 cm. The main advantage of this flap is that it provides thin and pliable coverage to achieve better accuracy in the oral cavity. Other advantages of minimizing donor site morbidity include maintaining the function of the medial gastrocnemius muscle, avoiding the need to sacrifice major arteries of the leg, and possible primary closure of the donor defect.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18724127     DOI: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e318157a1a0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Plast Surg        ISSN: 0148-7043            Impact factor:   1.539


  6 in total

1.  The Medial Sural Artery Perforator Flap: A Historical Trek from Ignominious to "Workhorse".

Authors:  Geoffrey G Hallock
Journal:  Arch Plast Surg       Date:  2022-04-06

2.  Pedicled medial sural perforator flap for the reconstruction of knee defects.

Authors:  I-Han Chiang; Chia-Chun Wu; Shyi-Gen Chen; Chih-Hsin Wang
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2016-10-03       Impact factor: 3.315

3.  Reduction of donor site morbidity of free radial forearm flaps: what level of evidence is available?

Authors:  Denys J Loeffelbein; Sammy Al-Benna; Lars Steinsträßer; Robin M Satanovskij; Nils H Rohleder; Thomas Mücke; Klaus-Dietrich Wolff; Marco R Kesting
Journal:  Eplasty       Date:  2012-02-03

4.  Avoiding Facial Incisions with Midface Free Tissue Transfer.

Authors:  Mark W Stalder; Michael Sosin; Leo J Urbinelli; James L Mayo; Amir H Dorafshar; Hugo St Hilaire; Daniel E Borsuk; Eduardo D Rodriguez
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2017-02-22

Review 5.  Do medial sural artery perforator flaps have better clinical outcomes compared to the rectus abdominis perforator (DIEAP) flap in reconstruction of glossectomy defects? A Prisma guided meta-analysis.

Authors:  Rathindra Nath Bera; Preeti Tiwari
Journal:  Ann Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2021-07-24

6.  Medial sural artery perforator flap: a challenging free flap.

Authors:  Navid Mohamadpour Toyserkani; Jens Ahm Sørensen
Journal:  Eur J Plast Surg       Date:  2015-05-24
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.