Literature DB >> 18723927

Linac mechanic QA using a cylindrical phantom.

Maria Mamalui-Hunter1, Harold Li, Daniel A Low.   

Abstract

Precise mechanical operation of a linear accelerator (linac) is critical for accurate radiation therapy dose delivery. Quantitative procedures for linac mechanical quality assurance (QA) used in the standard of care are time consuming and therefore conducted on a relatively infrequent basis. We present a method for evaluating the mechanical performance of a linac based on a series of projection portal images of a prototype cylindrical phantom with embedded radiopaque fiducial markers. The marker autodetection process included modeling imager response to the radiation beam where the projected cylinder attenuation yielded a non-uniform image background. The linac mechanical characteristics were estimated based on nonlinear multi-objective optimization of the projected marker locations. The estimated geometry parameters for the tested commercial model were gantry angle deviation 0.075 +/- 0.076 degrees (1 SD), gantry sag 0.026 +/- 0.02 degrees , source-to-axis distance SAD 998.3 +/- 1.7 mm, source-to-detector distance SDD 1493 +/- 5.0 mm, couch vertical motion 0.6 +/- 0.45 mm, couch rotation 0.154 +/- 0.1 degrees and average linac rotation center (1.02, -0.27, -0.37) +/- (0.36,0.333,1.20) mm relative to the laser intersection. The imager shift was [-0.44, 2.6] +/- [0.20, 1.1] mm and the imager orientation was in-plane rotation 0.05 +/- 0.03 degrees , roll -0.14 +/- 0.09 degrees and pitch -0.9 +/- 0.604 degrees . The performance of this procedure concerning marker detection and optimization was examined by comparing the detected set of marker coordinates to its back-calculated counterpart for three subgroups of markers: central, wall and intermediate relative to the center of the phantom. The maximum difference was less than 0.25 mm with a mean of 0.146 mm and a standard deviation of 0.07 mm. The clinical use of this automated procedure will allow more efficient, more thorough, and more frequent mechanical linac QA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18723927     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/53/18/019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  6 in total

1.  Gantry angle determination during arc IMRT: evaluation of a simple EPID-based technique and two commercial inclinometers.

Authors:  Pejman Rowshanfarzad; Mahsheed Sabet; Daryl J O'Connor; Peter M McCowan; Boyd M C McCurdy; Peter B Greer
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2012-11-08       Impact factor: 2.102

Review 2.  Isocenter verification for linac-based stereotactic radiation therapy: review of principles and techniques.

Authors:  Pejman Rowshanfarzad; Mahsheed Sabet; Daryl J O'Connor; Peter B Greer
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2011-11-15       Impact factor: 2.102

3.  Efficient quality assurance method with automated data acquisition of a single phantom setup to determine radiation and imaging isocenter congruence.

Authors:  Hyejoo Kang; Rakesh Patel; John C Roeske
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2019-09-19       Impact factor: 2.102

4.  Investigation of the mechanical performance of Siemens linacs components during arc: gantry, MLC, and electronic portal imaging device.

Authors:  Pejman Rowshanfarzad; Peter Häring; Hans L Riis; Sune J Zimmermann; Martin A Ebert
Journal:  Med Devices (Auckl)       Date:  2015-11-05

Review 5.  The impact of technology on the changing practice of lung SBRT.

Authors:  Marianne Camille Aznar; Samantha Warren; Mischa Hoogeman; Mirjana Josipovic
Journal:  Phys Med       Date:  2018-01-10       Impact factor: 2.685

6.  A simulation-based method for evaluating geometric tests of a linac c-arm in quality control in radiotherapy.

Authors:  Mateusz Baran; Krzysztof Rzecki; Damian Kabat; Monika Tulik; Anna Wydra; Zuzanna Derda; Agata Sochaczewska; Zbisław Tabor
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2019-09-14       Impact factor: 2.102

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.