Literature DB >> 18723307

Patient-provider communication and cancer screening among unmarried women.

Mary C Politi1, Melissa A Clark, Michelle L Rogers, Kelly McGarry, Chris N Sciamanna.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Unmarried women are less likely than married women to receive recommended cancer screenings. Patient-provider communication is a consistent predictor of cancer screening among women. The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between patient and provider communication, barriers to cancer screening, and on-schedule breast and cervical cancer screening (BCCS) among unmarried women.
METHODS: Data were from the Cancer Screening Project for Women, a 2003-2005 survey examining cancer screening practices. We computed polytomous logistic regression models to examine the relationship between communication (communication about tests, communication about sexual and intimate relationships), barriers to screening, and on-schedule BCCS among unmarried women.
RESULTS: A total of 630 women were enrolled, and 605 women completed the baseline questionnaire. Overall, more than 60% reported on-schedule BCCS. More than half reported that their providers communicated about BCCS most or all of the time. Fewer than half communicated about sexual history and intimate relationships. Women who reported that their providers communicated about screening tests and their sexual and intimate relationships were more likely to be on-schedule for BCCS.
CONCLUSION: Patient-provider communication about multiple topics may encourage women to remain on-schedule for their recommended cancer screenings. Longitudinal research should be conducted to examine whether communication predicts BCCS, and to examine how patient and provider characteristics may influence communication in order to promote adherence to screening guidelines for unmarried women. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Comprehensive communication that goes beyond information about screening tests may impact adherence to cancer screening guidelines.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18723307      PMCID: PMC2648309          DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2008.07.030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Patient Educ Couns        ISSN: 0738-3991


  33 in total

1.  Pathways to access: health insurance, the health care delivery system, and racial/ethnic disparities, 1996-1999.

Authors:  Samuel H Zuvekas; Gregg S Taliaferro
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2003 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.301

2.  Physician gender effects in medical communication: a meta-analytic review.

Authors:  Debra L Roter; Judith A Hall; Yutaka Aoki
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2002-08-14       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 3.  Reflections on the socio-economic correlates of health.

Authors:  Victor R Fuchs
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 3.883

4.  Why do patients of female physicians have higher rates of breast and cervical cancer screening?

Authors:  N Lurie; K L Margolis; P G McGovern; P J Mink; J S Slater
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  Perceptions of cervical cancer and Pap smear screening behavior by women's sexual orientation.

Authors:  J H Price; A N Easton; S K Telljohann; P B Wallace
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  1996-04

6.  Sexual behavior of older women: results of a random-digit-dialing survey of 2,000 women in the United States.

Authors:  Divya Patel; Brenda Gillespie; Betsy Foxman
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 2.830

7.  Cervical cancer risk and Papanicolaou screening in a sample of lesbian and bisexual women.

Authors:  E J Rankow; I Tessaro
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 0.493

Review 8.  Defining the future of primary care: what can we learn from patients?.

Authors:  Dana Gelb Safran
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2003-02-04       Impact factor: 25.391

9.  Predictors of cervical Pap smear screening awareness, intention, and receipt among Vietnamese-American women.

Authors:  Tung T Nguyen; Stephen J McPhee; Thoa Nguyen; Tram Lam; Jeremiah Mock
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 5.043

10.  How important is sex in later life? The views of older people.

Authors:  Merryn Gott; Sharron Hinchliff
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 4.634

View more
  11 in total

1.  Health sources of cancer screening knowledge for Vietnamese women.

Authors:  Anh B Nguyen; Faye Z Belgrave
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 2.037

2.  Examining barriers to cervical cancer screening and treatment in Florida through a socio-ecological lens.

Authors:  Ellen Daley; Amina Alio; Erica H Anstey; Rasheeta Chandler; Karen Dyer; Hannah Helmy
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2011-02

3.  Correlates of Cervical Cancer Screening Among Adult Latino Women: A 5-Year Follow-Up.

Authors:  Patria Rojas; Tan Li; Gira J Ravelo; Christyl Dawson; Mariana Sanchez; Alicia Sneij; Weize Wang; Mariano Kanamori; Elena Cyrus; Mario R De La Rosa
Journal:  World Med Health Policy       Date:  2017-06-12

4.  Patient-provider communication about sexual health among unmarried middle-aged and older women.

Authors:  Mary C Politi; Melissa A Clark; Gene Armstrong; Kelly A McGarry; Christopher N Sciamanna
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2009-02-14       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 5.  Impact of provider-patient communication on cancer screening adherence: A systematic review.

Authors:  Emily B Peterson; Jamie S Ostroff; Katherine N DuHamel; Thomas A D'Agostino; Marisol Hernandez; Mollie R Canzona; Carma L Bylund
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2016-09-28       Impact factor: 4.018

6.  Facilitators and barriers to cervical cancer screening, diagnosis, and enrollment in Medicaid: experiences of Georgia's Women's Health Medicaid Program enrollees.

Authors:  Sarah C Blake; Karen Andes; Laura Hilb; Karie Gaska; Linien Chien; Lisa Flowers; E Kathleen Adams
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 2.037

7.  Patient-clinician information engagement improves adherence to colorectal cancer surveillance after curative treatment: results from a longitudinal study.

Authors:  Andy S L Tan; Mihaela Moldovan-Johnson; Sarah Parvanta; Stacy W Gray; Katrina Armstrong; Robert C Hornik
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2012-08-02

Review 8.  Cervical cancer screening and psychosocial barriers perceived by patients. A systematic review.

Authors:  Alicja Bukowska-Durawa; Aleksandra Luszczynska
Journal:  Contemp Oncol (Pozn)       Date:  2014-06-18

9.  Revisiting the Effects of Organized Mammography Programs on Inequalities in Breast Screening Uptake: A Multilevel Analysis of Nationwide Data From 1997 to 2017.

Authors:  Vladimir Jolidon; Vincent De Prez; Piet Bracke; Andrew Bell; Claudine Burton-Jeangros; Stéphane Cullati
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-02-07

10.  Decision making about Pap test use among Korean immigrant women: A qualitative study.

Authors:  Kyounghae Kim; Soohyun Kim; Joseph J Gallo; Marie T Nolan; Hae-Ra Han
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2016-09-30       Impact factor: 3.377

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.