Literature DB >> 18723028

Determining the most important cellular characteristics for fracture healing using design of experiments methods.

Hanna Isaksson1, Corrinus C van Donkelaar, Rik Huiskes, Jiang Yao, Keita Ito.   

Abstract

Computational models are employed as tools to investigate possible mechanoregulation pathways for tissue differentiation and bone healing. However, current models do not account for the uncertainty in input parameters, and often include assumptions about parameter values that are not yet established. The objective of this study was to determine the most important cellular characteristics of a mechanoregulatory model describing both cell phenotype-specific and mechanobiological processes that are active during bone healing using a statistical approach. The computational model included an adaptive two-dimensional finite element model of a fractured long bone. Three different outcome criteria were quantified: (1) ability to predict sequential healing events, (2) amount of bone formation at early, mid and late stages of healing and (3) the total time until complete healing. For the statistical analysis, first a resolution IV fractional factorial design (L(64)) was used to identify the most significant factors. Thereafter, a three-level Taguchi orthogonal array (L(27)) was employed to study the curvature (non-linearity) of the 10 identified most important parameters. The results show that the ability of the model to predict the sequences of normal fracture healing was predominantly influenced by the rate of matrix production of bone, followed by cartilage degradation (replacement). The amount of bone formation at early stages was solely dependent on matrix production of bone and the proliferation rate of osteoblasts. However, the amount of bone formation at mid and late phases had the rate of matrix production of cartilage as the most influential parameter. The time to complete healing was primarily dependent on the rate of cartilage degradation during endochondral ossification, followed by the rate of cartilage formation. The analyses of the curvature revealed a linear response for parameters related to bone, where higher rates of formation were more beneficial to healing. In contrast, parameters related to fibrous tissue and cartilage showed optimum levels. Some fibrous connective tissue- and cartilage formation was beneficial to bone healing, but too much of either tissue delayed bone formation. The identified significant parameters and processes are further confirmed by in vivo animal experiments in the literature. This study illustrates the potential of design of experiments methods for evaluating computational mechanobiological model parameters and suggests that further experiments should preferably focus at establishing values of parameters related to cartilage formation and degradation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18723028     DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2008.07.037

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Theor Biol        ISSN: 0022-5193            Impact factor:   2.691


  12 in total

1.  Mechanobiological simulations of peri-acetabular bone ingrowth: a comparative analysis of cell-phenotype specific and phenomenological algorithms.

Authors:  Kaushik Mukherjee; Sanjay Gupta
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2016-06-02       Impact factor: 2.602

Review 2.  A review of computational models of bone fracture healing.

Authors:  Monan Wang; Ning Yang; Xinyu Wang
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2017-08-08       Impact factor: 2.602

Review 3.  A review of the combination of experimental measurements and fibril-reinforced modeling for investigation of articular cartilage and chondrocyte response to loading.

Authors:  Petro Julkunen; Wouter Wilson; Hanna Isaksson; Jukka S Jurvelin; Walter Herzog; Rami K Korhonen
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2013-04-08       Impact factor: 2.238

4.  In silico Mechano-Chemical Model of Bone Healing for the Regeneration of Critical Defects: The Effect of BMP-2.

Authors:  Frederico O Ribeiro; María José Gómez-Benito; João Folgado; Paulo R Fernandes; José Manuel García-Aznar
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-04       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  Mechanical regulation of bone regeneration: theories, models, and experiments.

Authors:  Duncan Colin Betts; Ralph Müller
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2014-12-10       Impact factor: 5.555

Review 6.  In silico bone mechanobiology: modeling a multifaceted biological system.

Authors:  Mario Giorgi; Stefaan W Verbruggen; Damien Lacroix
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Syst Biol Med       Date:  2016-09-07

7.  Potency Biomarker Signature Genes from Multiparametric Osteogenesis Assays: Will cGMP Human Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stromal Cells Make Bone?

Authors:  Alba Murgia; Elena Veronesi; Olivia Candini; Anna Caselli; Naomi D'souza; Valeria Rasini; Andrea Giorgini; Fabio Catani; Lorenzo Iughetti; Massimo Dominici; Jorge S Burns
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-10-06       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Capturing the wide variety of impaired fracture healing phenotypes in Neurofibromatosis Type 1 with eight key factors: a computational study.

Authors:  A Carlier; H Brems; J M A Ashbourn; I Nica; E Legius; L Geris
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-01-29       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Using Design of Experiments Methods for Assessing Peak Contact Pressure to Material Properties of Soft Tissue in Human Knee.

Authors:  Marjan Bahraminasab; Ali Jahan; Barkawi Sahari; Manohar Arumugam; Mahmoud Shamsborhan; Mohd Roshdi Hassan
Journal:  J Med Eng       Date:  2013-09-08

10.  In silico clinical trials for pediatric orphan diseases.

Authors:  A Carlier; A Vasilevich; M Marechal; J de Boer; L Geris
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-02-06       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.