Literature DB >> 18722700

The female advantage in object location memory is robust to verbalizability and mode of presentation of test stimuli.

Lisa Lejbak1, Mirna Vrbancic, Margaret Crossley.   

Abstract

This study extends Duff and Hampson's [Duff, S., & Hampson, E. (2001). A sex difference on a novel spatial working memory task in humans. Brain and Cognition,47, 470-493] finding of a sex-related difference in favor of females for an object location memory task. Twenty female and 20 male undergraduate students performed both manual and computer-generated versions of the task using stimuli that varied in degree of verbalizability. A 2x2x3 ANOVA with Sex as a between-subjects factor, and Presentation (manual or computer) and Stimuli (common objects, common shapes, and novel shapes) as within-subjects repeated measures revealed a significant main effect for Sex. Females made fewer errors than males regardless of presentation and across the three levels of verbalizability (i.e., stimulus types); moreover, the effect size was considered "large" [Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Berlin: Springer]. These findings are interpreted within the context of the current literature that demonstrates a female advantage for object location memory (e.g., [Voyer, D., Postma, A., Brake, B., & Imperato-McGinley, J. (2007). Gender differences in object location memory: A meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 14, 23-38]).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18722700     DOI: 10.1016/j.bandc.2008.06.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Cogn        ISSN: 0278-2626            Impact factor:   2.310


  10 in total

1.  Altered source memory retrieval is associated with pathological doubt in obsessive-compulsive disorder.

Authors:  Christy A Olson; Lisa R Hale; Nancy Hamilton; Joshua N Powell; Laura E Martin; Cary R Savage
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2015-08-24       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Sex differences in spatial accuracy relate to the neural activation of antagonistic muscles in young adults.

Authors:  Agostina Casamento-Moran; Sandra K Hunter; Yen-Ting Chen; Min Hyuk Kwon; Emily J Fox; Basma Yacoubi; Evangelos A Christou
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-05-12       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Sex differences in visual-spatial working memory: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Daniel Voyer; Susan D Voyer; Jean Saint-Aubin
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-04

4.  The Role of the Y Chromosome in Brain Function.

Authors:  Eleni Kopsida; Evangelia Stergiakouli; Phoebe M Lynn; Lawrence S Wilkinson; William Davies
Journal:  Open Neuroendocrinol J       Date:  2009

Review 5.  Why estrogens matter for behavior and brain health.

Authors:  Liisa A M Galea; Karyn M Frick; Elizabeth Hampson; Farida Sohrabji; Elena Choleris
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 8.989

Review 6.  Let's call the whole thing off: evaluating gender and sex differences in executive function.

Authors:  Nicola M Grissom; Teresa M Reyes
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2018-08-14       Impact factor: 7.853

7.  Men and women exhibit a differential bias for processing movement versus objects.

Authors:  Robert F McGivern; Brian Adams; Robert J Handa; Jaime A Pineda
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  The processing of object identity information by women and men.

Authors:  Michael Tlauka
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-10       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  The Effect of Mental Fatigue and Gender on Working Memory Performance during Repeated Practice by Young and Older Adults.

Authors:  Valentina Pergher; Nele Vanbilsen; Marc Van Hulle
Journal:  Neural Plast       Date:  2021-10-04       Impact factor: 3.599

Review 10.  Estrogens, Aging, and Working Memory.

Authors:  Elizabeth Hampson
Journal:  Curr Psychiatry Rep       Date:  2018-10-11       Impact factor: 5.285

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.