Literature DB >> 18722500

Electrophysiological and behavioral evidence of gender differences in the modulation of distraction by the emotional context.

Manuel Garcia-Garcia1, Judith Domínguez-Borràs, Iria SanMiguel, Carles Escera.   

Abstract

Gender differences in brain activity while processing emotional stimuli have been demonstrated by neuroimaging and electrophysiological studies. However, the possible differential effects of emotion on attentional mechanisms between women and men are less understood. The present study aims to elucidate any gender differences in the modulation of unexpected auditory stimulus processing using an emotional context elicited by aversive images. Fourteen men and fourteen women performed a well-established auditory-visual distraction paradigm in which distraction was elicited by novel stimuli within a neutral or negative emotional context induced by images from the IAPS. Response time increased after unexpected novel sounds as a behavioral effect of distraction, and this increase was larger for women, but not for men, within the negative emotional context. Novelty-P3 was also modulated by the emotional context for women but not for men. These results reveal stronger novelty processing in women than in men during a threatening situation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18722500     DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2008.07.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Psychol        ISSN: 0301-0511            Impact factor:   3.251


  9 in total

1.  Gender difference in event related potentials to masked emotional stimuli in the oddball task.

Authors:  Eun Young Kim; Seung-Hwan Lee; Gewnhi Park; Sangrae Kim; Imyel Kim; Jeong-Ho Chae; Hyun Taek Kim
Journal:  Psychiatry Investig       Date:  2013-05-30       Impact factor: 2.505

2.  Comparison of alcohol impairment of behavioral and attentional inhibition.

Authors:  Jessica Weafer; Mark T Fillmore
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2012-06-04       Impact factor: 4.492

3.  The modulation of auditory novelty processing by working memory load in school age children and adults: a combined behavioral and event-related potential study.

Authors:  Philipp Ruhnau; Nicole Wetzel; Andreas Widmann; Erich Schröger
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2010-10-07       Impact factor: 3.288

4.  The influence of observers' sex on attention-demanding performance depends on performers' sex.

Authors:  Lijun Wang; Jinfeng Tan; Jiangtao Chen; Antao Chen
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-08-31

5.  Sex Differences in Gamma Band Functional Connectivity Between the Frontal Lobe and Cortical Areas During an Auditory Oddball Task, as Revealed by Imaginary Coherence Assessment.

Authors:  Toshiro Fujimoto; Eiichi Okumura; Atsushi Kodabashi; Kouzou Takeuchi; Toshiaki Otsubo; Katsumi Nakamura; Kazutaka Yatsushiro; Masaki Sekine; Shinichiro Kamiya; Susumu Shimooki; Toshiyo Tamura
Journal:  Open Neuroimag J       Date:  2016-08-31

6.  Fear Spreading Across Senses: Visual Emotional Events Alter Cortical Responses to Touch, Audition, and Vision.

Authors:  Judith Domínguez-Borràs; Sebastian Walter Rieger; Corrado Corradi-Dell'Acqua; Rémi Neveu; Patrik Vuilleumier
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2017-01-01       Impact factor: 5.357

7.  Attention capture in birds performing an auditory streaming task.

Authors:  Huaizhen Cai; Micheal L Dent
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-06-26       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Deficient Event-Related Theta Oscillations in Individuals at Risk for Alcoholism: A Study of Reward Processing and Impulsivity Features.

Authors:  Chella Kamarajan; Ashwini K Pandey; David B Chorlian; Niklas Manz; Arthur T Stimus; Andrey P Anokhin; Lance O Bauer; Samuel Kuperman; John Kramer; Kathleen K Bucholz; Marc A Schuckit; Victor M Hesselbrock; Bernice Porjesz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-11-18       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  The impact of spoken action words on performance in a cross-modal oddball task.

Authors:  Gregory Neely; Daniel Eriksson Sörman; Jessica K Ljungberg
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-11-20       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.