BACKGROUND: Renal dysfunction is an important independent prognostic factor in heart failure (HF). Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) improves functional status and left ventricular (LV) function in HF patients with ventricular dyssynchrony, but the impact of CRT on renal function is less defined. We hypothesized that CRT would improve glomerular filtration rate as estimated by the abbreviated Modification of Diet in Renal Disease equation (eGFR). METHODS AND RESULTS: The Multicenter InSync Randomized Clinical Evaluation (MIRACLE) study evaluated CRT in HF patients with NYHA Class III-IV, ejection fraction <or=35%, and QRS >or=130 ms. Patients were evaluated before and 6 months after randomization to control (n = 225) or CRT (n = 228). Patients were categorized according to their baseline eGFR: >or=90 (category A), 60 <or=eGFR <90 (category B), and 30 <or=eGFR <60 (category C) mL/min per 1.73 m(2). CRT improved LV function in all categories. Compared with control, CRT increased eGFR (-2.4 +/- 1.2 vs. +2.7 +/- 1.2 mL/min per 1.73 m(2); P = .003) and reduced blood urea nitrogen (+6.4 +/- 2.4 vs. -1.1 +/- 1.5 mg/mL; P = .008) in category C, whereas no differences were observed in categories A and B. CONCLUSIONS:CRT increased eGFR and reduced blood urea nitrogen in HF patients with moderately reduced baseline eGFR. By improving cardiac function, CRT can indirectly improve renal function, underscoring the importance of cardiorenal interaction and providing another mechanism for the beneficial effects of CRT.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND:Renal dysfunction is an important independent prognostic factor in heart failure (HF). Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) improves functional status and left ventricular (LV) function in HF patients with ventricular dyssynchrony, but the impact of CRT on renal function is less defined. We hypothesized that CRT would improve glomerular filtration rate as estimated by the abbreviated Modification of Diet in Renal Disease equation (eGFR). METHODS AND RESULTS: The Multicenter InSync Randomized Clinical Evaluation (MIRACLE) study evaluated CRT in HF patients with NYHA Class III-IV, ejection fraction <or=35%, and QRS >or=130 ms. Patients were evaluated before and 6 months after randomization to control (n = 225) or CRT (n = 228). Patients were categorized according to their baseline eGFR: >or=90 (category A), 60 <or=eGFR <90 (category B), and 30 <or=eGFR <60 (category C) mL/min per 1.73 m(2). CRT improved LV function in all categories. Compared with control, CRT increased eGFR (-2.4 +/- 1.2 vs. +2.7 +/- 1.2 mL/min per 1.73 m(2); P = .003) and reduced blood ureanitrogen (+6.4 +/- 2.4 vs. -1.1 +/- 1.5 mg/mL; P = .008) in category C, whereas no differences were observed in categories A and B. CONCLUSIONS: CRT increased eGFR and reduced blood ureanitrogen in HF patients with moderately reduced baseline eGFR. By improving cardiac function, CRT can indirectly improve renal function, underscoring the importance of cardiorenal interaction and providing another mechanism for the beneficial effects of CRT.
Authors: Martin G St John Sutton; Ted Plappert; William T Abraham; Andrew L Smith; David B DeLurgio; Angel R Leon; Evan Loh; Dusan Z Kocovic; Westby G Fisher; Myrvin Ellestad; John Messenger; Kristin Kruger; Kathryn E Hilpisch; Michael R S Hill Journal: Circulation Date: 2003-03-31 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: William T Abraham; Westby G Fisher; Andrew L Smith; David B Delurgio; Angel R Leon; Evan Loh; Dusan Z Kocovic; Milton Packer; Alfredo L Clavell; David L Hayes; Myrvin Ellestad; Robin J Trupp; Jackie Underwood; Faith Pickering; Cindy Truex; Peggy McAtee; John Messenger Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2002-06-13 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Philip B Adamson; Karen J Kleckner; Warren L VanHout; Sriram Srinivasan; William T Abraham Journal: Circulation Date: 2003-07-14 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Michael R Bristow; Leslie A Saxon; John Boehmer; Steven Krueger; David A Kass; Teresa De Marco; Peter Carson; Lorenzo DiCarlo; David DeMets; Bill G White; Dale W DeVries; Arthur M Feldman Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2004-05-20 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: James B Young; William T Abraham; Andrew L Smith; Angel R Leon; Randy Lieberman; Bruce Wilkoff; Robert C Canby; John S Schroeder; L Bing Liem; Shelley Hall; Kevin Wheelan Journal: JAMA Date: 2003-05-28 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Niall G Mahon; Eugene H Blackstone; Gary S Francis; Randall C Starling; James B Young; Michael S Lauer Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2002-09-18 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Paul Knaapen; Linda M C van Campen; Carel C de Cock; Marco J W Götte; Cees A Visser; Adriaan A Lammertsma; Frans C Visser Journal: Circulation Date: 2004-08-10 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Tom D J Smilde; Hans L Hillege; Gerjan Navis; Frans Boomsma; Dick de Zeeuw; Dirk J van Veldhuisen Journal: Am Heart J Date: 2004-07 Impact factor: 4.749
Authors: Ulas Höke; Mand J H Khidir; Enno T van der Velde; Martin J Schalij; Jeroen J Bax; Victoria Delgado; Nina Ajmone Marsan Journal: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2015-09-25 Impact factor: 8.237
Authors: Mohammed Shurrab; Dennis T Ko; Yazan Zayed; Sankar D Navaneethan; Nour Yadak; Abeer Yaseen; Anna Kaoutskaia; Waad Qamhia; Zakaria Hamdan; Saleem Haj-Yahia; Douglas S Lee; David Newman; Jeff S Healey; Paula Harvey; Eugene Crystal Journal: J Interv Card Electrophysiol Date: 2018-07-30 Impact factor: 1.900
Authors: Aaron M Hein; Julia J Scialla; Daniel Edmonston; Lauren B Cooper; Adam D DeVore; Robert J Mentz Journal: JACC Heart Fail Date: 2019-05 Impact factor: 12.035