Literature DB >> 18721864

Forced and voluntary exercise differentially affect brain and behavior.

J L Leasure1, M Jones.   

Abstract

The potential of physical exercise to decrease body weight, alleviate depression, combat aging and enhance cognition has been well-supported by research studies. However, exercise regimens vary widely across experiments, raising the question of whether there is an optimal form, intensity and duration of exertion that would produce maximal benefits. In particular, a comparison of forced and voluntary exercise is needed, since the results of several prior studies suggest that they may differentially affect brain and behavior. In the present study, we employed a novel 8-week exercise paradigm that standardized the distance, pattern, equipment and housing condition of forced and voluntary exercisers. Exercising rats were then compared with sedentary controls on measures previously shown to be influenced by physical activity. Our results indicate that although the distance covered by both exercise groups was the same, voluntary exercisers ran at higher speed and for less total time than forced exercisers. When compared with sedentary controls, forced but not voluntary exercise was found to increase anxiety-like behaviors in the open field. Both forms of exercise increased the number of surviving bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU)+ cells in the dentate gyrus after 8 weeks of exercise, although forced exercisers had significantly more than voluntary exercisers. Phenotypic analysis of BrdU+ cells showed no difference between groups in the percentage of newborn cells that became neurons, however, because forced exercise maximally increased the number of BrdU+ cells, it ultimately produced more neurons than voluntary exercise. Our results indicate that forced and voluntary exercise are inherently different: voluntary wheel running is characterized by rapid pace and short duration, whereas forced exercise involves a slower, more consistent pace for longer periods of time. This basic difference between the two forms of exercise is likely responsible for their differential effects on brain and behavior.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18721864     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2008.07.041

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroscience        ISSN: 0306-4522            Impact factor:   3.590


  102 in total

1.  A comparison of low- and high-impact forced exercise: effects of training paradigm on learning and memory.

Authors:  John A Kennard; Diana S Woodruff-Pak
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2012-02-28

Review 2.  Exercise offers anxiolytic potential: a role for stress and brain noradrenergic-galaninergic mechanisms.

Authors:  Natale R Sciolino; Philip V Holmes
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2012-07-05       Impact factor: 8.989

3.  Interaction between intensity and duration of acute exercise on neuronal activity associated with depression-related behavior in rats.

Authors:  Ryoko Morikawa; Natsuko Kubota; Seiichiro Amemiya; Takeshi Nishijima; Ichiro Kita
Journal:  J Physiol Sci       Date:  2021-01-15       Impact factor: 2.781

4.  Functional analysis of neurovascular adaptations to exercise in the dentate gyrus of young adult mice associated with cognitive gain.

Authors:  Peter J Clark; Weronika J Brzezinska; Emily K Puchalski; David A Krone; Justin S Rhodes
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 3.899

5.  The role of exercise in facilitating basal ganglia function in Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Giselle M Petzinger; Beth E Fisher; Garnik Akopian; Daniel P Holschneider; Ruth Wood; John P Walsh; Brett Lund; Charles Meshul; Marta Vuckovic; Michael W Jakowec
Journal:  Neurodegener Dis Manag       Date:  2011-04-01

Review 6.  An endothelial link between the benefits of physical exercise in dementia.

Authors:  Lianne J Trigiani; Edith Hamel
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2017-06-15       Impact factor: 6.200

7.  Voluntary exercise opposes insulin resistance of skeletal muscle glucose transport during liquid fructose ingestion in rats.

Authors:  Yupaporn Rattanavichit; Jariya Buniam; Juthamard Surapongchai; Vitoon Saengsirisuwan
Journal:  J Physiol Biochem       Date:  2018-06-07       Impact factor: 4.158

8.  Exercise neuroprotection in a rat model of binge alcohol consumption.

Authors:  J Leigh Leasure; Kimberly Nixon
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2009-12-17       Impact factor: 3.455

Review 9.  Exercise as a Positive Modulator of Brain Function.

Authors:  Karim A Alkadhi
Journal:  Mol Neurobiol       Date:  2017-05-02       Impact factor: 5.590

Review 10.  Pharmacomimetics of exercise: novel approaches for hippocampally-targeted neuroprotective agents.

Authors:  A M Stranahan; Y Zhou; B Martin; S Maudsley
Journal:  Curr Med Chem       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 4.530

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.