Literature DB >> 18721846

Genotoxic damage in pathology anatomy laboratory workers exposed to formaldehyde.

Solange Costa1, Patrícia Coelho, Carla Costa, Susana Silva, Olga Mayan, Luís Silva Santos, Jorge Gaspar, João Paulo Teixeira.   

Abstract

Formaldehyde (FA) is a chemical traditionally used in pathology and anatomy laboratories as a tissue preservative. Several epidemiological studies of occupational exposure to FA have indicated an increased risk of nasopharyngeal cancers in industrial workers, embalmers and pathology anatomists. There is also a clear evidence of nasal squamous cell carcinomas from inhalation studies in the rat. The postulated mode of action for nasal tumours in rats was considered biologically plausible and considered likely to be relevant to humans. Based on the available data IARC, the International Agency for Research on Cancer, has recently classified FA as a human carcinogen. Although the in vitro genotoxic as well as the in vivo carcinogenic potentials of FA are well documented in mammalian cells and in rodents, evidence for genotoxic effects and carcinogenic properties in humans is insufficient and conflicting thus remains to be more documented. To evaluate the genetic effects of long-term occupational exposure to FA a group of 30 Pathological Anatomy laboratory workers was tested for a variety of biological endpoints, cytogenetic tests (micronuclei, MN; sister chromatid exchange, SCE) and comet assay. The level of exposure to FA was evaluated near the breathing zone of workers, time weighted average of exposure was calculated for each subject. The association between the biomarkers and polymorphic genes of xenobiotic metabolising and DNA repair enzymes was also assessed. The mean level of exposure was 0.44+/-0.08ppm (0.04-1.58ppm). MN frequency was significantly higher (p=0.003) in the exposed subjects (5.47+/-0.76) when compared with controls (3.27+/-0.69). SCE mean value was significantly higher (p<0.05) among the exposed group (6.13+/-0.29) compared with control group (4.49+/-0.16). Comet assay data showed a significant increase (p<0.05) of TL in FA-exposed workers (60.00+/-2.31) with respect to the control group (41.85+/-1.97). A positive correlation was found between FA exposure levels and MN frequency (r=0.384, p=0.001) and TL (r=0.333, p=0.005). Regarding the genetic polymorphisms studied, no significant effect was found on the genotoxic endpoints. The results of the present biomonitoring study emphasize the need to develop safety programs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18721846     DOI: 10.1016/j.tox.2008.07.056

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Toxicology        ISSN: 0300-483X            Impact factor:   4.221


  24 in total

1.  Cancer Survivor Study (CASUS) on colorectal patients: longitudinal study on physical activity, fitness, nutrition, and its influences on quality of life, disease recurrence, and survival. Rationale and design.

Authors:  Luisa Soares-Miranda; Sandra Abreu; Marco Silva; Armando Peixoto; Rosa Ramalho; Pedro Correia da Silva; Carla Costa; João Paulo Teixeira; Carla Gonçalves; Pedro Moreira; Jorge Mota; Guilherme Macedo
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2016-10-11       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 2.  Epigenetic alterations induced by genotoxic occupational and environmental human chemical carcinogens: A systematic literature review.

Authors:  Grace Chappell; Igor P Pogribny; Kathryn Z Guyton; Ivan Rusyn
Journal:  Mutat Res Rev Mutat Res       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 5.657

3.  Malondialdehyde-deoxyguanosine adduct formation in workers of pathology wards: the role of air formaldehyde exposure.

Authors:  Roberto Bono; Valeria Romanazzi; Armelle Munnia; Sara Piro; Alessandra Allione; Fulvio Ricceri; Simonetta Guarrera; Cristina Pignata; Giuseppe Matullo; Poguang Wang; Roger W Giese; Marco Peluso
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2010-08-16       Impact factor: 3.739

4.  Occupational exposure to formaldehyde in an institute of morphology in Brazil: a comparison of area and personal sampling.

Authors:  Soraya de M Ochs; Lucas de O Grotz; Luciara S Factorine; Mauro R Rodrigues; Annibal D Pereira Netto
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2012-02-10       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 5.  Cancer effects of formaldehyde: a proposal for an indoor air guideline value.

Authors:  Gunnar Damgård Nielsen; Peder Wolkoff
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2010-05-14       Impact factor: 5.153

6.  Infusion fluids contain harmful glucose degradation products.

Authors:  Anna Bryland; Marcus Broman; Martin Erixon; Bengt Klarin; Torbjörn Lindén; Hans Friberg; Anders Wieslander; Per Kjellstrand; Claudio Ronco; Ola Carlsson; Gabriela Godaly
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2010-04-16       Impact factor: 17.440

7.  Is organic farming safer to farmers' health? A comparison between organic and traditional farming.

Authors:  Carla Costa; Julia García-Lestón; Solange Costa; Patrícia Coelho; Susana Silva; Marta Pingarilho; Vanessa Valdiglesias; Francesca Mattei; Valentina Dall'Armi; Stefano Bonassi; Blanca Laffon; John Snawder; João Paulo Teixeira
Journal:  Toxicol Lett       Date:  2014-02-24       Impact factor: 4.372

8.  Bio-monitoring of DNA damage in matchstick industry workers from Peshawar Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan.

Authors:  Muhammad Khisroon; Ajmal Khan; Ubaid Ullah; Farrah Zaidi
Journal:  Int J Occup Environ Health       Date:  2018-09-24

9.  Use of the cytokinesis-blocked micronucleus assay to detect gender differences and genetic instability in a lung cancer case-control study.

Authors:  Michelle K McHugh; Mirtha S Lopez; Chung-Han Ho; Margaret R Spitz; Carol J Etzel; Randa A El-Zein
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2012-11-29       Impact factor: 4.254

10.  The role of phase I, phase II, and DNA-repair gene polymorphisms in the damage induced by formaldehyde in pathologists.

Authors:  Federica Ghelli; Enrico Cocchi; Martina Buglisi; Giulia Squillacioti; Valeria Bellisario; Roberto Bono; Alfredo Santovito
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-05-18       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.