Literature DB >> 18721553

The impact of surgical ventricular restoration on mitral valve regurgitation.

Roni B Prucz1, Eric S Weiss, Nishant D Patel, Lois U Nwakanma, Ashish S Shah, John V Conte.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Surgical management of functional mitral regurgitation (MR) in ischemic cardiomyopathy is controversial. Surgical ventricular restoration (SVR) decreases left ventricular volume and may improve MR severity. We assessed the impact of SVR on the degree of MR.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed patients with ejection fractions (EF) < 0.35 who underwent SVR with coronary artery bypass grafting (SVR+CABG) over a 3-year period. Patients with concomitant mitral valve procedures were excluded. Patients with EF < 0.35 who had CABG alone during the same time period served as control. Mitral regurgitation was graded 0 to 4+ by echocardiogram and ventriculogram. Outcomes included survival, MR grade, and cardiac function.
RESULTS: Thirty-nine patients received SVR+CABG: 3% (1 of 39) had 4+, 10% (4 of 39) had 3+, 51% (20 of 39) had 2+, and 36% (14 of 39) had 0 to 1+ MR. Thirty-five patients with a similar MR distribution underwent CABG alone. Operative mortality was 2.6% for SVR+CABG and 5.7% for CABG patients (p = 0.62). At follow-up, MR grade decreased by 57% (2.24 +/- 0.5 to 1.24 +/- 0.9, p < 0.001) for the SVR+CABG group compared to 12% (2.25 +/- 0.5 to 2.00 +/- 0.9, p = 0.27) for the CABG alone group. SVR+CABG patients had significantly less MR than CABG patients at follow-up (1.24 +/- 0.9 vs 2.00 +/- 0.9, p = 0.007), with 15 patients improving to 0 to 1+ MR postoperatively versus 6 patients in the CABG cohort (p = 0.02). Improvement in postoperative EF was significantly greater after SVR+CABG (0.13% vs 7%, p = 0.04). Three-year survival was 85% for SVR+CABG and 72% for CABG patients (p = 0.39).
CONCLUSIONS: SVR+CABG demonstrated greater reduction in MR severity at follow-up than CABG alone. Decreased left ventricular volumes and improved papillary muscle orientation likely contribute to decreased MR after SVR.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18721553     DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2008.04.100

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  5 in total

Review 1.  Surgical approach to mitral regurgitation in chronic heart failure: when is it an option?

Authors:  Juan A Crestanello
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2012-03

2.  Management of mitral regurgitation during left ventricular reconstruction for ischemic heart failure.

Authors:  Patrick Klein; Jerry Braun; Eduard R Holman; Michel I M Versteegh; Harriette F Verwey; Robert A E Dion; Jeroen J Bax; Robert J M Klautz
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 4.191

3.  [Mitral regurgitation in heart failure. Surgical therapy].

Authors:  H Aubin; H Kamiya; A Lichtenberg
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 1.443

4.  Review of surgical ventricular restoration: A procedure to treat cardiac failure.

Authors:  Anupam A Sule; Ajey A Sule; Downey H Fred; Sanjeev S Thakur
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2010-02-05       Impact factor: 0.656

5.  Influence of procedural differences on mitral valve configuration after surgical repair for functional mitral regurgitation: in which direction should the papillary muscle be relocated?

Authors:  Taiju Watanabe; Hirokuni Arai; Eiki Nagaoka; Keiji Oi; Tsuyoshi Hachimaru; Hidehito Kuroki; Tatsuki Fujiwara; Tomohiro Mizuno
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2014-12-10       Impact factor: 1.637

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.