PURPOSE: Until now there has been no standardized, systemic approach to diagnostics in patients with optic nerve head drusen (ONHD). This study compares visual field (VF) results obtained with static automated perimetry (SAP) and semi-automated kinetic perimetry (SKP) in patients with bilateral visible ONHD. METHODS: Visual fields in 26 eyes (13 patients) with ONHD were obtained by Humphrey Field Analyser II (SAP) and Octopus 101 (SKP) equipment and classified by three masked observers. Pairs of VFs were considered equivalent if the descriptions given by both methods matched. Individual reaction time (RT) was assessed during SKP. Fifteen healthy volunteers were examined as control material. RESULTS: Visual field pairs matched in 19 eyes (three normal VFs, 16 arcuate defects). In the remaining eight eyes SKP provided more information in concentric constriction of the VF (two eyes) and SAP provided more information on paracentral scotomas (five eyes). Sensitivity was 69% for SKP, 80% for SAP and 88% for both methods together. Mean RT assessed using SKP amounted to 909 ms in eyes with ONHD and 568 ms in normal subjects (p < 0.0003). The median examination duration was 13 mins with SKP and 11 mins with SAP (p = 0.05) in eyes with ONHD, and 8 mins in control eyes (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: In clinical practice it is necessary to perform both SAP and SKP in patients with ONHD because the VF defects are diverse. In SKP, RT is prolonged in eyes with ONHD compared with normal eyes and SKP takes longer than SAP in ONHD eyes.
PURPOSE: Until now there has been no standardized, systemic approach to diagnostics in patients with optic nerve head drusen (ONHD). This study compares visual field (VF) results obtained with static automated perimetry (SAP) and semi-automated kinetic perimetry (SKP) in patients with bilateral visible ONHD. METHODS: Visual fields in 26 eyes (13 patients) with ONHD were obtained by Humphrey Field Analyser II (SAP) and Octopus 101 (SKP) equipment and classified by three masked observers. Pairs of VFs were considered equivalent if the descriptions given by both methods matched. Individual reaction time (RT) was assessed during SKP. Fifteen healthy volunteers were examined as control material. RESULTS: Visual field pairs matched in 19 eyes (three normal VFs, 16 arcuate defects). In the remaining eight eyes SKP provided more information in concentric constriction of the VF (two eyes) and SAP provided more information on paracentral scotomas (five eyes). Sensitivity was 69% for SKP, 80% for SAP and 88% for both methods together. Mean RT assessed using SKP amounted to 909 ms in eyes with ONHD and 568 ms in normal subjects (p < 0.0003). The median examination duration was 13 mins with SKP and 11 mins with SAP (p = 0.05) in eyes with ONHD, and 8 mins in control eyes (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: In clinical practice it is necessary to perform both SAP and SKP in patients with ONHD because the VF defects are diverse. In SKP, RT is prolonged in eyes with ONHD compared with normal eyes and SKP takes longer than SAP in ONHD eyes.
Authors: Katarzyna Nowomiejska; Marian Jedrych; Agnieszka Brzozowska; Konrad Rejdak; Tomasz Zarnowski; Michael J Koss; Katarzyna Ksiazek; Piotr Ksiazek; Ryszard Maciejewski; Anselm G Juenemann; Ulrich Schiefer; Robert Rejdak Journal: BMC Ophthalmol Date: 2014-04-30 Impact factor: 2.209
Authors: Katarzyna Nowomiejska; Agnieszka Kiszka; Edyta Koman-Wierdak; Katarzyna Tonska; Ryszard Maciejewski; Anselm G Jünemann; Robert Rejdak Journal: J Ophthalmol Date: 2018-03-21 Impact factor: 1.909