Literature DB >> 18720892

The value of routine outcome measurement for consumers of mental health services: master or servant?

Brenda Happell1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Standardized instruments have been introduced for routine use within Victorian mental health services. The aim of routine outcome measurement (ROM) is to ensure the highest standard of service delivery as demonstrated through quality and accountability processes. AIMS: The aim is to determine the extent to which ROM measure against the 12 principles of outcome measurement described by Smith et al. (1997).
METHOD: The three ROM currently used in Victoria were critiqued according to the 12 principles, with the support of a review of the literature regarding outcome measurement.
RESULTS: Of the 12 principles articulated, nine are not met by ROM currently used in Victoria. Only one is fully met, one partially met and one cannot be conclusively decided either way in light of current knowledge.
CONCLUSIONS: ROM currently utilized in Victoria do not reflect the areas considered of most relevance and importance to consumers of mental health services. Priority should therefore be given to developing an alternative consumer-derived approach to determining the effectiveness of mental health services according to those most affected by them.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18720892     DOI: 10.1177/0020764008090285

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Soc Psychiatry        ISSN: 0020-7640


  4 in total

1.  Systematic Review of Self-Report Measures of General Mental Health and Wellbeing in Adolescent Mental Health.

Authors:  Natalie Bentley; Samantha Hartley; Sandra Bucci
Journal:  Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev       Date:  2019-06

2.  Parity of esteem and systems thinking: a theory informed qualitative inductive thematic analysis.

Authors:  Janine Owens; Karina Lovell; Abigail Brown; Penny Bee
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2022-10-19       Impact factor: 4.144

3.  Attitudes towards health among patients and staff in mental health services: a comparison of ratings of importance of different items of health.

Authors:  Henrika Jormfeldt
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  2009-04-26       Impact factor: 4.328

Review 4.  A systematic review of mental health outcome measures for young people aged 12 to 25 years.

Authors:  Benjamin Kwan; Debra J Rickwood
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2015-11-14       Impact factor: 3.630

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.