Literature DB >> 18719288

Automatic mental associations predict future choices of undecided decision-makers.

Silvia Galdi1, Luciano Arcuri, Bertram Gawronski.   

Abstract

Common wisdom holds that choice decisions are based on conscious deliberations of the available information about choice options. On the basis of recent insights about unconscious influences on information processing, we tested whether automatic mental associations of undecided individuals bias future choices in a manner such that these choices reflect the evaluations implied by earlier automatic associations. With the use of a computer-based, speeded categorization task to assess automatic mental associations (i.e., associations that are activated unintentionally, difficult to control, and not necessarily endorsed at a conscious level) and self-report measures to assess consciously endorsed beliefs and choice preferences, automatic associations of undecided participants predicted changes in consciously reported beliefs and future choices over a period of 1 week. Conversely, for decided participants, consciously reported beliefs predicted changes in automatic associations and future choices over the same period. These results indicate that decision-makers sometimes have already made up their mind at an unconscious level, even when they consciously indicate that they are still undecided.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18719288     DOI: 10.1126/science.1160769

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Science        ISSN: 0036-8075            Impact factor:   47.728


  25 in total

1.  He did what? The role of diagnosticity in revising implicit evaluations.

Authors:  Jeremy Cone; Melissa J Ferguson
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2014-11-03

2.  A neural basis for the effect of candidate appearance on election outcomes.

Authors:  Michael L Spezio; Antonio Rangel; Ramon Michael Alvarez; John P O'Doherty; Kyle Mattes; Alexander Todorov; Hackjin Kim; Ralph Adolphs
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2008-10-28       Impact factor: 3.436

3.  Awareness of implicit attitudes.

Authors:  Adam Hahn; Charles M Judd; Holen K Hirsh; Irene V Blair
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2013-12-02

4.  Psychophysiological prediction of choice: relevance to insight and drug addiction.

Authors:  Scott J Moeller; Greg Hajcak; Muhammad A Parvaz; Jonathan P Dunning; Nora D Volkow; Rita Z Goldstein
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2012-11-12       Impact factor: 13.501

Review 5.  Implicit social cognition: from measures to mechanisms.

Authors:  Brian A Nosek; Carlee Beth Hawkins; Rebecca S Frazier
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2011-03-02       Impact factor: 20.229

6.  Free will debates: Simple experiments are not so simple.

Authors:  W R Klemm
Journal:  Adv Cogn Psychol       Date:  2010-08-30

7.  A fast neural signature of motivated attention to consumer goods separates the sexes.

Authors:  Markus Junghöfer; Johanna Kissler; Harald T Schupp; Christian Putsche; Ludger Elling; Christian Dobel
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2010-09-20       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  Disgust sensitivity and the neurophysiology of left-right political orientations.

Authors:  Kevin B Smith; Douglas Oxley; Matthew V Hibbing; John R Alford; John R Hibbing
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-10-19       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  This outcome feels right! subjective evaluations of coin flip outcomes reflect previously stated preferences.

Authors:  Mariela E Jaffé; Rainer Greifeneder
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-07-02       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Do implicit attitudes predict actual voting behavior particularly for undecided voters?

Authors:  Malte Friese; Colin Tucker Smith; Thomas Plischke; Matthias Bluemke; Brian A Nosek
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-29       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.