Literature DB >> 18718690

Choosing the best endpoint.

Erik Christensen1.   

Abstract

Design and endpoints of clinical trials in hepatocellular carcinoma. Llovet JM, Di Bisceglie AM, Bruix J, Kramer BS, Lencioni R, Zhu AX, Sherman M, Schwartz M, Lotze M, Talwalkar J, Gores GJ; for the Panel of Experts in HCC-Design Clinical Trials. The design of clinical trials in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is complex because many patients have concurrent liver disease, which can confound the assessment of clinical benefit. There is an urgent need for high-quality trials in this disease. An expert panel was convened by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases to develop guidelines that provide a common framework for designing trials to facilitate comparability of results. According to these guidelines, randomized phase 2 trials with a time-to-event primary endpoint, such as time to progression, are pivotal in clinical research on HCC. Survival remains the main endpoint to measure effectiveness in phase 3 studies, whereas time to recurrence is proposed as an appropriate endpoint in the adjuvant setting. Because progression-free survival and disease-free survival are composite endpoints, they are more vulnerable than others in HCC clinical studies and may not be able to capture clinical benefits. Selection of the target population should be based on the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer staging system. New drugs should be tested in patients with well-preserved liver function (Child-Pugh A class). Patients assigned to the control arm should receive standard-of-care therapy, that is, chemoembolization for patients with intermediate-stage disease and sorafenib for patients with advanced-stage disease. Further research is needed to incorporate biomarkers and molecular imaging into clinical research in HCC. These surrogate markers may help to enrich study populations and maximize the cost-benefit ratio of trial execution. Design and conduct of phase 3 trials should be coordinated by centers with appropriate expertise in HCC. [Abstract reproduced by permission of J Natl Cancer Inst 2008;100:698-711.] Link to free abstract at: (http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/10/698).

Entities:  

Year:  2008        PMID: 18718690     DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2008.07.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hepatol        ISSN: 0168-8278            Impact factor:   25.083


  3 in total

1.  Treatment of mucopolysaccharidosis type II (Hunter syndrome) with idursulfase: the relevance of clinical trial end points.

Authors:  Emma Glamuzina; Emma Fettes; Katie Bainbridge; Victoria Crook; Niamh Finnegan; Lara Abulhoul; Ashok Vellodi
Journal:  J Inherit Metab Dis       Date:  2011-02-16       Impact factor: 4.982

2.  Randomized comparison of selective internal radiotherapy (SIRT) versus drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Michael B Pitton; Roman Kloeckner; Christian Ruckes; Gesine M Wirth; Waltraud Eichhorn; Marcus A Wörns; Arndt Weinmann; Mathias Schreckenberger; Peter R Galle; Gerd Otto; Christoph Dueber
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  2014-11-07       Impact factor: 2.740

3.  Conventional transarterial chemoembolization versus drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Roman Kloeckner; Arndt Weinmann; Friederike Prinz; Daniel Pinto dos Santos; Christian Ruckes; Christoph Dueber; Michael Bernhard Pitton
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2015-06-10       Impact factor: 4.430

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.