Literature DB >> 18718585

Feasibility of gastric electrical stimulation by percutaneous endoscopic transgastric electrodes.

Hanaa S Sallam1, Jiande D Z Chen, Pankaj Jay Pasricha.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Gastric electrical stimulation has been used for the treatment of drug refractory GI motility disorders and for the treatment of obesity. Both these indications have involved surgical placement of gastric electrodes, which adds to the complexity and cost of the procedure. Endoscopic placement is therefore an attractive alternative approach for this therapy.
OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to investigate the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of percutaneous endoscopic electrodes for gastric electrical stimulation. DESIGN AND
SETTING: Experimental animal study in hound dogs.
INTERVENTIONS: Percutaneous endoscopic transgastric electrode (PETE) placement was carried out by using a pair of gastric pacing wires attached to a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube. In addition, 4 pairs of gastric serosal electrodes were implanted surgically for comparison. The efficacy of the percutaneous endoscopic electrodes was defined by their ability to entrain gastric slow waves and the induction of dysrhythmia.
RESULTS: (1) The PETE recorded gastric slow waves comparable to the serosal electrodes. (2) Gastric electrical stimulation with long pulses delivered by the PETE, at a frequency of 10% higher than the intrinsic gastric slow wave frequency, entrained gastric slow waves. (3) Gastric electrical stimulation delivered by the PETE, at a tachygastric frequency, induced gastric dysrhythmia. LIMITATIONS: This was an animal study; however, its results are expected to be reproducible in humans, with PETE kept in place for even a longer duration than 6 to 8 weeks.
CONCLUSION: PETE placement is both feasible and safe. PETEs are effective, having a potential for use in treatment of both gastroparesis and obesity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18718585     DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2008.04.060

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc        ISSN: 0016-5107            Impact factor:   9.427


  7 in total

1.  Development of innovative techniques for the endoscopic implantation and securing of a novel, wireless, miniature gastrostimulator (with videos).

Authors:  Sanchali Deb; Shou-jiang Tang; Thomas L Abell; Tyler McLawhorn; Wen-Ding Huang; Christopher Lahr; S D Filip To; Julie Easter; J-C Chiao
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 9.427

Review 2.  Gastroparesis: pathogenesis, diagnosis and management.

Authors:  William L Hasler
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2011-07-19       Impact factor: 46.802

3.  Gastric electrical stimulation for gastroparesis: a goal greatly pursued, but not yet attained.

Authors:  Mauro Bortolotti
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-01-21       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 4.  Diabetic gastroparesis: diagnosis and management.

Authors:  Jing Ma; Christopher K Rayner; Karen L Jones; Michael Horowitz
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2009-05-29       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 5.  Treating morbid obesity in cirrhosis: A quest of holy grail.

Authors:  Naveen Kumar; Narendra Singh Choudhary
Journal:  World J Hepatol       Date:  2015-12-08

Review 6.  Advances in the Endoscopic Management of Obesity.

Authors:  Jason Behary; Vivek Kumbhari
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2015-05-28       Impact factor: 2.260

7.  Gastric electrical stimulation for the treatment of obesity: from entrainment to bezoars-a functional review.

Authors:  Martin P Mintchev
Journal:  ISRN Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-02-07
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.