Literature DB >> 18718374

Differences in aluminum equivalent values of endodontic sealers: conventional versus digital radiography.

B Guniz Baksi1, B Hakan Sen, Tan Firat Eyuboglu.   

Abstract

The aims of this study were to compare film and digital radiography in assessing the radiopacities of root canal sealers and to establish the relation in aluminum equivalent values of different methods. Standard disks of 5 different sealers were exposed together with an aluminum step wedge by using occlusal films and storage phosphor plates. Optical density of the sealers was evaluated by transmission densitometry, and mean gray values were determined by digital analysis. The data were analyzed by using two-way analysis of variance (P = .05). Pairwise comparisons were made by using Tukey post hoc and paired t tests (P = .05). The order from the most radiopaque to the most radiolucent sealer was the same for both methods; however, aluminum equivalent values determined by transmission densitometry were significantly higher (P < .01). Aluminum equivalent values of the 2 radiographic methods were 7%-20% different. The International Standards Organization standard for the radiopacity of dental root canal sealing materials needs modifications for digital systems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18718374     DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2008.06.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endod        ISSN: 0099-2399            Impact factor:   4.171


  2 in total

1.  The effects of image acquisition control of digital X-ray system on radiodensity quantification.

Authors:  Wook-Jin Seong; Hyeon-Cheol Kim; Soocheol Jeong; Youngcheul Heo; Woo-Bin Song; Mansur Ahmad
Journal:  Restor Dent Endod       Date:  2013-08-23

2.  Radiopacity evaluation of Portland and MTA-based cements by digital radiographic system.

Authors:  Alvaro Henrique Borges; Fabio Luiz Miranda Pedro; Alex Semanoff-Segundo; Carlos Eduardo Saraiva Miranda; Jesus Djalma Pécora; Antônio Miranda Cruz Filho
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2011 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.698

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.