Literature DB >> 18717957

Sunscreens containing the broad-spectrum UVA absorber, Mexoryl SX, prevent the cutaneous detrimental effects of UV exposure: a review of clinical study results.

Anny Fourtanier1, Dominique Moyal, Sophie Seité.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: UVA exposure of human skin mainly produces reactive oxygen species (ROS) leading to DNA, cell and tissue damage. It alters immune function, pigmentation and it is certainly responsible for a large part of photoaging changes. Moreover UVA is implicated in the etiology of several photodermatoses. As a consequence, to provide adequate protection, sunscreens or skin care products for daily use protective products need UVA absorbers combined with UVB ones. AIM: To assess the efficacy of sunscreens containing a broad-spectrum UVA absorber the Mexoryls SX or ecamsule and to compare formulations with and without it through a large number of clinical studies in human volunteers and patients.
METHODS: The following assessments were conducted: *Prevention of excessive pigmentation induced by UV exposure in Caucasian and Asian skins using a method that measures pigmentation protection factors (PPF). *Efficacy against DNA damage by measurement of pyrimidine dimer formation and p53 protein accumulation. *Protection of immune system using delayed type hypersensitivity (DTH) reactions to recall antigens, isomerization of urocanic acid (UCA), alteration of Langerhans cells (LC) density, morphology and function. *Reduction of epidermal and dermal alterations induced by repeated UVA or UV solar simulated radiation (SSR) using histology or immunohistology. *Prevention of the polymorphous light eruption (PMLE) in patients prone to develop this disease.
RESULTS: Mexoryls SX-containing formulations showed a dose-dependent level of protection against pigmentation. For a same sun protection factor (SPF) the higher the UVA protection was, the higher was the PPF. Pyrimidine dimer formation and p53 accumulation were significantly reduced by formulations with Mexoryls SX. In the studies looking at the suppression of DTH reactions to recall antigens by the different UV spectra, the LC alterations and the cis UCA formation, Mexoryls SX formulations always showed a higher protective potency than sunscreen without it even when the protection against erythema was similar (products with same SPF). Mexoryls SX formulations also prevented or significantly decreased to minimal, ferritin, tenascin and lysozyme expression induced by repeated UVA or SSR exposure. It also reduced the enhancement of collagenase 2 mRNA expression induced by SSR exposure. Finally PMLE study demonstrated that UVA protection was essential for the prevention of this photodermatose.
CONCLUSION: Mexoryls SX formulated in sunscreens or daily use products have been shown to be an effective UV absorber, leading to an increased efficacy of these products against a large number of biological damage induced by UVA, SSR or sun exposure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18717957     DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0781.2008.00365.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed        ISSN: 0905-4383            Impact factor:   3.135


  11 in total

1.  Urinary concentrations of benzophenone-3 and reproductive outcomes among women undergoing infertility treatment with assisted reproductive technologies.

Authors:  Lidia Mínguez-Alarcón; Yu-Han Chiu; Feiby L Nassan; Paige L Williams; John Petrozza; Jennifer B Ford; Antonia M Calafat; Russ Hauser; Jorge E Chavarro
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2019-05-02       Impact factor: 7.963

2.  Sunscreen or simulated sweat minimizes the impact of acute ultraviolet radiation on cutaneous microvascular function in healthy humans.

Authors:  S Tony Wolf; Craig W Berry; Anna E Stanhewicz; Lauren E Kenney; Sara B Ferguson; W Larry Kenney
Journal:  Exp Physiol       Date:  2019-05-09       Impact factor: 2.969

Review 3.  Visible light. Part II: Photoprotection against visible and ultraviolet light.

Authors:  Amaris N Geisler; Evan Austin; Julie Nguyen; Iltefat Hamzavi; Jared Jagdeo; Henry W Lim
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2021-02-25       Impact factor: 11.527

Review 4.  Exploring Mycosporine-Like Amino Acids (MAAs) as Safe and Natural Protective Agents against UV-Induced Skin Damage.

Authors:  Anjali Singh; Mária Čížková; Kateřina Bišová; Milada Vítová
Journal:  Antioxidants (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-27

5.  Evaluation of a sunscreen during a typical beach period.

Authors:  Daniela Rego; Lina Fernandes; Tânia Nascimento; Ana Grenha
Journal:  J Pharm Bioallied Sci       Date:  2010-01

Review 6.  Exposure to non-extreme solar UV daylight: spectral characterization, effects on skin and photoprotection.

Authors:  Claire Marionnet; Caroline Tricaud; Françoise Bernerd
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2014-12-23       Impact factor: 5.923

7.  Efficacy of phototherapy to treat facial ageing when using a red versus an amber LED: a protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Lidiane Rocha Mota; Lara Jansiski Motta; Ivone da Silva Duarte; Anna Carolina Ratto Tempestini Horliana; Daniela de Fátima Teixeira da Silva; Christiane Pavani
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-05-31       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 8.  Sunscreen lotions in the dermatological prescription: review of concepts and controversies.

Authors:  Flavia Alvim Sant'anna Addor; Carlos Baptista Barcaui; Elimar Elias Gomes; Omar Lupi; Carolina Reato Marçon; Hélio Amante Miot
Journal:  An Bras Dermatol       Date:  2022-01-14       Impact factor: 2.113

Review 9.  The Damaging Effects of Long UVA (UVA1) Rays: A Major Challenge to Preserve Skin Health and Integrity.

Authors:  Françoise Bernerd; Thierry Passeron; Isabelle Castiel; Claire Marionnet
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-07-26       Impact factor: 6.208

Review 10.  Cutaneous Photoprotection: A Review of the Current Status and Evolving Strategies.

Authors:  Kathleen Suozzi; Jack Turban; Michael Girardi
Journal:  Yale J Biol Med       Date:  2020-03-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.