Literature DB >> 18717378

A photoelastic and strain-gauge analysis of interface force transmission of internal-cone implants.

Kivanç Akça1, Murat C Cehreli.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to compare force transmissions in the peri-implant bone region of implants with various conical implant-abutment mating designs. Photoelastic models of solitary Bicon, Astra Tech, and synOcta and monoblock ITI implants were fabricated. Static vertical and 20-degree oblique forces of 75 N were applied on the implants in separate loading cases, and the generation of isochromatic fringes was observed and photographed in the field of a circular polariscope. Three-element strain gauges were bonded on the models in close proximity to the implants. Under the same loading protocol, the strain-gauge signals were digitized by a data-acquisition system and displayed on a computer using corresponding software at a sample rate of 10 kHz, and the principal strains were calculated. Isochromatic fringe orders around ITI and Astra Tech implants were similar at the collar region and slightly higher than around the Bicon implant under both loading conditions. Strains around the Bicon implant were lower than those around all implants tested under vertical loading (P < .05), whereas the strains around both ITI implants were similar and lower than those around the Astra Tech implant (P < .05). Under oblique loading, strains around both ITI implants were higher than those around other implants tested (P < .05). However, these differences do not seem to have any clinical relevance. Internal-cone implants have similar interface force transfer characteristics that resemble a one-part implant. To reduce stresses in the peri-implant region, implant diameter may be more effective than the type of implant.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18717378

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent        ISSN: 0198-7569            Impact factor:   1.840


  5 in total

1.  Stress distribution of multiple implant-supported prostheses: Photoelastic and strain gauge analyses of external hexagon and morse taper connections.

Authors:  Ana-Beatriz-Bueno-Carlini Bittencourt; Erica-de Oliveira-Paiva Rezende; Marcio Campaner; Sandro-Basso Bitencourt; Daniela-Micheline Dos Santos; Aldiéris-Alves Pesqueira; Marcelo-Coelho Goiato
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2022-03-01

2.  The impact of frenulum height on strains in maxillary denture bases.

Authors:  Altug Cilingir; Hakan Bilhan; Gokhan Baysal; Emin Sunbuloglu; Ergun Bozdag
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2013-11-28       Impact factor: 1.904

Review 3.  Bioengineering Tools Applied to Dentistry: Validation Methods for In Vitro and In Silico Analysis.

Authors:  Jefferson David Melo de Matos; Daher Antonio Queiroz; Leonardo Jiro Nomura Nakano; Valdir Cabral Andrade; Nathália de Carvalho Ramos Ribeiro; Alexandre Luiz Souto Borges; Marco Antonio Bottino; Guilherme da Rocha Scalzer Lopes
Journal:  Dent J (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-04

4.  Importance of a distal proximal contact on load transfer by implant-supported single adjacent crowns in posterior region of the mandible: a photoelastic study.

Authors:  Fábio Afrânio de Aguiar Júnior; Rodrigo Tiossi; Ana Paula Macedo; Maria da Gloria Chiarello de Mattos; Ricardo Faria Ribeiro; Renata Cristina Silveira Rodrigues
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2013 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.698

5.  Influence of Implant Neck Design on Peri-Implant Tissue Dimensions: A Comparative Study in Dogs.

Authors:  José Luis Calvo-Guirado; Raúl Jiménez-Soto; Carlos Pérez Albacete-Martínez; Manuel Fernández-Domínguez; Sérgio Alexandre Gehrke; José Eduardo Maté-Sánchez de Val
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2018-10-17       Impact factor: 3.623

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.