Literature DB >> 18717231

[Interval cancers as indicators of performance in screening programmes].

Stefano Ciatto1, Carlo Naldoni, Antonio Ponti, Livia Giordano, Daniela Giorgi, Alfonso Frigerio, Marcello Vettorazzi, Lauro Bucchi, Luigi Bisanti, Marco Petrella, Eugenio Paci, Gianni Saguatti, Dolores Santini, Marco Rosselli Del Turco, Marco Zappa, Paolo Giorgi Rossi, Vittorio Corsetti, Luisella Milanesio, Priscilla Sassoli de' Bianchi.   

Abstract

GISMa analyses the interval cancer (IS) topic providing guidelines and reference standards in addition to CE recommendations. IC identification is based on Cancer Registries (CR), if existing, or on hospital discharge records, in alternative. The optimal measure of IC frequency (inversely correlated with sensitivity) is the IC proportional incidence (observed IC/carcinomas expected in absence of screening). Other formulas (IC/IC + screen detected cancers; IC rate per 1000 negative screens) look less reliable. IC stage at diagnosis (if available through CR) must be compared with screen detected cancer and cancer detected in non-attenders. Review of mammograms preceding the IC (coded as screening error, minimal signs, or occult) should be done mainly with a blind procedure (IC mixed with negative controls), as this procedure is more representative of the original scenario and more respectful of radiologist's rights.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18717231

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Epidemiol Prev        ISSN: 1120-9763            Impact factor:   1.901


  1 in total

1.  Development and first application of an audit system for screening programs based on the PRECEDE-PROCEED model: an experience with breast cancer screening in the region of Lombardy (Italy).

Authors:  Danilo Cereda; Antonio Federici; Angela Guarino; Grazia Serantoni; Liliana Coppola; Patrizia Lemma; Paolo Giorgi Rossi
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2020-11-25       Impact factor: 3.295

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.