Literature DB >> 18717011

The respiratory quotient has little value in evaluating the state of feeding in burn patients.

Rungsinee A Liusuwan Manotok1, Tina L Palmieri, David G Greenhalgh.   

Abstract

The respiratory quotient (RQ) is frequently used to predict over or under feeding in burn patients. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the usefulness of RQ obtained from indirect calorimetry to assess feeding adequacy in pediatric burn Intensive Care Unit patients. We evaluated pediatric patients who received enteral nutrition by continuous duodenal tube feeding at a calculated goal rate in the burn intensive care unit from January 2003 to March 2006. RQ lower than 0.85 indicated underfeeding and RQ greater than 1.0 indicated overfeeding. Actual energy intake was recorded and compared with the energy intake divided by measured resting energy expenditure. Underfeeding was defined as a nutritional regimen providing <90% of caloric requirement; appropriate feeding was provision of within +/-10% of caloric requirements and overfeeding was provision of >110% of caloric requirements. On the basis of regression analysis, there was no relationship between energy intake divided by measured resting energy expenditure and RQ (R2 = 0.0059). There was also no relationship between measured RQ and the degree of feeding (N = 222). RQ <0.85 as an indicator of underfeeding had a low sensitivity of 40% and specificity of 77%. RQ >1.0 as an indicator of overfeeding had a poor sensitivity of 23% and a specificity of 85%. The RQ, used in isolation, is a poor method to assess over or underfeeding. Future prospective studies are needed to determine the optimal methodology for the assessment of nutritional needs in children with burn injury.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18717011     DOI: 10.1097/BCR.0b013e31817db9e3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Burn Care Res        ISSN: 1559-047X            Impact factor:   1.845


  4 in total

Review 1.  Early Enteral Nutrition for Burn Injury.

Authors:  Samuel P Mandell; Nicole S Gibran
Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)       Date:  2014-01-01       Impact factor: 4.730

2.  Comparison of respiratory quotient and resting energy expenditure in two regimens of enteral feeding - continuous vs. intermittent in head-injured critically ill patients.

Authors:  Indubala Maurya; Mridula Pawar; Rakesh Garg; Mohandeep Kaur; Rajesh Sood
Journal:  Saudi J Anaesth       Date:  2011-04

3.  Establishment and assessment of new formulas for energy consumption estimation in adult burn patients.

Authors:  Peng Xi; Wang Kaifa; Zhang Yong; Yan Hong; Wang Chao; Song Lijuan; Wang Hongyu; Wu Dan; Jiang Hua; Wang Shiliang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-16       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 4.  Energy expenditure and indirect calorimetry in critical illness and convalescence: current evidence and practical considerations.

Authors:  Hanneke Pierre Franciscus Xaverius Moonen; Karin Josephina Hubertina Beckers; Arthur Raymond Hubert van Zanten
Journal:  J Intensive Care       Date:  2021-01-12
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.