Literature DB >> 18716107

Analysis of enhancement pattern of flat gallbladder wall thickening on MDCT to differentiate gallbladder cancer from cholecystitis.

Soo Jin Kim1, Jeong Min Lee, Jae Young Lee, Se Hyung Kim, Joon Koo Han, Byung Ihn Choi, Jin Young Choi.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objective of our study was to determine the diagnostic value of analyzing the pattern of gallbladder wall enhancement on MDCT to characterize diffuse gallbladder wall thickening as benign or malignant.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: MDCT scans obtained during the portal venous phase in 78 patients with gallbladder wall thickening caused by various pathologic conditions were retrospectively reviewed by two blinded observers. The CT features of benign and malignant gallbladder wall thickening were compared by means of univariate and multivariate analyses. The study cases were then divided into five patterns according to enhancement pattern. Using these five patterns, two radiologists reviewed the MDCT images and recorded their diagnostic confidence for differentiating benign versus malignant cause on a 5-point scale. The diagnostic performance of CT was evaluated by each observer using a receiver operating characteristic curve analysis.
RESULTS: The thicknesses of the inner and outer layers ("thick" enhancing inner layer > or = 2.6 mm, "thin" outer layer < or = 3.4 mm), strong enhancement of the inner wall, and irregular contour of the affected wall were significant predictors for a malignant cause of gallbladder wall thickening (p < 0.001). The two-layer pattern with a strongly enhancing thick inner layer and weakly enhancing or nonenhancing outer layer and the one-layer pattern with a heterogeneously enhancing thick layer were patterns that were significantly associated with gallbladder cancer (p < 0.05). When we consider those two enhancing patterns as a sign of malignancy, the diagnostic accuracy of MDCT was 89.1% and 87.6% for the two observers, respectively.
CONCLUSION: Analyzing the enhancement pattern of a thickened gallbladder wall on MDCT is helpful in differentiating gallbladder cancer from benign inflammatory diseases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18716107     DOI: 10.2214/AJR.07.3331

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  33 in total

Review 1.  Cross-sectional Imaging of Gallbladder Carcinoma: An Update.

Authors:  Naveen Kalra; Pankaj Gupta; Manphool Singhal; Rajesh Gupta; Vikas Gupta; Radhika Srinivasan; Bhagwant R Mittal; Radha K Dhiman; Niranjan Khandelwal
Journal:  J Clin Exp Hepatol       Date:  2018-04-30

2.  Chronic inflammation-related radiological findings of gallbladder adenomyomatosis.

Authors:  Hyeon Jin Lee; Woo-Suk Chung; Ji Youn Kim; Ji Hae An; Shinyoung Park
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2020-02-18       Impact factor: 2.374

3.  Imaging Evaluation of Enhancement Patterns of Flat Gall Bladder Wall Thickening and Its Correlation with Clinical and Histopathological Findings.

Authors:  Manoj Mathur; Jasvir Singh; Devinder Pal Singh; Navneet Kaur; Saryu Gupta; Samrin Haq
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2017-04-01

4.  Radio-pathological Correlation of 18F-FDG PET in Characterizing Gallbladder Wall Thickening.

Authors:  Vikas Gupta; K S Vishnu; Thakur D Yadav; Yashwant R Sakaray; Santosh Irrinki; B R Mittal; N Kalra; K Vaiphei
Journal:  J Gastrointest Cancer       Date:  2019-12

Review 5.  Clinical characteristics of incidental or unsuspected gallbladder cancers diagnosed during or after cholecystectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Kui Sun Choi; Sae Byeol Choi; Pyoungjae Park; Wan Bae Kim; Sang Yong Choi
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-01-28       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  When to CHEUS contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasound to assess gallbladder wall thickening.

Authors:  Gareth Morris-Stiff; Shahid Farid
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2014-06-07       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 7.  A literature review of radiological findings to guide the diagnosis of gallbladder adenomyomatosis.

Authors:  Abdulrahman Y Hammad; John T Miura; Kiran K Turaga; Fabian M Johnston; Mark D Hohenwalter; T Clark Gamblin
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2016-01-06       Impact factor: 3.647

8.  CT diagnosis of gallbladder adenomyomatosis: importance of enhancing mucosal epithelium, the "cotton ball sign".

Authors:  Hyun Kyung Yang; Jeong Min Lee; Mi Hye Yu; Sang Min Lee; Jinyoung Park; Na Young Han; Kyoungbun Lee; Jin-Young Jang; Joon Koo Han
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-04-09       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Actual status of clinical diagnosis in patients with primary gallbladder cancer associated with adenomyomatosis.

Authors:  Keita Kai; Hiroyuki Irie; Takao Ide; Masanori Masuda; Kenji Kitahara; Atsushi Miyoshi; Kohji Miyazaki; Hirokazu Noshiro; Osamu Tokunaga
Journal:  Indian J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-09-10

10.  Intraluminal versus infiltrating gallbladder carcinoma: clinical presentation, ultrasound and computed tomography.

Authors:  Tze-Yu Lee; Sheung-Fat Ko; Chung-Cheng Huang; Shu-Hang Ng; Jiun-Lung Liang; Hsuan-Ying Huang; Min-Chi Chen; Shyr-Ming Sheen-Chen
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-12-07       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.