Literature DB >> 18715971

Validation of a consciousness level scale for palliative care.

F Gonçalves1, M J Bento, M Alvarenga, I Costa, L Costa.   

Abstract

The main objective of this study is to validate a Consciousness Scale for palliative care. The scale was named Consciousness Scale for palliative care (CSPC). The validation had two phases: 1) face validity--the scale was assessed by seven healthcare professionals, both doctors and nurses, experienced in palliative care; 2) reliability and construct validity--performed by four investigators, two nurses and two doctors. The construct validation was performed by comparing the CSPC with a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) of 100 mm, anchored in the terms 'awake' and 'unarousable', and then with the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS). In this study, all four observers completed 44 periods of observation relative to 38 patients resulting in a total of 176 observations. In the phase of face validation, there were no discrepancies in relation to the issue: the scale provides measures for measurement; the scale can be useful to clinical practice; the scale can improve communication among professionals and the scale is easy to use. As a measure of internal consistency, Cronbach's alpha was found to be very high (0.99). The inter-rater reliability was also very high with an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.99 (P < 0.001). The correlation of the CSPC to the VAS was 0.94 (P < 0.001) and the CSPC to the GCS was -0.82 (P < 0.001). The CSPC can be a very useful tool for assessing consciousness in palliative care patients. It is very ease to use, not time consuming and can be used with minimal training. Communication between professionals can be improved in the clinical setting and in the research environment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18715971     DOI: 10.1177/0269216308094104

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Palliat Med        ISSN: 0269-2163            Impact factor:   4.762


  3 in total

1.  A survey of the sedation practice of Portuguese palliative care teams.

Authors:  Ferraz Gonçalves; Aida Cordero; Ana Almeida; Arlindo Cruz; Céu Rocha; Madalena Feio; Paula Silva; Salomé Barbas; Sandra Neves
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2012-03-24       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  Identification and evaluation of observational measures for the assessment and/or monitoring of level of consciousness in adult palliative care patients: A systematic review for I-CAN-CARE.

Authors:  Anna-Maria Krooupa; Bella Vivat; Stephen McKeever; Elena Marcus; Joseph Sawyer; Paddy Stone
Journal:  Palliat Med       Date:  2019-08-22       Impact factor: 5.713

Review 3.  How to measure the effects and potential adverse events of palliative sedation? An integrative review.

Authors:  Alazne Belar; María Arantzamendi; Sheila Payne; Nancy Preston; Maaike Rijpstra; Jeroen Hasselaar; Lukas Radbruch; Michael Vanderelst; Julie Ling; Carlos Centeno
Journal:  Palliat Med       Date:  2020-12-14       Impact factor: 4.762

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.