Literature DB >> 18715955

The effect of leaf-level spatial variability in photosynthetic capacity on biochemical parameter estimates using the Farquhar model: a theoretical analysis.

Charles P Chen1, Xin-Guang Zhu, Stephen P Long.   

Abstract

Application of the widely used Farquhar model of photosynthesis in interpretation of gas exchange data assumes that photosynthetic properties are homogeneous throughout the leaf. Previous studies showed that heterogeneity in stomatal conductance (g(s)) across a leaf could affect the shape of the measured leaf photosynthetic CO(2) uptake rate (A) versus intercellular CO(2) concentration (C(i)) response curve and, in turn, estimation of the critical biochemical parameters of this model. These are the maximum rates of carboxylation (V(c,max)), whole-chain electron transport (J(max)), and triose-P utilization (V(TPU)). The effects of spatial variation in V(c,max,) J(max), and V(TPU) on estimation of leaf averages of these parameters from A-C(i) curves measured on a whole leaf have not been investigated. A mathematical model incorporating defined degrees of spatial variability in V(c,max) and J(max) was constructed. One hundred and ten theoretical leaves were simulated, each with the same average V(c,max) and J(max), but different coefficients of variation of the mean (CV(VJ)) and varying correlation between V(c,max) and J(max) (Omega). Additionally, the interaction of variation in V(c,max) and J(max) with heterogeneity in V(TPU), g(s), and light gradients within the leaf was also investigated. Transition from V(c,max)- to J(max)-limited photosynthesis in the A-C(i) curve was smooth in the most heterogeneous leaves, in contrast to a distinct inflection in the absence of heterogeneity. Spatial variability had little effect on the accuracy of estimation of V(c,max) and J(max) from A-C(i) curves when the two varied in concert (Omega = 1.0), but resulted in underestimation of both parameters when they varied independently (up to 12.5% in V(c,max) and 17.7% in J(max) at CV(VJ) = 50%; Omega = 0.3). Heterogeneity in V(TPU) also significantly affected parameter estimates, but effects of heterogeneity in g(s) or light gradients were comparatively small. If V(c,max) and J(max) derived from such heterogeneous leaves are used in models to project leaf photosynthesis, actual A is overestimated by up to 12% at the transition between V(c,max)- and J(max)-limited photosynthesis. This could have implications for both crop production and Earth system models, including projections of the effects of atmospheric change.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18715955      PMCID: PMC2556818          DOI: 10.1104/pp.108.124024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plant Physiol        ISSN: 0032-0889            Impact factor:   8.340


  17 in total

Review 1.  Models of photosynthesis.

Authors:  G D Farquhar; J A Berry
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 8.340

2.  The growth of soybean under free air [CO(2)] enrichment (FACE) stimulates photosynthesis while decreasing in vivo Rubisco capacity.

Authors:  Carl J Bernacchi; Patrick B Morgan; Donald R Ort; Stephen P Long
Journal:  Planta       Date:  2004-07-14       Impact factor: 4.116

3.  MORE EFFICIENT PLANTS: A Consequence of Rising Atmospheric CO2?

Authors:  Bert G. Drake; Miquel A. Gonzalez-Meler; Steve P. Long
Journal:  Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol       Date:  1997-06

4.  Comparison of photosynthetic damage from arthropod herbivory and pathogen infection in understory hardwood saplings.

Authors:  Mihai Aldea; Jason G Hamilton; Joseph P Resti; Arthur R Zangerl; May R Berenbaum; Thomas D Frank; Evan H Delucia
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2006-06-07       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  The Calvin cycle revisited.

Authors:  Christine A Raines
Journal:  Photosynth Res       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 3.573

6.  O(2)-insensitive photosynthesis in c(3) plants : its occurrence and a possible explanation.

Authors:  T D Sharkey
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1985-05       Impact factor: 8.340

7.  The Sequence of Change within the Photosynthetic Apparatus of Wheat following Short-Term Exposure to Ozone.

Authors:  P K Farage; S P Long; E G Lechner; N R Baker
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 8.340

Review 8.  Gas exchange measurements, what can they tell us about the underlying limitations to photosynthesis? Procedures and sources of error.

Authors:  S P Long; C J Bernacchi
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2003-09-25       Impact factor: 6.992

9.  Net carbon storage in a poplar plantation (POPFACE) after three years of free-air CO2 enrichment.

Authors:  B Gielen; C Calfapietra; M Lukac; V E Wittig; P De Angelis; I A Janssens; M C Moscatelli; S Grego; M F Cotrufo; D L Godbold; M R Hoosbeek; S P Long; F Miglietta; A Polle; C J Bernacchi; P A Davey; R Ceulemans; G E Scarascia-Mugnozza
Journal:  Tree Physiol       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 4.196

10.  Fitting photosynthetic carbon dioxide response curves for C(3) leaves.

Authors:  Thomas D Sharkey; Carl J Bernacchi; Graham D Farquhar; Eric L Singsaas
Journal:  Plant Cell Environ       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 7.228

View more
  2 in total

1.  Structural and metabolic transitions of C4 leaf development and differentiation defined by microscopy and quantitative proteomics in maize.

Authors:  Wojciech Majeran; Giulia Friso; Lalit Ponnala; Brian Connolly; Mingshu Huang; Edwin Reidel; Cankui Zhang; Yukari Asakura; Nazmul H Bhuiyan; Qi Sun; Robert Turgeon; Klaas J van Wijk
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2010-11-16       Impact factor: 11.277

2.  Direct observation of local xylem embolisms induced by soil drying in intact Zea mays leaves.

Authors:  Jeongeun Ryu; Bae Geun Hwang; Yangmin X Kim; Sang Joon Lee
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2016-03-05       Impact factor: 6.992

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.