Literature DB >> 1871591

Toxicity equivalents and EPA's risk assessment of 2,3,7,8-TCDD.

D G Barnes1.   

Abstract

Toxicity equivalent factors (TEFs) have proved useful in estimating the toxicity of complex mixtures of chlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins and dibenzofurans (CDDs/CDFs). An international consensus has formed around a specific set of TEF values as interim solution for addressing environmental contamination by CDDs/CDFs. This procedure capitalizes on the congener-specific analytical results that are more routinely available in recent years. The TEF approach should be updated as necessary and replaced by more definitive bioassay approaches as soon as practicable. In an independent activity, the USEPA considered a proposal to change (reduce) the cancer potency ascribed to 2,3,7,8-TCDD by a factor of 16. The recommendation was based upon an analysis of the literature and the Agency's earlier risk assessment. The proposal was reviewed by the Science Advisory Board, a group of outside scientific advisors. Subsequently, the Agency decided against making any changes in its assessment at this time. However, it is likely that a reassessment will be conducted shortly that will incorporate new data and a new approach to estimating of cancer risks posed by 2,3,7,8-TCDD.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1871591     DOI: 10.1016/0048-9697(91)90008-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  6 in total

Review 1.  The 2005 World Health Organization reevaluation of human and Mammalian toxic equivalency factors for dioxins and dioxin-like compounds.

Authors:  Martin Van den Berg; Linda S Birnbaum; Michael Denison; Mike De Vito; William Farland; Mark Feeley; Heidelore Fiedler; Helen Hakansson; Annika Hanberg; Laurie Haws; Martin Rose; Stephen Safe; Dieter Schrenk; Chiharu Tohyama; Angelika Tritscher; Jouko Tuomisto; Mats Tysklind; Nigel Walker; Richard E Peterson
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2006-07-07       Impact factor: 4.849

2.  Automated dose-response analysis and comparative toxicogenomic evaluation of the hepatic effects elicited by TCDD, TCDF, and PCB126 in C57BL/6 mice.

Authors:  Anna K Kopec; Lyle D Burgoon; Daher Ibrahim-Aibo; Ashley R Burg; Andrea W Lee; Colleen Tashiro; Dave Potter; Bonnie Sharratt; Jack R Harkema; J Craig Rowlands; Robert A Budinsky; Timothy R Zacharewski
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2010-08-11       Impact factor: 4.849

3.  Toxicological potency of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin relative to 100 other compounds: a relative potency analysis of in vitro and in vivo test data.

Authors:  T D Jones
Journal:  Arch Environ Contam Toxicol       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 2.804

Review 4.  The Ah Receptor: Adaptive Metabolism, Ligand Diversity, and the Xenokine Model.

Authors:  Mele N Avilla; Kristen M C Malecki; Mark E Hahn; Rachel H Wilson; Christopher A Bradfield
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2020-04-07       Impact factor: 3.739

Review 5.  Environmental toxicology of polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins and polychlorinated dibenzofurans.

Authors:  J P Vanden Heuvel; G Lucier
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 9.031

6.  The development of response surface pathway design to reduce animal numbers in toxicity studies.

Authors:  Sagita Dewi; Tore Aune; John A Aasen Bunæs; Adrian J Smith; Stig Larsen
Journal:  BMC Pharmacol Toxicol       Date:  2014-03-25       Impact factor: 2.483

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.