BACKGROUND: Currently two pretreatment prognostic models with limited accuracy (65-67%) can be used to predict survival in patients with localized renal cell carcinoma (RCC). OBJECTIVE: We set out to develop a more accurate pretreatment model for predicting RCC-specific mortality after nephrectomy for all stages of RCC. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: The data originated from a series of prospectively recorded contemporary cases of patients treated with radical or partial nephrectomy between 1984 and 2006. Model development was performed using data from 2474 patients from five centers and external validation was performed using data from 1972 patients from seven centers. MEASUREMENTS: The probability of RCC-specific mortality was modeled using Cox regression. The significance of the predictors was confirmed using competing risks analyses, which account for mortality from other causes. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Median follow-up in patients who did not die of RCC-specific causes was 4.2 yr and 3.5 yr in the development and validation cohorts, respectively. The freedom from cancer-specific mortality rates in the nomogram development cohort were 75.4% at 5 yr after nephrectomy and 68.3% at 10 yr after nephrectomy. All variables except gender achieved independent predictor status. In the external validation cohort the nomogram predictions were 88.1% accurate at 1 yr, 86.8% accurate at 2 yr, 86.8% accurate at 5 yr, and 84.2% accurate at 10 yr. CONCLUSIONS: Our model substantially exceeds the accuracy of the existing pretreatment models. Consequently, the proposed nomogram-based predictions may be used as benchmark data for pretreatment decision making in patients with various stages of RCC.
BACKGROUND: Currently two pretreatment prognostic models with limited accuracy (65-67%) can be used to predict survival in patients with localized renal cell carcinoma (RCC). OBJECTIVE: We set out to develop a more accurate pretreatment model for predicting RCC-specific mortality after nephrectomy for all stages of RCC. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: The data originated from a series of prospectively recorded contemporary cases of patients treated with radical or partial nephrectomy between 1984 and 2006. Model development was performed using data from 2474 patients from five centers and external validation was performed using data from 1972 patients from seven centers. MEASUREMENTS: The probability of RCC-specific mortality was modeled using Cox regression. The significance of the predictors was confirmed using competing risks analyses, which account for mortality from other causes. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Median follow-up in patients who did not die of RCC-specific causes was 4.2 yr and 3.5 yr in the development and validation cohorts, respectively. The freedom from cancer-specific mortality rates in the nomogram development cohort were 75.4% at 5 yr after nephrectomy and 68.3% at 10 yr after nephrectomy. All variables except gender achieved independent predictor status. In the external validation cohort the nomogram predictions were 88.1% accurate at 1 yr, 86.8% accurate at 2 yr, 86.8% accurate at 5 yr, and 84.2% accurate at 10 yr. CONCLUSIONS: Our model substantially exceeds the accuracy of the existing pretreatment models. Consequently, the proposed nomogram-based predictions may be used as benchmark data for pretreatment decision making in patients with various stages of RCC.
Authors: Samuel D Kaffenberger; Opal Lin-Tsai; Kelly L Stratton; Todd M Morgan; Daniel A Barocas; Sam S Chang; Michael S Cookson; S Duke Herrell; Joseph A Smith; Peter E Clark Journal: Urol Oncol Date: 2014-10-31 Impact factor: 3.498
Authors: Todd M Morgan; Dominic Tang; Kelly L Stratton; Daniel A Barocas; Christopher B Anderson; Justin R Gregg; Sam S Chang; Michael S Cookson; S Duke Herrell; Joseph A Smith; Peter E Clark Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2011-01-28 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Mark W Ball; Michael A Gorin; Sam B Bhayani; Craig G Rogers; Michael D Stifelman; Jihad H Kaouk; Homayoun Zargar; Susan Marshall; Jeffrey A Larson; Haider M Rahbar; Bruce J Trock; Phillip M Pierorazio; Mohamad E Allaf Journal: Urol Oncol Date: 2014-12-11 Impact factor: 3.498
Authors: Sabine Brookman-May; Matthias May; Vincenzo Ficarra; Manuela Christine Kainz; Karin Kampel-Kettner; Stephanie Kohlschreiber; Valentina Wenzl; Meike Schneider; Maximilian Burger; Wolf F Wieland; Wolfgang Otto; Derya Tilki; Christian Gilfrich; Markus Hohenfellner; Sascha Pahernik; Thomas F Chromecki; Christian Stief; Richard Zigeuner Journal: World J Urol Date: 2012-08-19 Impact factor: 4.226
Authors: S P K Jagdev; W Gregory; N S Vasudev; P Harnden; S Sim; D Thompson; J Cartledge; P J Selby; R E Banks Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2010-11-09 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: S L Wood; M Rogers; D A Cairns; A Paul; D Thompson; N S Vasudev; P J Selby; R E Banks Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2010-06-08 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Andreas M Hötker; Christoph A Karlo; Junting Zheng; Chaya S Moskowitz; Paul Russo; Hedvig Hricak; Oguz Akin Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2016-03-02 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: N S Vasudev; S Sim; D A Cairns; R E Ferguson; R A Craven; A Stanley; J Cartledge; D Thompson; P J Selby; R E Banks Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2009-10-06 Impact factor: 7.640