Literature DB >> 18713908

Determinants of tidal volumes with adaptive support ventilation: a multicenter observational study.

Dave A Dongelmans1, Denise P Veelo, Alexander Bindels, Jan M Binnekade, Kees Koppenol, Matty Koopmans, Joke C Korevaar, Michael A Kuiper, Marcus J Schultz.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: In the present study, we investigated the behavior of adaptive support ventilation (ASV) in patients after cardiothoracic surgery. We determined tidal volumes (Vt) and factors that influence Vt with this mode of microprocessor-controlled mechanical ventilation (MV).
METHODS: This was a prospective, multicenter, observational study in three Dutch intensive care units over a 5-mo period. MV data were collected during steady-state after arrival in the intensive care unit.
RESULTS: Data were collected for 346 consecutive patients after cardiothoracic surgery: 262 patients weaned with ASV, and 84 patients weaned with pressure-controlled/pressure-support MV. With ASV the mean (+/- sd) Vt expressed per kilogram actual body weight was 7.1 +/- 1.6 mL. Expressed per kilogram ideal body weight (IBW), Vt was 8.3 +/- 1.5 mL. In patients with a correctly set body weight (SBW) (i.e., the IBW), Vt was 8.1 +/- 1.4 mL/kg. With pressure-controlled/pressure-support-MV Vt was 7.3 +/- 1.4 mL/kg IBW (P < 0.001 vs ASV). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed Vt with ASV to be dependent on only two parameters: respiratory rate and the correctness of SBW.
CONCLUSIONS: Vt with ASV seems to be dependent on two parameters: respiratory rate and the correctness of SBW. The first factor is not clinically important because respiratory rate is automatically chosen by the microprocessor. The second factor is clinically important because it is the only factor that can be influenced by the operator. Our data show the importance of setting the correct weight with ASV. With ASV, Vt are >8 mL/kg IBW in a substantial number of patients. Randomized clinical trials should be performed to compare ASV with other ventilation modes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18713908     DOI: 10.1213/ane.0b013e31817f1dcf

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  6 in total

1.  Adaptive support ventilation versus conventional ventilation for total ventilatory support in acute respiratory failure.

Authors:  Giorgio A Iotti; Andrea Polito; Mirko Belliato; Daniela Pasero; Gaetan Beduneau; Marc Wysocki; Josef X Brunner; Antonio Braschi; Laurent Brochard; Jordi Mancebo; V Marco Ranieri; Jean-Christophe M Richard; Arthur S Slutsky
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2010-05-26       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  Evaluation of fully automated ventilation: a randomized controlled study in post-cardiac surgery patients.

Authors:  François Lellouche; Pierre-Alexandre Bouchard; Serge Simard; Erwan L'Her; Marc Wysocki
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2013-01-22       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  Automated control of mechanical ventilation during general anaesthesia: study protocol of a bicentric observational study (AVAS).

Authors:  Dirk Schädler; Georg Miestinger; Tobias Becher; Inéz Frerichs; Norbert Weiler; Christoph Hörmann
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-05-10       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  Advanced modes of mechanical ventilation and optimal targeting schemes.

Authors:  Matthias van der Staay; Robert L Chatburn
Journal:  Intensive Care Med Exp       Date:  2018-08-22

5.  Adaptive Support Ventilation Attenuates Ventilator Induced Lung Injury: Human and Animal Study.

Authors:  Yu-Ling Dai; Chin-Pyng Wu; Gee-Gwo Yang; Hung Chang; Chung-Kan Peng; Kun-Lun Huang
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2019-11-21       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 6.  Proportional modes of ventilation: technology to assist physiology.

Authors:  Annemijn H Jonkman; Michela Rauseo; Guillaume Carteaux; Irene Telias; Michael C Sklar; Leo Heunks; Laurent J Brochard
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2020-08-11       Impact factor: 17.440

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.