Alay S Banker1. 1. Banker's Retina Clinic and Laser Centre, 5 Subhash Society, Behind Ishvar Bhuvan, Ahmedabad 380 009, India. alay.banker@gmail.com
Abstract
Ocular manifestations can occur in up to 50% of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)/acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS) patients and posterior segment involvement is the most common presentation. The posterior segment manifestations of AIDS can be divided into four categories: retinal vasculopathy, opportunistic infections, unusual malignancies and neuro-ophthalmologic abnormalities. Retinal microvasculopathy and cytomegalovirus (CMV) retinitis are the most common manifestations, even in the era of highly active anti-retroviral therapy (HAART). Highly active anti-retroviral therapy has been shown to cause regression of CMV retinitis, reduce the incidence of CMV-related retinal detachments, and prolong patient survival. Immune recovery uveitis is a new cause of vision loss in patients on HAART. Diagnosis and treatment are guided by the particular conditions and immune status of the patient.
Ocular manifestations can occur in up to 50% of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)/acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS) patients and posterior segment involvement is the most common presentation. The posterior segment manifestations of AIDS can be divided into four categories: retinal vasculopathy, opportunistic infections, unusual malignancies and neuro-ophthalmologic abnormalities. Retinal microvasculopathy and cytomegalovirus (CMV) retinitis are the most common manifestations, even in the era of highly active anti-retroviral therapy (HAART). Highly active anti-retroviral therapy has been shown to cause regression of CMV retinitis, reduce the incidence of CMV-related retinal detachments, and prolong patient survival. Immune recovery uveitis is a new cause of vision loss in patients on HAART. Diagnosis and treatment are guided by the particular conditions and immune status of the patient.
As per the United Nations acquired immune deficiency
syndrome (UNAIDS)/World Health organization (WHO)
acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS) epidemic
update, December 2006, there are about 39.5 million (34.1-47.1
million) people globally living with human immunodeficiency
virus (HIV).1 Out of these, about 5.2-5.7 million people are
from India.2 In spite of the widespread use of highly active
antiretroviral therapy (HAART) today, ocular manifestations
of AIDS at some point affect 50 to 75% of infected persons, of
which posterior segment involvement is the most common.3
Also, the spectrum of ocular manifestations of AIDS in the
developing world differs from that of developed nations.4
The purpose of this article is to review all posterior segment
manifestations of AIDS. The posterior segment manifestations
in AIDSpatients can be divided into four main categories:
vasculopathy, opportunistic infections, unusual malignancies
and neuro-ophthalmologic abnormalities.
Vasculopathy
Microvasculopathy is the most common ocular manifestation
of AIDS, seen in about 40% to 60% of HIV-positivepatients.5
Clinically, it manifests as cotton-wool spots located in
the posterior pole and may simulate small patches of
cytomegalovirus (CMV) retinitis [Figure 1]. However, unlike
CMV retinitis, cotton-wool spots are not associated with
large amounts of hemorrhages, subtle iritis, or mild posterior
vitritis. They have more rounded borders, and are usually
oriented along the vascular arcades, and represent focal
areas of ischemia in the nerve fiber layer. Most patients with
retinal microvasculopathy are asymptomatic. Treatment is not
indicated in most cases. The prevalence of microvasculopathy
is inversely proportional to CD4+ count.
Figure 1
Microvasculopathy
Large vessel disease
Large vessel occlusions, including central and branch retinal
vein occlusions and branch retinal artery occlusions are
uncommon and usually occur in association with viral retinitis,
infiltrative lymphomatous optic neuropathy, and as isolated
abnormalities.6-8 Frosted branch vasculitis has been
associated with CMV retinitis in AIDS.9
Posterior segment opportunistic infections
Ocular posterior segment opportunistic infections are
manifestations of disseminated disease in AIDSpatients and
are recognized either as necrotizing retinitis or as unifocal
or multifocal choroiditis. Retinitis is more common than
choroiditis. Retinitis in quiet eyes occurs in patients with
lower CD4+ counts and is more commonly due to CMV and
progressive outer retinal necrosis (PORN), while retinitis
in inflamed eyes usually occur in patients with higher
CD4+ counts and is more commonly due to acute retinal
necrosis (ARN), toxoplasmosis, syphilis, or late stages of
cryptococcus.
Cytomegalovirus retinitis
Cytomegalovirus retinitis is the most common AIDS-related
ocular opportunistic infection and can develop in up to 40 to
50% of AIDSpatients prior to HAART.5 Although its incidence
has declined markedly since the advent of HAART in the
western world, it still remains the leading cause of ocular
morbidity in the developing countries.10 In India, CMV
retinitis still remains the commonest ocular manifestation
in AIDS cases.11,12 In our series of 1286 cases, the
incidence of CMV retinitis remains high even in the era of HAART
[Table 1]. It may be unilateral to start with, but up to 52%
will eventually develop bilateral disease. Cytomegalovirus
retinitis occurs almost exclusively in patients whose
CD4+ counts are <50 cells/µl.13 However, its diagnosis cannot
be excluded based on CD4+ count alone in patients taking
HAART. In exceptionally rare instances, CMV retinitis may
develop in patients with elevated CD4+ counts shortly after
the initiation of HAART.
Table 1
Ocular manifestations in 1286 acquired immunodeficiency syndrome cases
: There are three clinical forms of CMV
retinitis. The classical form (pizza pie retinopathy or cottage
cheese with ketchup) is characterized by confluent retinal
necrosis with hemorrhage that develops mostly in the posterior
retina [Figure 2A]. The advancing edge of these lesions is
usually very sharp and spreads contiguously. Typically, over
several weeks untreated lesions progress to full-thickness
necrosis with resultant retinal gliosis and pigment epithelial
atrophy. Patients often have loss of visual field or visual acuity
and scotoma. In contrast, the indolent form is recognized as
a granular lesion in the peripheral retina, often with little or
no hemorrhage [Figure 2B]. Patients may notice floaters, or
they may be asymptomatic. A third uncommon presentation
is frosted branch angiitis [Figure 2C]. Because approximately
15% of patients with active CMV retinitis are asymptomatic,
routine screening with dilated indirect ophthalmoscopy
has been recommended at three-month intervals in patients
with CD4+ counts less than 50 cells/µl.14 Cytomegalovirus
retinitis may result in either serous or rhegmatogenous retinal
detachment, although the latter is much more common.
Rhegmatogenous retinal detachment has been reported in 13
to 29% of patients with CMV retinitis and may occur during the
active or healed phase of the disease. However, since the advent
of HAART, incidence of retinal detachment has decreased by
approximately 60 to 77% in the western world.15 In contrast,
in our series, the incidence of CMV-related retinal detachment
was found to have increased [Table 1]. This may be due to
higher number of patients taking inappropriate HAART, or
people taking HAART have larger areas of healed CMV retinitis
which eventually develop necrotic holes leading to detachment.
Various approaches including pars plana vitrectomy (PPV)
with gas or silicone oil tamponade (preferably high viscosity
5000CS), scleral buckling and laser demarcation have been
effective in the repair of retinal detachments related to CMV
retinitis.16
Figure 2A
(A) Classic CMV retinitis: pizza-pie appearance
Figure 2B
(B) Granular variety of CMV retinitis
Figure 2C
(C) Frosted-branch angiitis variety of CMV retinitis
: Treatment of CMV retinitis is individualized
and depends upon the location of the active retinitis and the
immune status of the patient. Currently available anti-CMV
agents include ganciclovir and its prodrug valganciclovir,
foscarnet, cidofovir, fomivirsen, ganciclovir implant and oral
valganciclovir. A brief summary of these drugs is provided
in Table 2.
Table 2
Medications for cytomegalovirus retinitis
Necrotizing herpetic retinopathy
Necrotizing herpetic retinopathy (NHR) is a continuous
spectrum of posterior segment inflammation induced by
herpes viruses, most commonly varicella zoster virus (VZV).
Its two most recognizable clinical patterns are ARN [Figure 3]
and PORN [Figure 4]. Usually, the former occurs in healthy
persons and AIDSpatients with only mild immune dysfunction
and elevated CD4+ counts, whereas the latter usually develops
in those who are severely immunosuppressed.17 In addition
to varicella zoster virus, herpes simplex virus and CMV have
been isolated in patients with ARN, and herpes simplex in
eyes with PORN.18 The differential features between ARN,
PORN and CMV retinitis are given in Table 3.
Figure 3
Acute retinal necrosis
Figure 4
Progressive outer retinal necrosis
Table 3
Differentiating features of three types of viral retinitis in acquired immunodeficiency syndrome
Aggressive medical treatment with appropriate systemic
antivirals may improve long-term visual outcome in patients
with NHR. Treatment of ARN includes intravenous acyclovir
(1500 mg/sq, meter/day in three divided doses) for seven to
10 days followed by oral acyclovir (800 mg five times daily) for
six weeks.12 Following resolution of retinitis, prophylactic laser
barrage is considered beneficial to prevent retinal detachment.
However, visual loss due to progressive infection, optic nerve
sheath effusion, or, in most cases, retinal detachment occurs
in up to 70 to 85% of patients. Retinal detachment requires
vitrectomy, intravitreal silicone oil tamponade and endolaser
photocoagulation.
Toxoplasmosis
In the majority of AIDS cases, toxoplasmosis is a primary
infection rather than a reactivation. Ocular toxoplasmosis
in AIDS, in contrast to toxoplasmosis in immunocompetent
individuals, is often bilateral, multifocal, and not associated
with chorioretinal scars. It may cause a variety of ocular
abnormalities including iritis, vitritis, choroiditis, multifocal or
diffuse necrotizing retinitis [Figure 5], papillitis or retrobulbar
neuritis, or outer retinal toxoplasmosis.19 Toxoplasma
retinitis may resemble CMV retinitis; however, intraocular
inflammation is usually more severe and hemorrhages
are fewer. Treatment with standard antiparasitic drugs
(pyrimethamine, clindamycin, sulfonamides) is successful in
controlling ocular toxoplasmosis in most cases.
Figure 5
Toxoplasmic retinochoroiditis
Choroiditis
Pneumocystis
Ocular manifestations of P. carinii include conjunctivitis, orbital
mass, optic neuropathy, and choroiditis.20 It is seen as classically
bilateral and multifocal yellowish, well-demarcated, choroidal
lesions located in the posterior pole not associated with vitritis,
iritis, or vasculitis [Figure 6].21 Ocular lesions
respond in most cases to induction and subsequent maintenance treatment with
systemic pentamidine, trimethoprim and sulfamethoxazole,
or dapsone.
Figure 6
Pneumocystic choroiditis
Cryptococcus
Cryptococcus meningitis is the most common cause of AIDS-
related neuro-ophthalmolgic lesions. Cryptococcal choroiditis
may be multifocal, solitary, or confluent and may be associated
with eyelid nodule, conjunctival mass, granulomatous iritis,
iris mass, vitritis, necrotizing retinitis, endophthalmitis, and
optic neuritis [Figure 7].22 Fluconazole maintenance
therapy 200 mg/day is currently recommended in all patients even in
the era of HAART.
Figure 7
Cryptococcus involvement of optic nerve and retina
Ocular tuberculosis
Though pulmonary tuberculosis is the commonest systemic
opportunistic infection seen in AIDS cases in India, the incidence
of ocular tuberculosis is very low. In our study of 1286 cases,
we found only 1% cases with presumed ocular tuberculosis.
It usually presents as multifocal choroidal tubercles with
discrete yellow lesions mainly at the posterior pole [Figure 8].
It may be associated with an exudative retinal detachment
with variable vitreous inflammation. Occasionally, however,
it may present as a big solitary posterior pole granuloma-like
mass lesion [Figure 9].23 Treatment with long-term
systemic anti-tuberculous drugs is effective in most cases. The spectrum
of ocular tuberculosis, however, is changing in today′s era of
HAART. Recently, there has been a report of worsening of ocular
tuberculosis in HIVpatients after antiretroviral therapy.24
Figure 8
Multiple choroidal tubercles due to ocular tuberculosis
Figure 9
Solitary mass lesion due to ocular tuberculosis
Unusual malignancies
Reported posterior segment manifestations of non-Hodgkin′s
lymphoma (NHL) include necrotizing retinitis, multifocal
choroiditis, retinal vasculitis, vitritis, subretinal mass, and
pseudo-hypopyon uveitis.25 Treatment options include
radiation and chemotherapy.
Neuro-ophthalmologic abnormalities
Neuro-ophthalmologic abnormalities usually are an indication
of infection or lymphoma of the brain or meninges and occur
in only 6% of AIDSpatients. Clinical abnormalities of the
optic nerve in a patient with AIDS may be recognized as
perineuritis, papilledema, papillitis, retrobulbar neuritis, and
optic atrophy.26
Syphilis
Ocular syphilis in AIDS may present as iritis, vitritis,
retrobulbar optic neuritis, perineuritis, papillitis, neuroretinitis,
retinal vasculitis, a necrotizing retinitis which may be
clinically indistinguishable from CMV and exudative retinal
detachment.27 Syphilis in AIDS may develop when CD4+
counts are greater than 200 cells/µl and, consequently, syphilis,
including ocular syphilis, may be the presenting illness leading
to the diagnosis of AIDS. It has been recommended that 12 to
24 million units of intravenous aqueous penicillin be
administered for 10 days in AIDSpatients with ocular
syphilis.
Ocular manifestations of HIV in the era of
HAART
The advent of potent antiretroviral therapy has had a profound
impact on the ophthalmological manifestations of AIDSpatients. As these drugs lead to improved immune function,
patients have fewer opportunistic infections. There have
been reports of dramatic decreases in the frequency of CMV
retinitis in areas where three- and four-drug antiretroviral
combination therapies are routinely being used. In addition to
decreased incidence, there are improved outcomes in patients
with CMV retinitis who received new active antiretroviral
therapy in addition to anti-CMV therapy.28 In many patients
with healed CMV retinitis who have responded to HAART,
anti-CMV therapy has been discontinued without reactivation
of the retinitis. In our study where combination antiretroviral
treatment was given to 12 patients with active CMV retinitis,
all anti-CMV cell
counts were >100/mm3 for three months.29 The median CD4
cell count increased from 36.5/mm3 (range, 3 to 74/mm3) at
baseline to 175.5/mm3 (range, 97 to 410/mm3) at three months.
No patient had reactivation of CMV retinitis or development
of extraocular CMV during median follow-up of 16.7 months.
Although at present there are no standardized criteria for
determining whether immunologic improvement is sufficient
to allow withdrawal of therapy, a CD4+ cell count of at least
100 cells/mcL for at least three to six months, or a rise of at
least 50 cells/mcL has been recommended.30,31
Reactivation of CMV retinitis has been reported in patients who discontinue
or become intolerant to HAART. When maintenance therapy
is discontinued, close observation is required.
Immune recovery uveitis
Immune recovery uveitis (IRU) is a noninfectious intraocular
inflammation which develops in patients with inactive CMV
retinitis who have had a substantial elevation in CD4+ count
with HAART. Immune recovery uveitis is the leading cause
of new visual loss in persons with AIDS seen in about 16 to
63% of HAART responders. The severity of the inflammation
depends on the degree of immune reconstitution, extent
of CMV retinitis, amount of intraocular CMV antigen,
and previous treatment. Clinical findings include anterior
chamber or vitreous reaction [Figure 10], panuveitis with
hypopon, optic disk and cystoid macular edema, epiretinal
membrane formation, cataract, vitreomacular traction
syndrome, and proliferative vitreoretinopathy.32,33
Treatment with corticosteroids (subtenon or systemic or intravitreal) is
effective in controlling inflammation and improving vision
in some cases. However, surgery may be required in patients
with vitreomacular traction syndrome, epiretinal membrane
formation, cataract, and proliferative vitreoretinopathy.
Figure 10
Severe vitritis due to immune recovery uveitis
Summary
CMV retinitis is much less common in the era of HAART but
remains one of the commonest ocular complications of AIDS
in India. Highly active anti-retroviral therapy has been shown
to cause regression of opportunistic infections, including CMV
retinitis, increase time to relapse of CMV retinitis, reduce the
incidence of CMV-related retinal detachments, and prolong
patient survival. Patients with inactive CMV retinitis who
have responded to HAART with a CD4+ cell count >100 cells/
mcL for more than three to six months may be candidates
for discontinuation of CMV maintenance therapy. Close
follow-up for any signs of reactivation is mandatory. Immune
recovery uveitis has been reported in patients with healed
CMV retinitis who have responded to HAART. Necrotizing
herpetic retinopathy and ocular tuberculosis are other common
posterior segment disorders seen in AIDS cases.
Authors: L D Ormerod; J A Larkin; C A Margo; P R Pavan; M M Menosky; D O Haight; J P Nadler; B G Yangco; S M Friedman; R Schwartz; J T Sinnott Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 1998-01 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: B D Kuppermann; J G Petty; D D Richman; W C Mathews; S C Fullerton; L S Rickman; W R Freeman Journal: Am J Ophthalmol Date: 1993-05-15 Impact factor: 5.258
Authors: Oubaida El Yamouni; Nazih Tzili; Abdallah El Hassan; Nadia Slassi; Mahfoud El Khaoua; Zakaria Jebbar; Amina Berraho Journal: Pan Afr Med J Date: 2014-09-24
Authors: Maria Fernanda Flores Herrera; Nicolas Dauby; Evelyne Maillart; Agnes Libois; Alberto Papaleo; Hind El Ouardighi; Laurence Postelmans; François Willermain; Dorine Makhoul Journal: Case Rep Ophthalmol Med Date: 2021-02-10