Literature DB >> 18710968

STARD statement: still room for improvement in the reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies.

Patrick M M Bossuyt.   

Abstract

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18710968     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2483080868

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


× No keyword cloud information.
  6 in total

1.  Prospective study of MMP7 serum levels in the diagnosis of cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Kawin Leelawat; Siriluck Narong; Jerasak Wannaprasert; Thawee Ratanashu-ek
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-10-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 2.  Psychiatric diagnosis by telephone: is it an opportunity?

Authors:  Esther M H Muskens; Peter Lucassen; Wilke Groenleer; Chris van Weel; Richard Oude Voshaar; Anne Speckens
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  2014-03-15       Impact factor: 4.328

Review 3.  Systematic Review and STARD Scoring of Renal Cell Carcinoma Circulating Diagnostic Biomarker Manuscripts.

Authors:  Marco A J Iafolla; Sarah Picardo; Kyaw Aung; Aaron R Hansen
Journal:  JNCI Cancer Spectr       Date:  2020-06-08

Review 4.  Guidelines for Reporting Medical Research: A Critical Appraisal.

Authors:  Mathilde Johansen; Simon Francis Thomsen
Journal:  Int Sch Res Notices       Date:  2016-03-22

5.  A qualitative study into the difficulties experienced by healthcare decision makers when reading a Cochrane diagnostic test accuracy review.

Authors:  Zhivko Zhelev; Ruth Garside; Christopher Hyde
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2013-05-16

6.  Measures of Diagnostic Accuracy: Basic Definitions.

Authors:  Ana-Maria Šimundić
Journal:  EJIFCC       Date:  2009-01-20
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.