Literature DB >> 1871036

Validation of bioanalytical methods.

H T Karnes1, G Shiu, V P Shah.   

Abstract

Validation of bioanalytical methods used to generate data for pharmacokinetic and bioavailability studies is approached by a variety of techniques and is subject to many different methods of interpretation. This Review puts the various techniques into perspective and discusses pitfalls which may occur in interpretation of validation data. Recovery studies, standardization techniques, and selectivity/specificity are discussed with regard to the intrinsic value of various techniques that are used in validation. Models used for analytical calibration curves are explained in terms of their validity and limitations, along with a presentation of the most common ways to validate the model. Analytical sensitivity and detection limits are presented and discussed with regard to the usefulness of the various definitions. Appropriate means of testing precision and accuracy, the most important factors in assessing method quality, are presented. Stability and ruggedness testing are discussed along with a presentation of ways to assess data acceptability on a daily run basis.

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1871036     DOI: 10.1023/a:1015882607690

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharm Res        ISSN: 0724-8741            Impact factor:   4.200


  4 in total

1.  Trend detection in control data: optimization and interpretation of Trigg's technique for trend analysis.

Authors:  G S Cembrowski; J O Westgard; A A Eggert; E C Toren
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  1975-09       Impact factor: 8.327

2.  The use of control charts in the clinical laboratory.

Authors:  S LEVEY; E R JENNINGS
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  1950-11       Impact factor: 2.493

Review 3.  Biological sample preparation and data reduction concepts in pharmaceutical analysis.

Authors:  E L Johnson; D L Reynolds; D S Wright; L A Pachla
Journal:  J Chromatogr Sci       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 1.618

4.  Statistical estimations in pharmacokinetics.

Authors:  H G Boxenbaum; S Riegelman; R M Elashoff
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm       Date:  1974-04
  4 in total
  23 in total

1.  Bioanalytical method validation--a revisit with a decade of progress.

Authors:  V P Shah; K K Midha; J W Findlay; H M Hill; J D Hulse; I J McGilveray; G McKay; K J Miller; R N Patnaik; M L Powell; A Tonelli; C T Viswanathan; A Yacobi
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 4.200

2.  Analytical laboratory quality: Part II. Analytical method validation.

Authors:  N M Ritter; T Hayes; J Dougherty
Journal:  J Biomol Tech       Date:  2001-03

3.  An approach to the validation of flow cytometry methods.

Authors:  Jo Cunliffe; Nicola Derbyshire; Sue Keeler; Ruth Coldwell
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2009-10-14       Impact factor: 4.200

4.  Evaluation of pharmacokinetic studies: is it useful to take into account concentrations below the limit of quantification?

Authors:  H Humbert; M D Cabiac; J Barradas; C Gerbeau
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 4.200

5.  Characterization of the permeability barrier of human skin in vivo.

Authors:  F Pirot; Y N Kalia; A L Stinchcomb; G Keating; A Bunge; R H Guy
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1997-02-18       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Retrospective data analysis and proposal of a practical acceptance criterion for inter-laboratory cross-validation of bioanalytical methods using liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Tomoki Yoneyama; Takashi Kudo; Fumihiro Jinno; Eric R Schmidt; Takahiro Kondo
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2014-08-15       Impact factor: 4.009

7.  An enzymatic colorimetric assay for glucose-6-phosphate.

Authors:  Aiping Zhu; Roberto Romero; Howard R Petty
Journal:  Anal Biochem       Date:  2011-08-27       Impact factor: 3.365

8.  Precision, accuracy, and data acceptance criteria in biopharmaceutical analysis.

Authors:  H T Karnes; C March
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 4.200

9.  Development of a sensitive radioimmunoassay for Fab fragments: application to Fab pharmacokinetics in humans.

Authors:  C V Thanh-Barthet; M Urtizberea; A E Sabouraud; N J Cano; J M Scherrmann
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 4.200

10.  An enzymatic fluorimetric assay for glucose-6-phosphate: application in an in vitro Warburg-like effect.

Authors:  Aiping Zhu; Roberto Romero; Howard R Petty
Journal:  Anal Biochem       Date:  2009-02-10       Impact factor: 3.365

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.