Literature DB >> 18709919

Reasons of the heart: emotion, rationality, and the "wisdom of repugnance".

Gregory E Kaebnick1.   

Abstract

Much work in bioethics tries to sidestep bedrock questions about moral values. This is fine if we agree on our values; arguments about human enhancement suggest we do not. One bedrock question underlying these arguments concerns the role of emotion in morality: worries about enhancement are derided as emotional and thus irrational. In fact, both emotion and reason are integral to all moral judgment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18709919     DOI: 10.1353/hcr.0.0037

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hastings Cent Rep        ISSN: 0093-0334            Impact factor:   2.683


  5 in total

1.  The issue of being touched.

Authors:  Betty-Ann Solvoll; Anders Lindseth
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2016-06

2.  Refining deliberation in bioethics.

Authors:  Miguel Kottow
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2009-07-19

Review 3.  Emerging ethical perspectives in the clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats genome-editing debate.

Authors:  Silvia Camporesi; Giulia Cavaliere
Journal:  Per Med       Date:  2016-10-28       Impact factor: 2.512

4.  Naturalness and Animal Welfare.

Authors:  James Yeates
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2018-04-05       Impact factor: 2.752

Review 5.  Limits to human enhancement: nature, disease, therapy or betterment?

Authors:  Bjørn Hofmann
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2017-10-10       Impact factor: 2.652

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.