UNLABELLED: The treadmill test combined with myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) is a commonly used technique in the assessment of coronary artery disease (CAD). However, there is a group of patients who may not be able to undergo the treadmill test. Pharmacologic stress testing is increasingly utilized for stress perfusion imaging and currently accounts for nearly 40% of all nuclear stress testing [8]. The aim of this study was the introduction of adenosine stress protocols in our nuclear laboratory, and the following, recording and comparing of the frequency and severity of side-effects. METHODS: We performed two kinds of adenosine stress protocols on 186 patients who underwent MPI with radiotracer 99mTc-sestamibi: 1st: 47 patients underwent AdenoSCAN abbreviated protocol IV. adenosin 140microg/kg/min for 3 minutes; 2nd: AdenoEX combined with low level 50W bicycle exercise in 139 patients. We followed and compared side-effects (minor and major events) between AdenoSCAN and AdenoEX protocol, and established an adequate time for imaging of both protocols. RESULTS: Compared with AdenoSCAN, AdenoEX protocol was tolerated by all patients; it reduced all side-effects and improved image quality. Using AdenoEX protocol we found that the heart-to-liver ratio was significantly better, and we established a time of imaging of 15 minutes after stress, compared to the AdenoSCAN time of imaging which was a minimum of 45 minutes after stress. CONCLUSION: This study gives advatages to AdenoEX protocol, because it had fewer side-effects, improved patients' tolerance, improved image quality, and enhanced efficiency and throughput given the opportunity for earlier imaging.
UNLABELLED: The treadmill test combined with myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) is a commonly used technique in the assessment of coronary artery disease (CAD). However, there is a group of patients who may not be able to undergo the treadmill test. Pharmacologic stress testing is increasingly utilized for stress perfusion imaging and currently accounts for nearly 40% of all nuclear stress testing [8]. The aim of this study was the introduction of adenosine stress protocols in our nuclear laboratory, and the following, recording and comparing of the frequency and severity of side-effects. METHODS: We performed two kinds of adenosine stress protocols on 186 patients who underwent MPI with radiotracer 99mTc-sestamibi: 1st: 47 patients underwent AdenoSCAN abbreviated protocol IV. adenosin 140microg/kg/min for 3 minutes; 2nd: AdenoEX combined with low level 50W bicycle exercise in 139 patients. We followed and compared side-effects (minor and major events) between AdenoSCAN and AdenoEX protocol, and established an adequate time for imaging of both protocols. RESULTS: Compared with AdenoSCAN, AdenoEX protocol was tolerated by all patients; it reduced all side-effects and improved image quality. Using AdenoEX protocol we found that the heart-to-liver ratio was significantly better, and we established a time of imaging of 15 minutes after stress, compared to the AdenoSCAN time of imaging which was a minimum of 45 minutes after stress. CONCLUSION: This study gives advatages to AdenoEX protocol, because it had fewer side-effects, improved patients' tolerance, improved image quality, and enhanced efficiency and throughput given the opportunity for earlier imaging.