Literature DB >> 18708436

Follow-up of pituitary tumor volume in patients with acromegaly treated with pegvisomant in clinical trials.

Camilo Jimenez1, Pia Burman, Roger Abs, David R Clemmons, William M Drake, Kent R Hutson, Michael Messig, Michael O Thorner, Peter J Trainer, Robert F Gagel.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We examined pituitary tumor volumes in patients treated with pegvisomant for 18 months or longer, and in whom the tumors were monitored for at least 3 years. We present details on 9 of 304 patients in clinical trials with pegvisomant who experienced tumor growth within the first year of treatment.
METHOD: Magnetic resonance images prior to start of pegvisomant and at last follow-up were examined in 43 patients (14% of participating patients). Twenty-nine had received prior radiation therapy (18% of irradiated patients) and all but five received somatostatin analogs between periods of pegvisomant treatment.
RESULTS: At follow-up, the median tumor volume was 0.6 cc (range 0.0-19.7 cc), in comparison with 1.6 cc (0.0-19.7 cc) at baseline (P<0.001). Twenty-five patients, of which 23 received radiation therapy, had tumor volume reduction. Seventeen patients had no significant change. One patient, who had not received radiation therapy, had an increase in tumor volume from 1.61 to 1.93 cc. Of the nine patients with tumor growth, six had progressive growth before initiating pegvisomant. Two patients with stable tumors while on octreotide experienced enlargement after octreotide discontinuation but remained stable on long-term pegvisomant therapy.
CONCLUSION: The present data indicate that pegvisomant does not promote tumor growth and suggest that the nine observed cases of tumor progression, which occurred within 8 months after commencing pegvisomant, are likely rebound expansions after discontinuation of somatostatin analogs and/or the natural history of aggressively growing pituitary tumors. Continued long-term surveillance of tumor volume, particularly in non-irradiated patients, is recommended.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18708436     DOI: 10.1530/EJE-08-0205

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Endocrinol        ISSN: 0804-4643            Impact factor:   6.664


  15 in total

1.  Dose optimization of somatostatin analogues for acromegaly patients.

Authors:  A Colao; G Lombardi
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 4.256

Review 2.  Update on prognostic factors in acromegaly: Is a risk score possible?

Authors:  E Fernandez-Rodriguez; F F Casanueva; I Bernabeu
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 4.107

3.  A medical software system for volumetric analysis of cerebral pathologies in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data.

Authors:  Jan Egger; Christoph Kappus; Bernd Freisleben; Christopher Nimsky
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2011-03-08       Impact factor: 4.460

Review 4.  Expert consensus document: A consensus on the medical treatment of acromegaly.

Authors:  Andrea Giustina; Philippe Chanson; David Kleinberg; Marcello D Bronstein; David R Clemmons; Anne Klibanski; Aart J van der Lely; Christian J Strasburger; Steven W Lamberts; Ken K Y Ho; Felipe F Casanueva; Shlomo Melmed
Journal:  Nat Rev Endocrinol       Date:  2014-02-25       Impact factor: 43.330

5.  Optimal use of pegvisomant in acromegaly: are we getting there?

Authors:  Andrea Giustina
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2014-10-28       Impact factor: 3.633

Review 6.  Medical therapy in acromegaly.

Authors:  Mark Sherlock; Conor Woods; Michael C Sheppard
Journal:  Nat Rev Endocrinol       Date:  2011-03-29       Impact factor: 43.330

7.  Pegvisomant and cabergoline combination therapy in acromegaly.

Authors:  I Bernabeu; C Alvarez-Escolá; A E Paniagua; T Lucas; I Pavón; J M Cabezas-Agrícola; F F Casanueva; M Marazuela
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 4.107

8.  Long-term treatment with pegvisomant as monotherapy in patients with acromegaly: experience from ACROSTUDY.

Authors:  Pamela U Freda; Murray B Gordon; Nicky Kelepouris; Peter Jonsson; Maria Koltowska-Haggstrom; A J van der Lely
Journal:  Endocr Pract       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 3.443

9.  GBM volumetry using the 3D Slicer medical image computing platform.

Authors:  Jan Egger; Tina Kapur; Andriy Fedorov; Steve Pieper; James V Miller; Harini Veeraraghavan; Bernd Freisleben; Alexandra J Golby; Christopher Nimsky; Ron Kikinis
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Pituitary adenoma volumetry with 3D Slicer.

Authors:  Jan Egger; Tina Kapur; Christopher Nimsky; Ron Kikinis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-12-11       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.