Literature DB >> 18707785

Impact of the boost dose of 10 Gy versus 26 Gy in patients with early stage breast cancer after a microscopically incomplete lumpectomy: 10-year results of the randomised EORTC boost trial.

Philip M Poortmans1, Laurence Collette, Jean-Claude Horiot, Walter F Van den Bogaert, Alain Fourquet, Abraham Kuten, Evert M Noordijk, Willem Hoogenraad, René-Olivier Mirimanoff, Marianne Pierart, Erik Van Limbergen, Harry Bartelink.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess the impact of the boost dose in patients with involved surgical margins. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In the EORTC "boost versus no boost" trial, 251 patients with a microscopically incomplete tumour excision were randomised to receive either a low boost dose of 10 Gy (126 patients) or a high boost dose of 26 Gy (125 patients). Overall survival and the cumulative incidence of local recurrence as first event were compared by Logrank and Gray test, respectively (2-sided alpha=0.05), with a median follow-up of 11.3 years. The planned sample size was 660 patients, but only 251 were recruited.
RESULTS: The median age at randomisation was 54 years. Thirty-seven patient initially relapsed locally. At 10 years, the cumulative incidence of local recurrence was 17.5% (95% CI: 10.4-24.6%) versus 10.8% (95% CI: 5.2-16.4%) for the low and high boost dose groups, respectively (HR=0.83, 95% CI: 0.43-1.57, Gray p>0.1). Overall, 64 patients have died (25.5%), 47 of them of breast cancer, without a difference in duration of survival between the two groups (HR=0.97, 95% CI=0.59-1.5, p>0.1). Severe fibrosis was palpated in the breast in 1% versus 5% and in the boost area in 3% versus 13% in the low and high boost dose groups, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: There was no statistically significant difference in local control or survival between the high boost dose of 26 Gy and the low boost dose of 10 Gy in patients with microscopically incomplete excision of early breast cancer. Fibrosis, however, was noted significantly more frequently in cases treated with the high boost dose.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18707785     DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2008.07.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiother Oncol        ISSN: 0167-8140            Impact factor:   6.280


  35 in total

1.  Fibrotic changes after postmastectomy radiotherapy and reconstructive surgery in breast cancer. A retrospective analysis in 109 patients.

Authors:  Johannes Classen; Sibille Nitzsche; Diethelm Wallwiener; Peter Kristen; Rainer Souchon; Michael Bamberg; Sara Brucker
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2010-11-08       Impact factor: 3.621

2.  Margins! Margins. Margins? How Important Is Margin Status in Breast-Preserving Therapy?

Authors:  Jürgen Dunst; Kathrin Dellas
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2011-10-31       Impact factor: 2.860

3.  Update 2010 of the German AGO Recommendations for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Early and Metastatic Breast Cancer - Chapter A: Surgery, Pathology and Prognostic Factors, Adjuvant and Neoadjuvant Therapy, Adjuvant Radiotherapy.

Authors:  Christoph Thomssena; Nadia Harbeckb
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2010-08-20       Impact factor: 2.860

4.  Comparison between intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and 3D tangential beams technique used in patients with early-stage breast cancer who received breast-conserving therapy.

Authors:  Beata Sas-Korczyńska; Anna Sladowska; Bożena Rozwadowska-Bogusz; Sonia Dyczek; Jan Lesiak; Anna Kokoszka; Stanisław Korzeniowski
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2010-08-04

5.  Evaluation of adaptive radiotherapy (ART) by use of replanning the tumor bed boost with repeated computed tomography (CT) simulation after whole breast irradiation (WBI) for breast cancer patients having clinically evident seroma.

Authors:  Omer Sager; Ferrat Dincoglan; Bora Uysal; Selcuk Demiral; Hakan Gamsiz; Yelda Elcim; Esin Gundem; Bahar Dirican; Murat Beyzadeoglu
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2018-04-05       Impact factor: 2.374

6.  Intraoperative radiotherapy of the breast - really a valide option or "only" comfortable.

Authors:  Marc D Piroth
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2013-05

Review 7.  Clinical and technological transition in breast cancer.

Authors:  Philip Poortmans; Hugo Marsiglia; Manuel De Las Heras; Manuel Algara
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2013-09-09

8.  Interdisciplinary GoR level III Guidelines for the Diagnosis, Therapy and Follow-up Care of Breast Cancer: Short version - AWMF Registry No.: 032-045OL AWMF-Register-Nummer: 032-045OL - Kurzversion 3.0, Juli 2012.

Authors:  R Kreienberg; U-S Albert; M Follmann; I B Kopp; T Kühn; A Wöckel
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 2.915

9.  Real-time intraoperative detection of breast cancer using near-infrared fluorescence imaging and Methylene Blue.

Authors:  Q R J G Tummers; F P R Verbeek; B E Schaafsma; M C Boonstra; J R van der Vorst; G-J Liefers; C J H van de Velde; J V Frangioni; A L Vahrmeijer
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  2014-02-22       Impact factor: 4.424

10.  Comparison of brachytherapy and external beam radiotherapy boost in breast-conserving therapy: Patient-reported outcome measures and aesthetic outcome.

Authors:  I Kindts; A Laenen; M Christiaens; H Janssen; E Van Limbergen; C Weltens
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2018-08-23       Impact factor: 3.621

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.