PURPOSE: To report an image segmentation algorithm that was developed to provide quantitative thickness measurement of six retinal layers in optical coherence tomography (OCT) images. DESIGN: Prospective cross-sectional study. METHODS: Imaging was performed with time- and spectral-domain OCT instruments in 15 and 10 normal healthy subjects, respectively. A dedicated software algorithm was developed for boundary detection based on a 2-dimensional edge detection scheme, enhancing edges along the retinal depth while suppressing speckle noise. Automated boundary detection and quantitative thickness measurements derived by the algorithm were compared with measurements obtained from boundaries manually marked by three observers. Thickness profiles for six retinal layers were generated in normal subjects. RESULTS: The algorithm identified seven boundaries and measured thickness of six retinal layers: nerve fiber layer, inner plexiform layer and ganglion cell layer, inner nuclear layer, outer plexiform layer, outer nuclear layer and photoreceptor inner segments (ONL+PIS), and photoreceptor outer segments (POS). The root mean squared error between the manual and automatic boundary detection ranged between 4 and 9 mum. The mean absolute values of differences between automated and manual thickness measurements were between 3 and 4 mum, and comparable to interobserver differences. Inner retinal thickness profiles demonstrated minimum thickness at the fovea, corresponding to normal anatomy. The OPL and ONL+PIS thickness profiles respectively displayed a minimum and maximum thickness at the fovea. The POS thickness profile was relatively constant along the scan through the fovea. CONCLUSIONS: The application of this image segmentation technique is promising for investigating thickness changes of retinal layers attributable to disease progression and therapeutic intervention.
PURPOSE: To report an image segmentation algorithm that was developed to provide quantitative thickness measurement of six retinal layers in optical coherence tomography (OCT) images. DESIGN: Prospective cross-sectional study. METHODS: Imaging was performed with time- and spectral-domain OCT instruments in 15 and 10 normal healthy subjects, respectively. A dedicated software algorithm was developed for boundary detection based on a 2-dimensional edge detection scheme, enhancing edges along the retinal depth while suppressing speckle noise. Automated boundary detection and quantitative thickness measurements derived by the algorithm were compared with measurements obtained from boundaries manually marked by three observers. Thickness profiles for six retinal layers were generated in normal subjects. RESULTS: The algorithm identified seven boundaries and measured thickness of six retinal layers: nerve fiber layer, inner plexiform layer and ganglion cell layer, inner nuclear layer, outer plexiform layer, outer nuclear layer and photoreceptor inner segments (ONL+PIS), and photoreceptor outer segments (POS). The root mean squared error between the manual and automatic boundary detection ranged between 4 and 9 mum. The mean absolute values of differences between automated and manual thickness measurements were between 3 and 4 mum, and comparable to interobserver differences. Inner retinal thickness profiles demonstrated minimum thickness at the fovea, corresponding to normal anatomy. The OPL and ONL+PIS thickness profiles respectively displayed a minimum and maximum thickness at the fovea. The POS thickness profile was relatively constant along the scan through the fovea. CONCLUSIONS: The application of this image segmentation technique is promising for investigating thickness changes of retinal layers attributable to disease progression and therapeutic intervention.
Authors: Annie Chan; Jay S Duker; Hiroshi Ishikawa; Tony H Ko; Joel S Schuman; James G Fujimoto Journal: Retina Date: 2006 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 4.256
Authors: Mircea Mujat; Raymond Chan; Barry Cense; B Park; Chulmin Joo; Taner Akkin; Teresa Chen; Johannes de Boer Journal: Opt Express Date: 2005-11-14 Impact factor: 3.894
Authors: Hiroshi Ishikawa; Daniel M Stein; Gadi Wollstein; Siobahn Beaton; James G Fujimoto; Joel S Schuman Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2005-06 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Abbas Shirinifard; James Alexander Glazier; Maciej Swat; J Scott Gens; Fereydoon Family; Yi Jiang; Hans E Grossniklaus Journal: PLoS Comput Biol Date: 2012-05-03 Impact factor: 4.475
Authors: Nazli Demirkaya; Hille W van Dijk; Sanne M van Schuppen; Michael D Abràmoff; Mona K Garvin; Milan Sonka; Reinier O Schlingemann; Frank D Verbraak Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2013-07-22 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Gyeong Woo Cheon; Berk Gonenc; Russell H Taylor; Peter L Gehlbach; Jin U Kang Journal: IEEE ASME Trans Mechatron Date: 2017-09-05 Impact factor: 5.303
Authors: Alexandre R Tumlinson; Boris Hermann; Bernd Hofer; Boris Povazay; Tom H Margrain; Alison M Binns; Wolfgang Drexler Journal: Jpn J Ophthalmol Date: 2009-09-08 Impact factor: 2.447
Authors: Bhavna J Antony; Michael D Abràmoff; Matthew M Harper; Woojin Jeong; Elliott H Sohn; Young H Kwon; Randy Kardon; Mona K Garvin Journal: Biomed Opt Express Date: 2013-11-01 Impact factor: 3.732
Authors: Sirichai Pasadhika; Gerald A Fishman; Edwin M Stone; Martin Lindeman; Ruth Zelkha; Irma Lopez; Robert K Koenekoop; Mahnaz Shahidi Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2009-12-03 Impact factor: 4.799